What Could “Fair Allocation” during the Covid-19 Crisis Possibly Mean in Sub-Saharan Africa?

CITATION: Moodley, K. et al. 2020. What Could "Fair Allocation" during the Covid-19 Crisis Possibly Mean in Sub-Saharan Africa?. The Hastings Center report, 50(3):33–35. doi:10.1002/hast.1129The original publication is available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1552146xThe Covid-19 pandemic has sparked rapid and voluminous production of bioethics commentary in popular media and academic publications. Many of the discussions are new twists on an old theme: how to fairly allocate scarce medical resources, such as ventilators and intensive care unit beds. In this essay, we do not add another allocation scheme to the growing pile, partly out of appreciation that such schemes should be products of inclusive and transparent community engagement and partly out of recognition of their limited utility for physicians working in the field. Instead, we make the more modest claim that context matters when making such decisions and, more specifically, that recommendations from high-income countries about fair allocation during Covid-19 should not be cut and pasted into low-income settings. We offer a few examples of why seemingly universal, well-intentioned ethical recommendations could have adverse consequences if unreflectively applied in sub-Saharan Africa.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1129Publishers versio

Allocation of scarce resources in Africa during COVID-19:Utility and justice for the bottom of the pyramid?

CITATION: Moodley, K. et al. 2020. Allocation of scarce resources in Africa during COVID‐19 : utility and justice for the bottom of the pyramid? Developing World Bioethics, doi:10.1111/dewb.12280.The original publication is available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.comThe COVID‐19 pandemic has raised important universal public health challenges. Conceiving ethical responses to these challenges is a public health imperative but must take context into account. This is particularly important in sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA). In this paper, we examine how some of the ethical recommendations offered so far in high‐income countries might appear from a SSA perspective. We also reflect on some of the key ethical challenges raised by the COVID‐19 pandemic in low‐income countries suffering from chronic shortages in health care resources, and chronic high morbidity and mortality from non‐COVID‐19 causes. A parallel is drawn between the distribution of severity of COVID‐19 disease and the classic “Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid” model that is relevant in SSA. Focusing allocation of resources during COVID‐19 on the ‘thick’ part of the pyramid in Low‐to‐Middle Income Countries (LMICs) could be ethically justified on utilitarian and social justice grounds, since it prioritizes a large number of persons who have been economically and socially marginalized. During the pandemic, importing allocation frameworks focused on the apex of the pyramid from the global north may therefore not always be appropriate. In a post‐COVID‐19 world, we need to think strategically about how health care systems can be financed and structured to ensure broad access to adequate health care for all who need it. The root problems underlying health inequity, exposed by COVID‐19, must be addressed, not just to prepare for the next pandemic, but to care for people in resource poor settings in non‐pandemic times.NIH. Grant Numbers: D43‐TW01511‐01, R25‐TW007098https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/dewb.12280Publisher's versio

A melt blowing-electrospinning approach to fabricating nanofibers

A polymer drawing model for melt blowing-electrospinning is established. The fiber diameters are predicted and measured. The results show that the predicted diameters show good agreements with the measured diameters. Fibers fabricated with electrospinning are finer than those without electrospinning, giving a new way to the mass production of nanofibers

Allocation of scarce resources in Africa during COVID‐19 : utility and justice for the bottom of the pyramid?

CITATION: Moodley, K. et al. 2020. Allocation of scarce resources in Africa during COVID‐19 : utility and justice for the bottom of the pyramid? Developing World Bioethics, doi:10.1111/dewb.12280.The original publication is available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.comThe COVID‐19 pandemic has raised important universal public health challenges. Conceiving ethical responses to these challenges is a public health imperative but must take context into account. This is particularly important in sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA). In this paper, we examine how some of the ethical recommendations offered so far in high‐income countries might appear from a SSA perspective. We also reflect on some of the key ethical challenges raised by the COVID‐19 pandemic in low‐income countries suffering from chronic shortages in health care resources, and chronic high morbidity and mortality from non‐COVID‐19 causes. A parallel is drawn between the distribution of severity of COVID‐19 disease and the classic “Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid” model that is relevant in SSA. Focusing allocation of resources during COVID‐19 on the ‘thick’ part of the pyramid in Low‐to‐Middle Income Countries (LMICs) could be ethically justified on utilitarian and social justice grounds, since it prioritizes a large number of persons who have been economically and socially marginalized. During the pandemic, importing allocation frameworks focused on the apex of the pyramid from the global north may therefore not always be appropriate. In a post‐COVID‐19 world, we need to think strategically about how health care systems can be financed and structured to ensure broad access to adequate health care for all who need it. The root problems underlying health inequity, exposed by COVID‐19, must be addressed, not just to prepare for the next pandemic, but to care for people in resource poor settings in non‐pandemic times.NIH. Grant Numbers: D43‐TW01511‐01, R25‐TW007098https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/dewb.12280Publisher's versio