21 research outputs found

    Survival Benefit in Renal Transplantation Despite High Comorbidity

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The age and degree of comorbidity among transplant candidates is increasing. Knowledge of survival benefit in relation to recipient age and comorbidity is important, considering the scarcity of organs available for transplantation. The aim of the present study was to analyze the chances and survival benefit of transplantation among patients in different age groups and with different degrees of comorbidity score at the time of entering the waiting list. METHODS: Data from the Danish Nephrology Registry and Scandiatransplant were merged. Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were derived from the National Danish Admissions Registry. Study period is from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2011. A multistate model was used to analyze the chance of having a renal transplantation and the effect of transplantation in different patients groups. RESULTS: Patients older than 65 years and patients with high comorbidity score had a decreased chance of being transplanted. However, if patients older than 65 years were transplanted with deceased donor, the mortality risk was reduced by 55% (hazard rate, 0.45 (0.26-0.75). In patients with a comorbidity score of 5 or greater, receiving a deceased donor transplant reduced the mortality risk by 72% (hazard rate, 0.28 (0.20-0.39). The overall survival benefit was 62% versus 70% in deceased versus living donor transplanted patients. CONCLUSIONS: Poor health and old age reduced the chance of being transplanted. However, patients older than 65 years and patients with high comorbidity still had a survival benefit from renal transplantation

    Quantification of cancer risk in glomerulonephritis

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background The association of increased cancer risk with glomerulonephritis (GN) is well known, but controversy exists concerning which types of GN are involved, and the size of the association. A national registry survey was performed to assess the size of this association, and the temporal relationship of cancer diagnosis to GN diagnosis. Methods All patients with biopsy-proven GN between 1985 and 2015 in Denmark were extracted from The Danish Renal Biopsy Registry and the National Pathology Data Bank. Incident cancer diagnoses between 10 years previous and 10 years subsequent to the GN diagnosis were extracted from the Danish Cancer Registry. Residence, birth and death data were obtained from the National Patient Register. Expected cancer incidence, classified according to cohort, age and sex were extracted from the Nordcan database. Results Nine hundred eleven cancers were diagnosed in 5594 patients. Thirty five percent were prevalent at renal biopsy. Prevalence at biopsy was 5.5% (expected 3.1%), but incidence was not increased  64 years from 11.8 (endocapillary GN) to 20.3% (unclassified). The diagnosis with the highest risk was membranoproliferative GN (8.6 & 19.6%). Conclusions Cancer rates are increased for many cancer and most GN diagnoses. Cancer screening for patients < 45 years and for patients without nephrosis or uraemia may not be necessary. The findings suggest that screening programs for specific GN diagnoses can be extended to other GN forms

    The use of absolute values improves performance of estimation formulae:a retrospective cross sectional study

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by equations such as Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) or Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) is usually expressed as a Body Surface Area (BSA) indexed value (ml/min per 1.73 m(2)). This can have severe clinical consequences in patients with extreme body sizes, resulting in an underestimation in the case of obesity or an overestimation of GFR in the case of underweight patients. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of both estimation formula expressed in ml/min, instead of ml/min per 1.73 m(2), with a reference method. METHODS: Retrospective single centre cross sectional study of 185 patients. GFR was measured with (51)Cr-EDTA and estimated with CKD-EPI and MDRD. Bias, precision and accuracy of absolute estimated GFR was calculated. RESULTS: Bias of CKD-EPI and MDRD formulae expressed as an absolute value was 0.49 and 0.27 ml/min respectively, which is lower than previously reported. Precision was 12.95 and 16.33 and accuracy expressed as P30 was over 92.43% for CKD-EPI. There were no significant differences in GFR between the reference method and the estimation formulae. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of CKD-EPI and MDRD formulae can be significantly improved in the individual patient if the absolute values are used by removing the BSA normalization factor. Absolute estimated GFR by CKD-EPI is comparable to measured GFR, improving the performance of this formula in the assessment of individual kidney function, thus providing clinicians with an alternative to reference methods

    Hypertensive nephropathy is associated with an increased risk of myeloma, skin, and renal cancer

