31 research outputs found
The Issue of Knowledge of Students about Additional Professional Education Programs
Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π°ΠΊΠ°Π»Π°Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠ° Π² Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π±ΡΠ΅ 2020 Π³. (n = 199). ΠΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ· Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ° Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ°Ρ
Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ (ΠΠΠ). ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΎ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌ, Π½ΠΎ 21 % Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌ. 26 % ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π·Π°ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ ΠΠΠ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°ΡΠ½Π°Ρ (Π½Π΅Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ) ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°ΡΡ Π»ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠ°Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΉΠ΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½ Π² ΠΌΠ°Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ΅.The article examines the main results of a sociological study of fourth-year full-time undergraduate students in December 2020 (n = 199). One of the objectives of the survey was to identify the awareness of students about programs of additional professional education (APE). Most of the students are aware of the existence of programs, but 21 % are not informed about the existence of the programs. 26 % of the surveyed students stated the need for additional training programs. Adequate (low) cost leads by a wide margin as the main motivating factor in choosing an APE program. In addition, significant factors of motivation are the benefits for admission to the master programs and the transfer of completed courses as disciplines in the master programs
ΠΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ
The subject of the article is assessment of public confidence in the police and the legality of its activities by the opinion of the Russian population. The purpose of the research is to identify the reasons that affect the assessment of the police legitimacy, its perception by the population. The authors also dare to identify the role of "problem areas" of police activity (related to different violations of the law) in people assessment.The methodology of the research includes: sociological survey among Russians, comparative criminological, statistical, hermeneutic methods, expert assessments.The main result, scope of applications. The central link of the police legitimacy is public trust, recognition, leading to the cooperation between the people and the authorities. Legitimacy assessments are formed based on the study of public opinion β the official monitoring procedure. The website of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs provides information on the results of monitoring public opinion about the activities of the police, but an analysis of its content allows us to note its superficiality and unconvincing optimism. This is obviously affected by the shortcomings of the departmental legal regulation of the process of monitoring public opinion about the activities of the police, which, judging by the questionnaire questions (there are only three of them), is rather imitative in nature. We believe that the official monitoring of public opinion on the activities of the police, at a minimum, should be supplemented by the results of independent sociological studies aimed at establishing "problem areas" of police activity related to violations of the law, violence, ill-treatment, provocations, inducing someone, directly or indirectly, to commit illegal actions, other official abuses. Otherwise, the regulatory requirements for the activities of the police, which establish the foundations of its legitimacy, cannot be fully implemented. The survey of 362 citizens conducted by the authors allows to state that, with a fairly high assessment of the activities of the Russian police, respondents pay attention to the existence of such problems as: the lack of transparency of police activities and the presence of formal and informal means of evading the legality of police activity, the tolerance of justice authorities to police lawlessness, intoxication with power by police officers, the impact of police brutality on social and legal despair, violation of the law in the name of achieving its falsely understood goals. The extreme case of perverted official zeal is the execution of illegal orders. There are quite widespread ideas in public opinion that entrepreneurs often become victims of extortion by the police, that the police take bribes from medium and small businesses, that you can buy off police officers. At the same time, the results of the study indicate that a significant part of the population is determined to cooperate with the police.Conclusions. The public demand for the police is relevant, the honor and main meaning of which is to protect the interests of all people and serve justice. People need such policemen who will demonstrate not strength and power, but simple human complicity. This is the main secret of the legitimacy of the police. Another secret lies in the orientation of personnel policy towards professionals in the police: their selection, training and support in difficult situations.ΠΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ Π΅Π΅ Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π³ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π·Π²Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠΈΠ΅, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, Π²Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Ρ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ β ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π°. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Π²Π»ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Β«ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π·ΠΎΠ½ΡΒ» Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡ, ΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΌ, ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΏΡΡΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ-Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ ΠΊ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π½ΡΡ
Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΌ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π·Π»ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ. ΠΠ΅Π»Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ, Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ΅Π½ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΡ
Β«ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ
Π·ΠΎΠ½Β»
The paternalism as the ideology of the interaction of a physician and a patient in the system of the rural health care
Π ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π° Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΠΎΠΌ, Π° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅Π³ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ.The paper discusses the features of the interaction of a physician and patient in the system of the rural public health. Based on the results of the research of patients and the medical staff in the article indicates that the interaction is founded on the paternalistic ideology that is reproduced by the medical personnel but patients tend to the Collegial model of the interaction
ΠΠ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠΠΠ― ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ― ΠΠ ΠΠΠ Π Π£Π¦ΠΠΠΠΠ«Π ΠΠ ΠΠ‘Π’Π£ΠΠΠΠΠΠ―
The subject. The central element in combating corruption is punitive practice. The whole history of mankind testifies that corruption can be restrained only by effective application of criminal punishment.The purpose of the article is to show the practice of assigning criminal punishment for cor-ruption crimes of various kinds.The description of methodology. The authors use the conception criminally-legal response. The following characteristics of the criminal-legal response are distinguished: lack of response; very weak response β the number of convicts does not exceed 10; weak response β the num-ber of convicts is calculated within a few dozen people; adequate response β the number of convicts and penalties correspond to the criminological characteristics of a group of crimes; intensive reaction β the norm is realized in conditions of the possibility of ensuring the inevi-tability of punishment; punitive response β the norm is applied on the basis of the "letter, not the spirit" of the law; reflexive response β the appointment of punishment to privileged crim-inals in conditions of increased public attention; protest reaction β judicial practice comes into conflict with ill-conceived legislative novels.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of imposing punishment for corruption crimes in the following spheres is ana-lyzed: electoral; public service; commercial-service relations; of justice.Conclusions. Punitive practice in relation to persons convicted of corruption crimes in gen-eral is characterized by exceptional humanism. As the main penalties the penalty is leading (50.1%), in the second place β suspended imprisonment (24.1%). Real deprivation of liberty applies only to the seventh part of corrupt officials (14.7%). For comparison: accordingΒ to art. 158 "Theft" in 2016 was sentenced to imprisonment twice as many criminals β 30,3%. This ratio indicates an underestimation of the public danger of corruption crime and actu-ally disavows the proclaimed thesis that corruption is a systemic threat to national security.Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π² Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Ρ Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ. ΠΠ»Ρ Π΅Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°-Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π°Π³ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π½Π°-Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ³ΠΎ-Π»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π°Π³ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌ
Trivalent mRNA vaccine-candidate against seasonal flu with cross-specific humoral immune response
Seasonal influenza remains a serious global health problem, leading to high mortality rates among the elderly and individuals with comorbidities. Vaccination is generally accepted as the most effective strategy for influenza prevention. While current influenza vaccines are effective, they still have limitations, including narrow specificity for certain serological variants, which may result in a mismatch between vaccine antigens and circulating strains. Additionally, the rapid variability of the virus poses challenges in providing extended protection beyond a single season. Therefore, mRNA technology is particularly promising for influenza prevention, as it enables the rapid development of multivalent vaccines and allows for quick updates of their antigenic composition. mRNA vaccines have already proven successful in preventing COVID-19 by eliciting rapid cellular and humoral immune responses. In this study, we present the development of a trivalent mRNA vaccine candidate, evaluate its immunogenicity using the hemagglutination inhibition assay, ELISA, and assess its efficacy in animals. We demonstrate the higher immunogenicity of the mRNA vaccine candidate compared to the inactivated split influenza vaccine and its enhanced ability to generate a cross-specific humoral immune response. These findings highlight the potential mRNA technology in overcoming current limitations of influenza vaccines and hold promise for ensuring greater efficacy in preventing seasonal influenza outbreaks
Infrared Studies on Bimetallic Copper/Nickel Catalysts Supported on Zirconia and Ceria/Zirconia
ABSTRACT: Infrared spectroscopy has been employed for a detailed characterization of ZrO(2) and CeO(2)/ZrO(2) supported nickel and copper/nickel catalysts to be utilized for methane decomposition. Adsorption of CO at 303Β K was performed in order to determine the surface composition and accessible adsorption sites. Alloy formation occurred during reduction, as indicated by a red-shift of the vibrational band of CO on Ni: by 27Β cm(β1) on nickel-rich CuNi alloy, by 34Β cm(β1) on 1:1 Cu:Ni and by 36Β cm(β1) on copper-rich CuNi alloy. CuNi alloy formation was confirmed by X-ray absorption spectroscopy during reduction revealing a considerably lower reduction temperature of NiO in the bimetallic catalyst compared to the monometallic one. However, hydrogen chemisorption indicated that after reduction at 673Β K copper was enriched at the surface of the all bimetallic catalysts, in agreement with IR spectra of adsorbed CO. In situ IR studies of methane decomposition at 773Β K demonstrated that the addition of Cu to Ni strongly reduced coking occurring preferentially on nickel, while maintaining methane activation. Modification of the zirconia by ceria did not have much effect on the adsorption and reaction properties. Ceria-zirconia and zirconia supported samples exhibited very similar properties and surface chemistry. The main difference was an additional IR band of CO adsorbed on metallic copper pointing to an interaction of part of the Cu with the ceria. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Figure: see text
