data for dryad

data for drya

Genetic variation in female choosiness (copulation latency) as a function of male CHC profile (PCs 1–4, <i>(a)</i>–<i>(d)</i>).

<p>Male isolines (<i>N</i> = 8 isolines) are ranked on the x-axis according to mean PC score (left (low) to right (high) along axis). Each coloured line represents a female genotype (<i>N</i> = 20 isolines) pooled across temperatures.</p

Female G×E reaction norms for <i>(a)</i> female choosiness (copulation latency); and <i>(b)</i> female preference (mate acceptance) across post-eclosion temperatures.

<p>Each coloured line represents the mean score for each female isoline (<i>N</i> = 20 isolines). Points represent the overall mean score within each temperature across all isolines.</p

data on amino acid composition of spermatophylax

Excel file, variation in amino acid composition of the spermatophylax as a function of inbred line (A-I) and as determined by GC/M

Evolution_11-0425.R2_Dryad_Upload

This is a Microsoft Excel (c) spreadsheet containing the raw data for Evolution ID 11-0425.R2. Column headings are self explanatory. Data contained in columns K to AI represents area for CHC peaks 1-25 as quantified from chromatograms and data in columns AM to BJ is the area expressed in proportional values after dividing by the pentadecane standard (peak 1)

Summary of the sets of models tested for (I) female choosiness (copulation latency) and (II) female preference (mate acceptance) data.

<p>All models include post-eclosion temperature (t) as a fixed effect. Female isoline (F), male isoline (M) and any interactions are added as random effects, as shown. The best model is highlighted in bold and chosen using the DIC (supported by the approximate posterior probability) and models are ranked from best model fit (lowest DIC) to poorest model fit (highest DIC). Results are shown for models with and without block as a covariate. Results are qualitatively identical with and without a block effect, but model fit is improved slightly by removing block.</p

Posterior estimates of beta, <i>β</i>, the linear selection gradient, on each PC of male CHC expression for each female isoline×temperature combination using <i>(a)</i> female choosiness (copulation latency) and <i>(b)</i> female preference (mate acceptance) data.

<p>Each point represents a female isoline and the dashed line denotes <i>β</i> = 0 (i.e. no linear selection). Linear selection was significant overall on PC3 and PC4 for both choosiness and preference, and also on PC2 for choosiness (see text for details).</p

Overall estimates for <i>β</i>, the linear selection gradient, on each PC of CHC expression.

<p>95% credible intervals around each estimate are in brackets. Interval estimates which are significantly different from 0 are highlighted in bold. Choosiness is inferred from copulation latency data and preference from mate acceptance data. Note that consistent sexual selection will have the opposite sign for choosiness and preference.</p

Variance in female choosiness (copulation latency) and female preference (mate acceptance) accounted for by male isoline, female isoline and female isoline×temperature (G×E).

<p>95% credible intervals around each estimate are in brackets. Components included in the best model for each response are highlighted in bold.</p

Cross-environment genetic correlation and between- and within-environment heritability of female choosiness (copulation latency) and female preference (mate acceptance).

<p>95% credible intervals around each estimate are in brackets. Interval estimates which are distinct from 1 are highlighted in bold.</p