    No full text
    Previous studies suggest an increased cancer risk in hypertension. Patients with hypertensive nephropathy have not been studied. A national registry study was performed to assess the presence and size of this association. Clinical data and cancer diagnoses for all patients with biopsy‐proven hypertensive nephropathy between 1985 and 2015 in Denmark were extracted from four national registries and compared with age‐ and sex‐adjusted national cancer rates. The risk of cancer was twice the background population. It was raised for renal cancer (odds ratio 10.4), myeloma (13.2), skin cancer (7.9), and other/unspecified (1.8). No increase in incidence was seen until 1 year before renal biopsy and then rose rapidly. It was again normal 5 years after biopsy. Hypertensive nephropathy is associated with an increased risk of myeloma, skin, renal, and other cancers. Screening of patients with hypertensive nephropathy, in the presence of reduced renal function or significant proteinuria, may be indicated

    Risk of death after first-time blood stream infection in incident dialysis patients with specific consideration on vascular access and comorbidity

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background The mortality following blood stream infection (BSI) and risk of subsequent BSI in relation to dialysis modality, vascular access, and other potential risk factors has received relatively little attention. Consequently, we assessed these matters in a retrospective cohort study, by use of the Danish nation-wide registries. Methods Patients more than 17 years of age, who initiated dialysis between 1.1.2010 and 1.1.2014, were grouped according to their dialysis modality and vascular access. Survival was modeled in time-dependent Cox proportional hazard analyses. Potential risk factors confined by a modified Charlson comorbidity index (MCCI), were subsequently assessed in stepwise selection models. Results At baseline, 764 patients received peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 434, 479, and 782 hemodialysis (HD) patients were dialyzed by use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), tunneled catheters (TCs), and non-tunneled catheters (NTCs), respectively. We identified 1069 BSIs with an overall incidence rate of 17.7 episodes per 100 person years, and 216 BSIs occurred more than one time in the same patient. HRs of post BSI mortality relative to PD were 3.20 (95% CI 1.86–5.50; p < 0.001) with NTCs; whereas no associations were found for AVF and TC. The risk of subsequent BSIs was higher with NTCs [HR 2.29 (95% CI 1.09–4.82), p = 0.030], and no significant difference was found for AVF and TC, in relation to PD. There was an increased risk of both outcomes with TC relative to AVF [death: 1.57 (95% CI 1.07–2.29, P < 0.021); BSI: 1.78 (95% CI 1.13–2.83, P < 0.014], and risk of death was reduced in patients who changed to AVF after first-time BSI. The MCCI was significantly associated with the risk of subsequent BSI and post BSI death; however, only some of the variables contained in the index were found to be significant risk predictors when analyzed in the fitted model. Conclusions While NTC was the most predominant risk factor for subsequent BSI and post BSI mortality, AVF appeared protective

    Mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis:a 30-year prognosis study

    No full text
    Background: Diffuse mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (MesP) is the most commonly diagnosed type of glomerulonephritis (GN) in Denmark, with an incidence of 10.8 million per year. In the present study, the 30-year renal survival was estimated. Methods: A retrospective cohort investigation of 140 patients with biopsy-proven MesP was performed between the period 1967-2006. Factors influencing renal survival were investigated using Cox regression analysis. Results: Renal survival at 5, 10, 20 and 30 years was 87, 78, 59 and 50%, respectively. Female survival after 30 years was significantly better than male survival (70 vs. 40%, p = 0.049). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and nephrotic syndrome (NS) was performed for each sex individually. An increase in GFR was associated with a hazard risk (HR) of 0.98 (p = 0.02) in women and 0.99 (p = 0.006) in men. Older age was associated with a HR of 1.04 (p = 0.02) in women and 1.03 (p = 0.004) in men. NS had a poorer prognosis in men (HR 2.53, p = 0.01), but not in women (HR 0.54, p = 0.38). Conclusion: Increasing age and decreasing GFR were adversely associated with renal death. Renal prognosis was better for women after 30 years, and NS resulted in a poorer prognosis in men. This suggests that disease course and prognosis are different between men and women
    corecore