Impulse zum Wandel von Interessen und AkteurInnennetzwerken in der österreichischen Waldpolitik: das Beispiel des Österreichischen Walddialoges

'Waldpolitik ist in Österreich durch eine lange bestehende, enge Verflechtung der zentralen staatlichen AkteurInnen und WaldeigentümerInnenverbände charakterisiert. Dieser Beitrag untersucht am Beispiel der österreichischen Waldpolitik, wie ein vergleichsweise geschlossenes Politikfeldnetzwerk auf externe Öffnungsimpulse reagiert: auf Vorgaben der internationalen Politik, Anreize durch EU-Rechtsakte und auf Konflikte im nationalen Politikfeld. Ihre Wirkung manifestiert sich im 'Österreichischen Walddialog', einem breit angelegten, partizipativen Dialogprozess, der uns als Fallstudie dient. Im Ergebnis stellen wir eine partielle Öffnung des Politikfeldnetzwerkes fest, sowohl in inhaltlicher Hinsicht als auch mit Blick auf die Beteiligung von AkteurInnen. Als Barrieren gegen eine weitere Öffnung zeigten sich zum einen institutionelle Faktoren, wie die föderale Kompetenzverteilung, und zum anderen die Handlungslogiken der AkteurInnen. Reaktive Handlungslogiken zwecks Domänensicherung und ein teils geringes Engagement von AkteurInnen haben die thematische Offenheit des Prozesses und die Reichweite des sektorübergreifenden Ansatzes beschränkt. Der politische Willen seitens des federführenden Ressorts, im Walddialog zu breit akkordierten Ergebnissen zu gelangen, sowie die vermittelnde Rolle einer Gruppe von ProponentInnen der Öffnung haben dennoch einen breiten, partizipativen Prozess ermöglicht und es erlaubt, konkrete und implementationsorientierte Ergebnisse zu erzielen.' (Autorenreferat)'The Austrian forest policy domain is characterised by a well-established, tightly related network of public actors, on the one hand, and forest owner interest groups on the other hand. In their contribution the authors examine how this policy domain's actors react upon external impulses to open the network to new actors and issues; i.e. how they react to demands resulting from international forest policy forums as well as to incentives resulting from EU regulations. Effects of these impulses became manifest in the 'Austrian Forest Dialogue'. This participative dialogue process serves as our case study. According to our findings, the Forest Dialogue lead to a partial opening of the forest policy domain network, both in terms of issues which have been dealt with as well as regards the number of actors that have become involved. Barriers for a broader opening of the domain are seen in institutional factors, e.g. in the distribution of jurisdictional responsibilities within the federal system, but primarily in the different rationalities which the actors followed in the course the process. Reactive strategies oriented towards defending interest domains as well as a low degree of engagement of some actors have set constraints to the ambitious cross-sectoral approach. However, the political will of the Ministry in charge of the process, which aimed to achieve broadly accepted outputs, and the mediatorial role of some central proponents finally facilitated and enabled a broad and participative dialogue process which resulted in quite concrete outputs.' (author's abstract)

Science-Policy Interactions in a Corporatist System: Knowledge Brokerage in Austrian Climate Policy

Climate change policy is a prime example for the growing importance of expert ad-vice to inform decision‐making. Consequently, a plethora of advisory bodies and pro-cesses have emerged around the world. However, there are marked differences in the way the interactions between science and politics are organized and practiced depending on a country’s political system and culture. The degree of political compe-tition, the role of state vis-à-vis non-state actors and the dominant modes of interest mediation provide specific conditions for the ways expertise is consulted and used in decision-making. Against this background, the paper presents the landscape of scientific advice in Austrian climate policy and asks in how far the traditionally strong culture of corporat-ism in Austrian politics manifests itself in practices of climate policy advice. Concep-tually, the paper draws on analytical dimensions derived from the concepts of “na-tional styles of policy-making” and “civic epistemology”. Methodically it bases on an interview series and a workshop with representatives from science, politics, and in-termediary organizations. Our analysis provides a differentiated picture: the neo-corporatist culture still leaves its imprint in Austrian climate policy advice. But at the same time, the emergence of a new policy field, such as climate policy, undoubtedly opens up possibilities for new actors and forms of policy advice

Getting a grip on negotiation processes: Addressing trade-offs in mountain biking in Austria, Germany and Switzerland

Space for recreation is an important service provided by forests close to urban and rural areas alike. Mountain biking, as one recreational activity, is increasingly becoming widespread, which can lead to challenging trade-off situations, as some benefits from forests come at the cost of another forest benefit and vice versa. For instance, illegally constructed mountain bike trails lead to trade-offs between environmental protection and other forest utilizations such as wood production. We thus study how such trade-off situations can be negotiated to find an outcome, such as a legal mountain bike trail, which is accepted by stakeholders. In doing so, we select case studies where we expect to find similar trade-off situations that lead to the negotiation process about mountain bike trails. Specifically, we analyse the cases' negotiation processes (action situations) by applying Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Our findings show the importance of collective actors, a clear delineation of responsibilities and of compensation and funding measures as well as structured workshops and collective site inspections for addressing trade-offs and for arriving at acceptable outcomes in our cases

