Le financement à l’épisode de soins : un modèle efficient pour renforcer le lien ville-hôpital en France et au Québec ?

International audienc

Le financement à l’épisode de soins : un modèle efficient pour renforcer le lien ville-hôpital en France et au Québec ?

International audienc

Analyse comparative du cadre juridique et normatif encadrant la pratique de la pharmacie au Canada (Québec), en France, en Suisse (Genève) et en Belgique

peer reviewe

Evaluating the costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a systematic review

Abstract Background Adverse drug events (ADEs) are not only a safety and quality of care issue for patients, but also an economic issue with significant costs. Because they often occur during hospital stays, it is necessary to accurately quantify the costs of ADEs. This review aimed to investigate the methods to calculate these costs, and to characterize their nature. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted to identify methods used to assess the cost of ADEs on Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Original articles published from 2017 to 2022 in English and French were included. Economic evaluations were included if they concerned inpatients. Results From 127 studies screened, 20 studies were analyzed. There was a high heterogeneity in nature of costs, methods used, values obtained, and time horizon chosen. A small number of studies considered non-medical (10%), indirect (20%) and opportunity costs (5%). Ten different methods for assessing the cost of ADEs have been reported and nine studies did not explain how they obtained their values. Conclusions There is no consensus in the literature on how to assess the costs of ADEs, due to the heterogeneity of contexts and the choice of different economic perspectives. Our study adds a well-deserved overview of the existing literature that can be a solid lead for future studies and method implementation. Trial registration PROSPERO registration CRD42023413071

Chimiothérapies dans le cancer colorectal : étude pragmatique des modifications de prescription et de dose intensité

International audienceINTRODUCTION:Chemotherapy induced toxicities can generate changes in prescribing and relative dose intensity which have an impact on therapeutic efficacy.METHOD:This is a prospective observational study performed in hepato-gastroenterology department for 6 months. All patients treated for colorectal cancer and beginning a protocol with at least one parenteral drug have been included.RESULTS:Among the 48 patients enrolled, 85.4% of them had at least one prescription change, which concerned 30.3% of 238 cycles. Of the 766 analyzed prescription lines, 16.6% of them were postponed and/or 6.7% had modified dosage and/or 5.6% were stopped prematurely. Grades 2 to 4 adverse reactions were responsible for at least one change prescribing to 64.6% of patients and 17.6% of cycles. Toxicity induced prescription changes were mainly due to clinical toxicities (79.3%). The rate of patients with a relative dose intensity greater than 70% was 92.9% in adjuvant state, 66.7% and 62.5% in metastatic state first line and second and subsequent line.CONCLUSION:High-grade clinical toxicities are the main chemotherapy prescription change pattern in colorectal cancer. Knowledge of toxicities before the patient's arrival is expected to target patients for which the drug preparation can be anticipated and for which a cycle postponement, dose adjustment or discontinuation is necessary

Assessment of anti-infective medication adherence in pediatric outpatients

International audienc

Impact of a preoperative pharmaceutical consultation in scheduled orthopedic surgery on admission: a prospective observational study

International audienceBackground. Medication errors have a high prevalence in surgery and management of home medication is strongly involved in these errors. In scheduled surgery, the preoperative consultation is a privileged time to inform the patient about the management of her/his home medication before admission. This study assessed the impact of a pre-anesthesia best possible medication history (PA-BPMH) on admission. The PA-BPMH was performed by a clinical pharmacist prior to the anesthesia consultation for anesthesiologists to prescribe admission medical orders for scheduled orthopedic surgery patients. Methods.This was a prospective observational study which was carried out in an orthopedic surgery department. All patients over 18 years old with an elective orthopedic surgery were eligible except ambulatory surgery patients. The pharmacist registered the PA-BPMH into the software making it available for anesthesiologists for the pre-admission medication order. Finally, a medication reconciliation was performed at admission. The main outcome was the percentage of patients with at least one unintended medication discrepancy (UMD) at admission. The nature, potential clinical impact and acceptance rate of each UMD detected were assessed. Also, the PA-BPMH process was described and patients and anesthesiologists satisfaction was evaluated. Results. A total of 455 patients had a pharmaceutical consultation. Medication reconciliation was performed at admission for 360 patients. Overall, at least one UMD was observed in 13.0% of patients ( n = 47). A total of 63 UMD were detected. The most common type of UMD was omission (25.4%) and incorrect drug (23.8%).Two UMD (3.2%) were evaluated as life threatening. All the UMD detected were corrected on the admission medication order. Conclusion. A preoperative pharmacist-anesthesiologist teamwork seems to improve the safety of perioperative management of home medication for scheduled orthopedic surgery patients. This process needs a randomized clinical trial across a wider range of surgeries before its implementation

