Randomised trial of excimer laser angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Excimer laser coronary angioplasty is reported to give excellent procedural results for treatment of complex coronary lesions, but this method has not been compared with balloon angioplasty in a randomised trial. METHODS: Patients (n = 308) with stable angina and coronary lesions longer than 10 mm on visual assessment were included. 151 patients (158 lesions) were assigned randomly to laser angioplasty and 157 (167 lesions) to balloon angioplasty. The primary clinical endpoints were death, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, or repeat coronary angioplasty of the randomised segment during 6 months of follow-up. The primary angiographic endpoint was the minimal lumen diameter at follow-up in relation to the baseline value (net gain), as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. FINDINGS: Laser angioplasty was followed by balloon angioplasty in 98% of procedures. The angiographic success rate was 80% in patients treated with laser angioplasty compared with 79% in patients treated with balloon angioplasty. There were no deaths. Myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, and repeat angioplasty occurred in 4.6%, 10.6%, and 21.2%, respectively, of the patients in the laser angioplasty group compared with 5.7%, 10.8%, and 18.5% of the balloon angioplasty group. Net mean (SD) gain in minimal lumen diameter was 0.40 (0.69) mm in patients treated with laser angioplasty and 0.48 (0.66) mm in those treated with balloon angioplasty (p = 0.34). The restenosis rate (> 50% diameter stenosis) was 51.6% in the laser angioplasty group versus 41.3% in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.13). INTERPRETATION: Excimer laser angioplasty followed by balloon angioplasty provides no benefit additional to balloon angioplasty alone with respect to the initial and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery diseas

Editor's choice : European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 clinical practice guidelines on the management of acute limb ischaemia

A

Type 2 Endoleak With or Without Intervention and Survival After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Objective: The aims of the present study were to examine the impact of type 2 endoleaks (T2EL) on overall survival and to determine the need for secondary intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A multicentre retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands was conducted among patients with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who underwent EVAR between 2007 and 2012. The primary endpoint was overall survival for patients with (T2EL+) or without (T2EL-) a T2EL. Secondary endpoints were sac growth, AAA rupture, and secondary intervention. Kaplan–Meier survival and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used. Results: A total of 2 018 patients were included. The median follow up was 62.1 (range 0.1 – 146.2) months. No difference in overall survival was found between T2EL+ (n = 388) and T2EL- patients (n = 1630) (p =.54). The overall survival estimates at five and 10 years were 73.3%/69.4% and 45.9%/44.1% for T2EL+/T2EL- patients, respectively. Eighty-five of 388 (21.9%) T2EL+ patients underwent a secondary intervention. There was no difference in overall survival between T2EL+ patients who underwent a secondary intervention and those who were treated conservatively (p =.081). Sac growth was observed in 89 T2EL+ patients and 44/89 patients (49.4%) underwent a secondary intervention. In 41/44 cases (93.1%), sac growth was still observed after the intervention, but was left untreated. Aneurysm rupture occurred in 4/388 T2EL patients. In Cox regression analysis, higher age, ASA classification, and maximum iliac diameter were significantly associated with worse overall survival. Conclusion: No difference in overall survival was found between T2EL+ and T2EL- patients. Also, patients who underwent a secondary intervention did not have better survival compared with those who did not undergo a secondary intervention. This study reinforces the need for conservative treatment of an isolated T2EL and the importance of a prospective study to determine possible advantages of the intervention

Corrigendum to 'Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections' [European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery 59/3 (2020) 339-384]

peer reviewe

Always Contact a Vascular Interventional Specialist Before Amputating a Patient with Critical Limb Ischemia

Patients with severe critical limb ischemia (CLI) due to long tibial artery occlusions are often poor candidates for surgical revascularization and frequently end up with a lower limb amputation. Subintimal angioplasty (SA) offers a minimally invasive alternative for limb salvage in this severely compromised patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of SA in patients with CLI caused by long tibial occlusions who have no surgical options for revascularization and are facing amputation. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients with CLI due to long tibial occlusions who were scheduled for amputation because they had no surgical options for revascularization and who were treated by SA. A total of 26 procedures in 25 patients (14 males; mean age, 70 ± 15 [SD] years) were evaluated. Technical success rate was 88% (23/26). There were four complications, which were treated conservatively. Finally, in 10 of 26 limbs, no amputation was needed. A major amputation was needed in 10 limbs (7 below-knee amputations and 3 above-knee amputations). Half of the major amputations took place within 3 months after the procedure. Cumulative freedom of major amputation after 12 months was 59% (SE = 11%). In six limbs, amputation was limited to a minor amputation. Seven patients (28%) died during follow-up. In conclusion, SA of the tibial arteries seem to be a valuable treatment option to prevent major amputation in patients with CLI who are facing amputation due to lack of surgical options

Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections.

peer reviewe