Challenging pathways to safe water access in rural Uganda: From supply to demand-driven water governance

Uganda has experienced a major policy shift from a supply-driven to a demand-driven approach in rural water provision since 1990. The article sheds light on the rural population’s access to safe water within the changing institutional frameworks. We analysed individual and group interviews with key informants from national to community levels and relevant official documents with the ‘Social-Ecological Systems’ framework. Since the implementation of the demand-driven approach, rural safe water coverage has slightly improved but operation and maintenance of water sources pose a great challenge hampering, long-term access to safe water. The abrupt and top-down imposed policy shift has resulted in competing signals from old and new policies creating uncertainty and ambiguity about responsibilities, rules and incentives. The analysis shows the importance of taking into account the implications of national institutional disturbances on local collective action for long-term access to safe water

Challenging pathways to safe water access in rural Uganda: From supply to demand-driven water governance

Uganda has experienced a major policy shift from a supply-driven to a demand-driven approach in rural water provision since 1990. The article sheds light on the rural population’s access to safe water within the changing institutional frameworks. We analysed individual and group interviews with key informants from national to community levels and relevant official documents with the ‘Social-Ecological Systems’ framework. Since the implementation of the demand-driven approach, rural safe water coverage has slightly improved but operation and maintenance of water sources pose a great challenge hampering, long-term access to safe water. The abrupt and top-down imposed policy shift has resulted in competing signals from old and new policies creating uncertainty and ambiguity about responsibilities, rules and incentives. The analysis shows the importance of taking into account the implications of national institutional disturbances on local collective action for long-term access to safe water

Piecemeal Integration : Explaining and Understanding 60 Years of European Union Forest Policy-Making

This article looks at forest policy as empirical case study of European integration. By applying different theoretical lenses of European integration approaches (neo-functionalism, liberal intergovernmentalism, three institutionalist approaches and constructivism), it seeks to explain and understand the integration of forest policy in the European Union during the policys emergence (1958 to 1960s), expansion (1970 to late 1990s) and stabilization period (late 1990s to now). The findings clearly show that, to a certain extent, all European integration theories have their merits for the analysis. However, none of the employed integration theories alone can explain all the relevant aspects of the broader developments in EU forest policy. No individual theory can help explain why forest policy developed only incrementally and why it has been weakly institutionalized. This article, therefore, argues to combine them so as to establish a clearer picture of the driving factors and constraints. As each of the grand theories has its weak spots, it is further argued that scholars of European studies should work across a broader theoretical spectrum as only this would allow light to be shed on blind spots in empirical investigation over longer time periods.(VLID)331700

Core components of the international forest regime complex

From the existing full set of international policy instruments on forests eight core components are identified and submitted to two differing assessments. The first (consistency assessment) uses a policy design approach to match the core components with their goals, policy tools, target group preferences and justifications for the choice of goals and policy tools. The second (compatability assessment) examines the institutional inter-linkages of the core components. Both assessments reveal a series of challenges for international forest governance that can, however, be turned into opportunities. It is proposed that the coordination of and cooperation between the representatives of forest and non-forest users be strengthened at the national, regional and international levels, under the shared overarching idea of sustainable forest management, by means of ‘forests+’ policies. Forests+ policies go beyond the forest sector and acknowledge both the inter-sectoral character of forest policymaking and the importance of international regimes that have a decisive impact on forests but for which forests are not the main focus of attention

Core components of the international forest regime complex

From the existing full set of international policy instruments on forests, eight core components are identified and submitted to two differing assessments. The first (consistency assessment) uses a policy design approach to match the core components with their goals, policy tools, target group preferences and justifications for the choice of goals and policy tools. The second (compatibility assessment) examines the institutional inter-linkages of the core components. Both assessments reveal a series of challenges for international forest governance that can, however, be turned into opportunities. It is proposed that the coordination of and cooperation between the representatives of forest and non-forest users be strengthened at the national, regional and international levels, under the shared overarching idea of sustainable forest management, by means of ‘forests+’ policies. Forests+ policies go beyond the forest sector and acknowledge both the inter-sectoral character of forest policymaking and the importance of international regimes that have a decisive impact on forests but for which forests are not the main focus of attention

Getting a grip on negotiation processes: Addressing trade-offs in mountain biking in Austria, Germany and Switzerland

Space for recreation is an important service provided by forests close to urban and rural areas alike. Mountain biking, as one recreational activity, is increasingly becoming widespread, which can lead to challenging trade-off situations, as some benefits from forests come at the cost of another forest benefit and vice versa. For instance, illegally constructed mountain bike trails lead to trade-offs between environmental protection and other forest utilizations such as wood production. We thus study how such trade-off situations can be negotiated to find an outcome, such as a legal mountain bike trail, which is accepted by stakeholders. In doing so, we select case studies where we expect to find similar trade-off situations that lead to the negotiation process about mountain bike trails. Specifically, we analyse the cases' negotiation processes (action situations) by applying Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Our findings show the importance of collective actors, a clear delineation of responsibilities and of compensation and funding measures as well as structured workshops and collective site inspections for addressing trade-offs and for arriving at acceptable outcomes in our cases.ISSN:1389-934