Models of alliteration derivation in the Quran

The importance of the research is drawn from the fact that it treats a rhetorical concept. Alliteration is an important science for understanding the meaning of the Quranic verses, and Alliteration Derivation presents an aspect of the rhetorical miracles of the Quran as well as reveals the stylistic beauty of the Arabic language. The research aims at highlighting the beauty of the Verses containing Derivation Alliteration and what results from them such an increase in the semantic sense of the Quran. The researchers have applied in this article the inductive approach by inducing the versus that have this type of Alliteration as well as we followed the analytical method by analyzing and interpreting the verses so giving significant expressions, creativity and innovation to the Holy Quran. We have reached by the end of the research to several important results: Alliteration is one of the most important sciences to understand the rhetorical verses of the Quran and extract ideas from it. Alliteration Derivation is also not advisable unless stated in an appropriate location, and it will be bothered if it were artificial. Moreover Alliteration Derivation gives the expressions of the Quran feature innovation, creation and innovation in finding different connotations. Additionally, it is not considered only as verbal ornaments and colorful decorations that have an eloquent impact attracting the listener, making him listen to and making it easy to hear, but also it affects the psychological aspect of the human being. As a matter of fact, the alliterated form can deceive the listener, whereas it shows you that it will repeat the meaning, and echo the pronunciation. However, it really fakes the listener by giving a new sense which is completely different from the proceeding one. At that moment, one feels extremely happy and pleased

نماذج من جناس الاشتقاق في القرآن الكريم

The importance of the research is drawn from the fact that it treats a rhetorical concept. Alliteration is an important science for understanding the meaning of the Quranic verses, and Alliteration Derivation presents an aspect of the rhetorical miracles of the Quran as well as reveals the stylistic beauty of the Arabic language. The research aims at highlighting the beauty of the Verses containing Derivation Alliteration and what results from them such an increase in the semantic sense of the Quran. The researchers have applied in this article the inductive approach by inducing the versus that have this type of Alliteration as well as we followed the analytical method by analyzing and interpreting the verses so giving significant expressions, creativity and innovation to the Holy Quran. We have reached by the end of the research to several important results: Alliteration is one of the most important sciences to understand the rhetorical verses of the Quran and extract ideas from it. Alliteration Derivation is also not advisable unless stated in an appropriate location, and it will be bothered if it were artificial. Moreover Alliteration Derivation gives the expressions of the Quran feature innovation, creation and innovation in finding different connotations. Additionally, it is not considered only as verbal ornaments and colorful decorations that have an eloquent impact attracting the listener, making him listen to and making it easy to hear, but also it affects the psychological aspect of the human being. As a matter of fact, the alliterated form can deceive the listener, whereas it shows you that it will repeat the meaning, and echo the pronunciation. However, it really fakes the listener by giving a new sense which is completely different from the proceeding one. At that moment, one feels extremely happy and pleased

Incidence of severe critical events in paediatric anaesthesia (APRICOT): a prospective multicentre observational study in 261 hospitals in Europe

Background Little is known about the incidence of severe critical events in children undergoing general anaesthesia in Europe. We aimed to identify the incidence, nature, and outcome of severe critical events in children undergoing anaesthesia, and the associated potential risk factors. Methods The APRICOT study was a prospective observational multicentre cohort study of children from birth to 15 years of age undergoing elective or urgent anaesthesia for diagnostic or surgical procedures. Children were eligible for inclusion during a 2-week period determined prospectively by each centre. There were 261 participating centres across 33 European countries. The primary endpoint was the occurence of perioperative severe critical events requiring immediate intervention. A severe critical event was defined as the occurrence of respiratory, cardiac, allergic, or neurological complications requiring immediate intervention and that led (or could have led) to major disability or death. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01878760. Findings Between April 1, 2014, and Jan 31, 2015, 31â127 anaesthetic procedures in 30â874 children with a mean age of 6·35 years (SD 4·50) were included. The incidence of perioperative severe critical events was 5·2% (95% CI 5·0â5·5) with an incidence of respiratory critical events of 3·1% (2·9â3·3). Cardiovascular instability occurred in 1·9% (1·7â2·1), with an immediate poor outcome in 5·4% (3·7â7·5) of these cases. The all-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 10 in 10â000. This was independent of type of anaesthesia. Age (relative risk 0·88, 95% CI 0·86â0·90; p<0·0001), medical history, and physical condition (1·60, 1·40â1·82; p<0·0001) were the major risk factors for a serious critical event. Multivariate analysis revealed evidence for the beneficial effect of years of experience of the most senior anaesthesia team member (0·99, 0·981â0·997; p<0·0048 for respiratory critical events, and 0·98, 0·97â0·99; p=0·0039 for cardiovascular critical events), rather than the type of health institution or providers. Interpretation This study highlights a relatively high rate of severe critical events during the anaesthesia management of children for surgical or diagnostic procedures in Europe, and a large variability in the practice of paediatric anaesthesia. These findings are substantial enough to warrant attention from national, regional, and specialist societies to target education of anaesthesiologists and their teams and implement strategies for quality improvement in paediatric anaesthesia. Funding European Society of Anaesthesiology

Incidence of severe critical events in paediatric anaesthesia (APRICOT): a prospective multicentre observational study in 261 hospitals in Europe

Background Little is known about the incidence of severe critical events in children undergoing general anaesthesia in Europe. We aimed to identify the incidence, nature, and outcome of severe critical events in children undergoing anaesthesia, and the associated potential risk factors. Methods The APRICOT study was a prospective observational multicentre cohort study of children from birth to 15 years of age undergoing elective or urgent anaesthesia for diagnostic or surgical procedures. Children were eligible for inclusion during a 2-week period determined prospectively by each centre. There were 261 participating centres across 33 European countries. The primary endpoint was the occurence of perioperative severe critical events requiring immediate intervention. A severe critical event was defined as the occurrence of respiratory, cardiac, allergic, or neurological complications requiring immediate intervention and that led (or could have led) to major disability or death. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01878760. Findings Between April 1, 2014, and Jan 31, 2015, 31 127 anaesthetic procedures in 30 874 children with a mean age of 6.35 years (SD 4.50) were included. The incidence of perioperative severe critical events was 5.2% (95% CI 5.0-5.5) with an incidence of respiratory critical events of 3.1% (2.9-3.3). Cardiovascular instability occurred in 1.9% (1.7-2.1), with an immediate poor outcome in 5.4% (3.7-7.5) of these cases. The all-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 10 in 10 000. This was independent of type of anaesthesia. Age (relative risk 0.88, 95% CI 0.86-0.90; p<0.0001), medical history, and physical condition (1.60, 1.40-1.82; p<0.0001) were the major risk factors for a serious critical event. Multivariate analysis revealed evidence for the beneficial effect of years of experience of the most senior anaesthesia team member (0.99, 0.981-0.997; p<0.0048 for respiratory critical events, and 0.98, 0.97-0.99; p=0.0039 for cardiovascular critical events), rather than the type of health institution or providers. Interpretation This study highlights a relatively high rate of severe critical events during the anaesthesia management of children for surgical or diagnostic procedures in Europe, and a large variability in the practice of paediatric anaesthesia. These findings are substantial enough to warrant attention from national, regional, and specialist societies to target education of anaesthesiologists and their teams and implement strategies for quality improvement in paediatric anaesthesia