O USO DE ETANOL E ISOPROPANOL NA EXTRAÇÃO DE DNA DE PLANTAS

A extração de DNA é uma etapa importante para se analisar o genoma de espécies vegetais. Diversos protocolos já foram propostos com a finalidade de otimizar essa fase, pois o protocolo, muitas vezes, tem que ser ajustado para determinada amostra de planta. Entretanto, pouco se tem estudado sobre o tipo de álcool mais adequado para precipitação do DNA. Sendo assim, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o tempo de precipitação e a qualidade das amostras de DNA de abacate (Persea americana), ameixa japonesa (Prunus salicina), banana (Musa paradisiaca), goiaba (Psidium guajava), mamão (Carica papaya) e manga (Mangifera indica), quando tratadas com etanol e isopropanol, simultaneamente ou separadamente. Percebeu-se que T3, em que se utilizou 50% de etanol e 50% de isopropanol em um mix, foi o melhor tratamento, pois agregou a integridade do DNA, fornecida pelo etanol, e a redução do tempo de precipitação proporcionado pelo isopropanol

Auditory discrimination and frequency modulation learning in schizophrenia patients: amphetamine within-subject dose response and time course.

BACKGROUND: Auditory frequency modulation learning (auditory learning) is a key component of targeted cognitive training (TCT) for schizophrenia. TCT can be effective in enhancing neurocognition and function in schizophrenia, but such gains require significant time and effort and elude many patients. METHODS: As a strategy to increase and/or accelerate TCT-induced clinical gains, we tested the dose- and time-course effects of the pro-attentional drug, amphetamine (AMPH; placebo, 2.5, 5 or 10 mg po; within-subject double-blind, order balanced) on auditory learning in schizophrenia patients [n = 32; M:F = 19:13; age 42.0 years (24-55)]. To understand predictors and/or mechanisms of AMPH-enhanced TCT, we also measured auditory fidelity (words-in-noise (WIN), quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN)) and neurocognition (MATRICS comprehensive cognitive battery (MCCB)). Some measures were also acquired from age-matched healthy subjects (drug free; n = 10; M:F = 5:5). RESULTS: Patients exhibited expected deficits in neurocognition. WIN and QuickSIN performance at low signal intensities was impaired in patients with low v. high MCCB attention/vigilance (A/V) scores; these deficits were corrected by AMPH, maximally at 2.5-5 mg (ds = 0.79-1.29). AMPH also enhanced auditory learning, with maximal effects at 5 mg (d = 0.93), and comparable effects 60 and 210 min post pill. Pro-learning effects of AMPH and AMPH-induced gains in auditory fidelity were most evident in patients with low MCCB A/V scores. CONCLUSIONS: These findings advance our understanding of the impact of pro-attentional interventions on auditory information processing and suggest dose- and time-course parameters for studies that assess the ability of AMPH to enhance the clinical benefits of TCT in schizophrenia patients

Amphetamine alters an EEG marker of reward processing in humans and mice.

The bench-to-bedside development of pro-cognitive therapeutics for psychiatric disorders has been mired by translational failures. This is, in part, due to the absence of pharmacologically sensitive cognitive biomarkers common to humans and rodents. Here, we describe a cross-species translational marker of reward processing that is sensitive to the aminergic agonist, d-amphetamine. Motivated by human electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, we recently reported that frontal midline delta-band power is an electrophysiological biomarker of reward surprise in humans and in mice. In the current series of experiments, we determined the impact of parametric doses of d-amphetamine on this reward-related EEG response from humans (n = 23) and mice (n = 28) performing a probabilistic learning task. In humans, d-amphetamine (placebo, 10 mg, 20 mg) boosted the Reward Positivity event-related potential (ERP) component as well as the spectral delta-band representations of this signal. In mice, d-amphetamine (placebo, 0.1 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg) boosted both reward and punishment ERP features, yet there was no modulation of spectral activities. In sum, the present results confirm the role of dopamine in the generation of the Reward Positivity in humans, and pave the way toward a pharmacologically valid biomarker of reward sensitivity across species

Memantine effects on auditory discrimination and training in schizophrenia patients