PRACTICE OF PUNISHMENT FOR CORRUPTION CRIMES
The subject. The central element in combating corruption is punitive practice. The whole history of mankind testifies that corruption can be restrained only by effective application of criminal punishment.The purpose of the article is to show the practice of assigning criminal punishment for cor-ruption crimes of various kinds.The description of methodology. The authors use the conception criminally-legal response. The following characteristics of the criminal-legal response are distinguished: lack of response; very weak response β the number of convicts does not exceed 10; weak response β the num-ber of convicts is calculated within a few dozen people; adequate response β the number of convicts and penalties correspond to the criminological characteristics of a group of crimes; intensive reaction β the norm is realized in conditions of the possibility of ensuring the inevi-tability of punishment; punitive response β the norm is applied on the basis of the "letter, not the spirit" of the law; reflexive response β the appointment of punishment to privileged crim-inals in conditions of increased public attention; protest reaction β judicial practice comes into conflict with ill-conceived legislative novels.The main results and scope of their application. The practice of imposing punishment for corruption crimes in the following spheres is ana-lyzed: electoral; public service; commercial-service relations; of justice.Conclusions. Punitive practice in relation to persons convicted of corruption crimes in gen-eral is characterized by exceptional humanism. As the main penalties the penalty is leading (50.1%), in the second place β suspended imprisonment (24.1%). Real deprivation of liberty applies only to the seventh part of corrupt officials (14.7%). For comparison: accordingΒ to art. 158 "Theft" in 2016 was sentenced to imprisonment twice as many criminals β 30,3%. This ratio indicates an underestimation of the public danger of corruption crime and actu-ally disavows the proclaimed thesis that corruption is a systemic threat to national security
Risks in Rural Health Care: Doctor's Opinion
Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π° Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ
. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ
Π·ΠΎΠ½ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.The article is about risks and problems from opinions of medical staff in Russian rural health care. The paper is shown analysis of the main risks and problem areas of rural health care functioning
The Interaction of Health Workers and Patients in the System of Rural Healthcare
Problems of the Russian rural healthcare are considered in the masterβs dissertation in light of the conducted reforms and transformations for the relationship health workers and patients. The dissertation presents the modern approach of the system of rural healthcare, which identified the several subsystems: interaction of the social communalities, medical service, medical institutions, management of the healthcare, norms and sanctions. Dissertationβs author described the results of the survey conducted in the villages of Dalmatovo district of Kurgan region. The study is based on the methodology of American philosopher R. Veatch, who classified the relations of health workers and patients on the four models: engineering, paternalistic, collegial and contract. The research identified the problems and contradictions in the system of rural healthcare.
The dissertation can be used as a textbook for a universityβs students training on the course and specialty βSociologyβ. Itβs interest for graduate students, universityβs teachers, academics of the field of social sciences and humanities.Π ΠΌΠ°Π³ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ° ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π² ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ: Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π½ΠΎΡΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π» ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΡ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»Π°Ρ
ΠΠ°Π»ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΡΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ° Π . ΠΠΈΡΡΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ: ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ, ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ, ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅Π³ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ, ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ½Π°Ρ. Π Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡ, Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.
ΠΠ°Π³ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Β«Π‘ΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΒ». ΠΠ½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ Π°ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ
Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊ
Strategy of Development of the Economic University: Opinion of USUEβ Workers
In the article, based on the analysis of the empirical study, the problems of the strategy of development of an economic university in Yekaterinburg of Sverdlovsk region are considered. The main components of the strategy of development of the university are considered, which were accepted by the university leadership into armament. An analysis is given of the opinion of professors and employees of the economic university on these and other components of the strategy of development of university.Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π² Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π±ΡΡΠ³Π΅ Π‘Π²Π΅ΡΠ΄Π»ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ·Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π½Π° Π²ΠΎΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