12 research outputs found

    18th Century Political Satire as Exemplified by Jonathan Swift through Gulliver\u27s Travels

    Get PDF
    During the seventy-eight years of Jonathan Swift\u27s life, from 1667 to 1745, English satire was in its heyday. The stinging bit of the pen became recognized as one of the strongest political weapons, and those who possessed the natural gift of creating this weapon were sought high and low by those who desired to sway public opinion. There are really three main reasons why this period, in particular, was an age of satire. First, it was a time of radically changing values, when intensely held convictions were in conflict with each other, and a new world order was emerging. Second, a new style of writing developed that made a most effective satiric instrument. It was the style advocated by the new science which requires a simple, plain, clear, expository vehicle to describe the experiments of the newly formed Royal Society, which ironically enough, was the target of some of Swift\u27s most biting satire. As Dryden once said, With its neat clean strokes, satire could cut off a man\u27s head without knocking it from his shoulders. And third, politicians became aware for the first time that the writer, especially the satirist, could be a powerful weapon against the opposition. Political parties courted him. He acquired new dignity and status within the close-knit coffee house society of London. Yes, the satirist\u27s influence was considerable, and Jonathan Swift was one of the most influential satirists of this period

    Where Does Information Literacy Fit? Mapping the Core

    Get PDF
    This session covers a flexible, easy-to-adapt curriculum mapping method used by the University of North Texas Libraries to complete a core curriculum map. The University of North Texas is a large four-year public, Tier-1 research university with HSI status. The UNT Libraries provides a wide range of student- and faculty-centered initiatives that are integral to the UNT community. We mapped Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) on course syllabi to the AAC&U Information Literacy VALUE Rubric and the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. We identified key phrases and verbs from the two threshold documents, reviewed a sample of English syllabi to develop a code book to use in the analysis, and tested our coding methods by running a pilot coding project of Freshman-level, core composition courses. After the pilot was completed, we commenced coding the rest of the core syllabi. With information gleaned from this project, we know which core courses address which standards and frames. This understanding allows us to identify gaps in library instruction and address them through the work of our subject librarians and strategically targeted library instruction. Subject librarians present this information to their faculty and collaborate on how best to restructure how information literacy is taught in each department. This backward design allows each department to evaluate their student learning objectives and scaffold information literacy through research assignments. It also allows the departments to provide evidence on how their courses meets state, SACSCOC, and AAC&U requirements for accreditation

    Where Does Information Literacy Fit? Mapping the Core

    No full text
    A thrust towards collaborative professionalism is a growing trend in education because of its impacts on institutional community relationships and empowerment. Thus, ways must be sought to birth collaborative professionalism in institutions where such a culture is missing. The secondary school in this study is just such an institution. An interventional, mixed-methods study will be conducted using a pragmatic approach by engaging two interdepartmental teams to collaborate on cross-curricular, horizontal curriculum coherence. This topic was chosen because of a deficit many teachers have reported on - the perceived inability of students to transfer learning from one subject to another. I propose that this is due to the compartmentalized way in which they are taught. Initially, student opinions towards curriculum coherence will be sought through surveys. Thereafter, two Departmental Heads will each be engaged in working with one other Departmental Head to assign members of their teams to look for overlapping areas and ways to create coherence. Each team will be debriefed to gauge attitudes towards interdepartmental collaboration and prospects for future and ongoing collaborations. In addition, improvements in curricular coherence will be documented. A preliminary review of the literature revealed that initiatives to promote collaborative professionalism have generally been successful because many educators see a need for high levels of collaboration to improve their practice. Barriers experienced included cultures of autonomy, contrasting models of professionalism and prior professional development experiences which did not benefit educators as practitioners. The goal of this intervention is to create a desire for collaborative professionalism through a successful project, which may then spur more voluntary engagement with it
    corecore