13 research outputs found

    For determination of the liver injury FFPE-section were stained for DNA-strand breaks using a TUNEL-assay.

    No full text
    <p>Tunel<sup>+</sup>-cells were counted. Counterstaining was perfomed using Haematoxylin (A). Pictures were taken in 200 fold magnification. Results displaying an increase of TUNEL<sup>+</sup>-cells in regard to mFPR1 and mFPR2-deficiency are shown as a Graph (B). (* = p<0.05; ** = p<0.01.)</p

    To identify the infiltrating immune cells after LPS stimulation according to their surface markers, CD11b was used to detect infiltrating monocytes and macrophages in the liver (A).

    No full text
    <p>Pictures were taken in 200-fold magnification and the CD11b<sup>+</sup>-cells were counted. The results were displayed as a graph (B) indicating differences among WT, mFPR1<sup>-/-</sup> and mFPR2<sup>-/-</sup> (* = p<0.05; ** = p<0.01; # = p<0.0001).</p

    The clinical and histological analysis after LPS-stimulation includes measuring of ALT (A) and AST (B).

    No full text
    <p>The histological analysis was performed using H&E staining (C). Overview pictures at 0 h were taken in 100-fold magnification, detail microphotographs at 3 h and 6 h post LPS such as infiltrating immune cells are magnified 200-fold (* = p<0.05; *** = p<0.005).</p

    To investigate liver proliferation FFPE-sections were stained with the universal cell cycle marker Ki67.

    No full text
    <p>At 3<sup>+</sup>-nuclei were counted and analyzed as percentage of proliferative cells. Photomicrographs were taken at 200-fold and representative images are shown. Ki67<sup>+</sup>-nuclei are indicated by arrows (* = p<0.05; ** = p<0.01).</p

    The Expression of the three mFPRs mFPR1 (A), mFPR2 (B) and mFPR3 (C) was analysed by qPCR and the gene expression was related to GAPDH.

    No full text
    <p>For the analysis of inflammation in the BDL-model immune cells were stained for CD11b-positivity. Graphical score for the amount of CD11b<sup>+</sup>-cells in the liver displays an increase over time. The cells are displayed as numbers per view field (D).</p

    The second subset of immune cells were analysed by Ly6G-staining.

    No full text
    <p>Mainly neutrophil granulocytes were identified as Ly6G<sup>+</sup> (A). Pictures were taken in 200-fold magnification and the Ly6G<sup>+</sup>-cells were counted. The results were displayed as a graph (B) indicating differences among WT, mFPR1<sup>-/-</sup> and mFPR2<sup>-/-</sup> (* = p<0.05; ** = p<0.01; # = p<0.0001).</p

    Additional file 5: of CRAMP deficiency leads to a pro-inflammatory phenotype and impaired phagocytosis after exposure to bacterial meningitis pathogens

    No full text
    Co-stimulation of exogenous CRAMP and bacterial supernatant NM induced increase of HO-1 immunofluorescence in CRAMP-KO microglial cells. Microglial cells from CRAMP-WT or KO mice were incubated with 1, 2 or 10 μM mouse CRAMP with or without supernatant of NM for 6 h. After incubation cells were fixed and immunolabeled using anti-HO-1 antibody (green) and nuclear counterstaining DAPI (blue) and examined with fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows representative results from three independent experiments. Scale bar = 20 μm. (TIFF 3834 kb

    Additional file 4: of CRAMP deficiency leads to a pro-inflammatory phenotype and impaired phagocytosis after exposure to bacterial meningitis pathogens

    No full text
    Exogenous application of CRAMP reduced NFκB translocation in CRAMP-KO microglial cells. Microglial cells from CRAMP-WT (A) or KO (B) mice were incubated with 1, 2 or 10 μM mouse CRAMP with or without supernatant of NM for 30 min, 1 or 2 h. After incubation cells were fixed and immunolabeled using anti-NFκB p65 antibody (red) and nuclear counterstaining DAPI (blue) and examined with fluorescence microscopy. The figure shows representative results from three independent experiments. Scale bar = 20 μm. (TIFF 19383 kb
    corecore