Improving Patientʼs Primary Medication Adherence: The Value of Pharmaceutical Counseling

International audienceQuality of transitions of care is one of the first concerns in patient safety. Redesigning the discharge process to incorporate clinical pharmacy activities could reduce the incidence of postdischarge adverse events by improving medication adherence. The present study investigated the value of pharmacist counseling sessions on primary medication adherence after hospital discharge.This study was conducted in a 1844-bed hospital in France. It was divided in an observational period and an interventional period of 3 months each. In both periods, ward-based clinical pharmacists performed medication reconciliation and inpatient follow-up. In interventional period, initial counseling and discharge counseling sessions were added to pharmaceutical care. The primary medication adherence was assessed by calling community pharmacists 7 days after patient discharge.We compared the measure of adherence between the patients from the observational period (n = 201) and the interventional period (n = 193). The rate of patients who were adherent increased from 51.0% to 66.7% between both periods (P < 0.01). When discharge counseling was performed (n = 78), this rate rose to 79.7% (P < 0.001). The multivariate regression performed on data from both periods showed that age of at least 78 years old, and 3 or less new medications on discharge order were predictive factors of adherence. New medications ordered at discharge represented 42.0% (n = 1018/2426) of all medications on discharge order. The rate of unfilled new medications decreased from 50.2% in the observational period to 32.5% in the interventional period (P < 10). However, patients included in the observational period were not significantly more often readmitted or visited the emergency department than the patients who experienced discharge counseling during the interventional period (45.3% vs. 46.2%; P = 0.89).This study highlights that discharge counseling sessions are essential to improve outpatients' primary medication adherence. We identified predictive factors of primary nonadherence in order to target the most eligible patients for discharge counseling sessions. Moreover, implementation of discharge counseling could be facilitated by using Health Information Technology to adapt human resources and select patients at risk of nonadherence

Interactions between antiretroviral therapy and complementary and alternative medicine: a narrative review

International audienceBackground : The use of complementary and alternative medicine including herbal medicine (phytotherapy), vitamins, minerals and food supplements is frequent among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHAs) who take antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, but is often not known by their prescribing physicians. Some drug–supplement combinations may result in clinically meaningful interactions.Aims : In this literature review, we aimed to investigate the evidence for complementary and alternative medicine interactions with ARVs.Sources : A bibliographic search of all in vitro, human studies and case reports of the PubMed database was performed to assess the risk of interactions between complementary and alternative self-medication products and ARVs. The ‘HIV drug interaction’ (https://www.hiv-druginteractions.org) and ‘Natural medicines comprehensive database’ (https://naturalmedicines.therapeuticresearch.com) interaction checkers were also analysed.Content : St John's wort, some forms of garlic, grapefruit and red rice yeast are known to have significant interaction and thus should not be co-administered, or should be used with caution with certain ARV classes. Data on other plant-based supplements come from in vitro studies or very small size in vivo studies and are thus insufficient to conclude the real in vivo impact in case of concomitant administration with ARVs. Some polyvalent minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and iron salts can reduce the absorption of integrase inhibitors by chelation. Potential interactions with vitamin C and quercetin with some ARVs should be noted and efficacy and tolerance of the treatment should be monitored.Implications : This review shows the importance of screening all PLWHAs for complementary and alternative medicine use to prevent treatment failure or adverse effects related to an interaction with ARVs. Further human studies are warranted to describe the clinical significance of in vitro interactions between numerous complementary and alternative medicine and ARVs