The uncompetitive low-affinity NMDA receptor antagonist, memantine, acutely increases electrophysiological measures of auditory information processing in both healthy subjects (HS) and patients with schizophrenia. Memantine effects on functional measures of auditory discrimination performance and learning are not known; conceivably, beneficial effects on these measures might suggest a role for memantine in augmenting the cognitive and functional impact of auditory targeted cognitive training (TCT). Here, carefully characterized HS (n = 20) and schizophrenia patients (n = 22) were tested in measures of auditory discrimination performance (words-in-noise (WIN), quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN), gaps-in-noise) and auditory frequency modulation learning (a component of TCT) on 2 days about a week apart, after ingesting either placebo or 20 mg memantine po, in a double-blind, within-subject cross-over random order design. Memantine modestly enhanced functional measures of auditory discrimination in both schizophrenia patients (WIN) and HS (WIN and QuickSIN), as well as auditory frequency modulation learning in schizophrenia patients. These findings converge with a growing literature showing that memantine can enhance a range of metrics of auditory function. These properties could contribute to the apparent benefits of memantine as an adjunctive treatment in schizophrenia, and suggest that memantine might augment learning and potentially clinical gains from auditory-based TCT

EEG reveals that dextroamphetamine improves cognitive control through multiple processes in healthy participants

The poor translatability between preclinical and clinical drug trials has limited pro-cognitive therapeutic development. Future pro-cognitive drug trials should use translatable cross-species cognitive tasks with biomarkers (1) relevant to specific cognitive constructs, and (2) sensitive to drug treatment. Here, we used a difficulty-modulated variant of a cross-species cognitive control task with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) to identify neurophysiological biomarkers sensitive to the pro-cognitive effects of dextroamphetamine (d-amp) (10 or 20 mg) in healthy adults (n = 23), in a randomized, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced, double blind, within-subject study, conducted across three test days each separated by one week. D-amp boosted d-prime, sped reaction time, and increased frontal P3a amplitude to non-target correct rejections independent of task difficulty. Task difficulty did however, moderate d-amp effects on EEG during target performance. D-amp suppressed frontal theta power during easy target responses which negatively correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate while d-amp-induced changes in P3b amplitude during hard target trials strongly correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate. In summary, d-amp affected both behavioral and neurophysiological measures of cognitive control elements. Under low-demand, d-amp diminished cognitive control by suppressing theta, yet under high-demand it boosted control in concert with higher P3b amplitudes. These findings thus appear to reflect a gain-sharpening effect of d-amp: during high-demand processes were boosted while during low-demand processes were neglected. Future studies will use these neurophysiological measures of cognitive control as biomarkers to predict d-amp sensitivity in people with cognitive control deficits, including schizophrenia

Using Biomarkers to Predict Memantine Effects in Alzheimer's Disease: A Proposal and Proof-Of-Concept Demonstration.

Memantine's benefits in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are modest and heterogeneous. We tested the feasibility of using sensitivity to acute memantine challenge to predict an individual's clinical response. Eight participants completed a double-blind challenge study of memantine (placebo versus 20 mg) effects on autonomic, subjective, cognitive, and neurophysiological measures, followed by a 24-week unblinded active-dose therapeutic trial (10 mg bid). Study participation was well tolerated. Subgroups based on memantine sensitivity on specific laboratory measures differed in their clinical response to memantine, some by large effect sizes. It appears feasible to use biomarkers to predict clinical sensitivity to memantine

Lessons learned by giving amphetamine to antipsychotic-medicated schizophrenia patients

Experimental Medicine studies in psychiatric populations test specific, mechanistic hypotheses related to the biology of mental illness, by combining well-characterized neurobiological probes and laboratory-based measures of behavioral performance and neurobiology. However, scientific inquiry through the acute administration of psychoactive drugs to patients with serious mental illness raises important ethical issues. These issues arise in studies in which the psychostimulant, amphetamine, is used as an Experimental Medicine probe in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we summarize relevant aspects of our experience with acute, laboratory-based challenges of amphetamine in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia patients participated in one or more Experimental Medicine studies involving limited doses of amphetamine with clinical monitoring, over a 4-year period. Acute (within hours of ingestion; collective n = 53), subacute (three active doses over 4 weeks; n = 28), and long-term (mean = 17 months after ingestion; n = 19) effects of amphetamine ingestion were assessed. In antipsychotic (AP)-medicated schizophrenia patients, amphetamine was associated with no detrimental subjective, autonomic, or functional changes. Symptoms assessed acutely, subacutely, or long term were either unchanged or diminished. No adverse acute, subacute, or long-term consequences from the Experimental Medicine use of amphetamine in antipsychotic-medicated schizophrenia patients were detected. These findings do not address the safety or effectiveness of the use of amphetamine in unmedicated patients, or as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia. Indeed, it is important to distinguish evidence-based risks of symptom exacerbation in an Experimental Medicine setting vs. risks associated with long-term, daily clinical use or even misuse of amphetamine