12 research outputs found

    Solid State Proton Spin Relaxation in Ethylbenzenes: Methyl Reorientation Barriers and Molecular Structure

    Get PDF
    We have investigated the dynamics of the ethyl groups and their constituent methyl groups in polycrystalline ethylbenzene (EB), 1,2-diethylbenzene (1,2-DEB), 1,3-DEB, and 1,4-DEB using the solid state proton spin relaxation (SSPSR) technique. The temperature and Larmor frequency dependence of the Zeeman spin-lattice relaxation rate is reported and interpreted in terms of the molecular dynamics. We determine that only the methyl groups are reorienting on the nuclear magnetic resonance time scale. The observed barrier of about 12 kJ/mol for methyl group reorientation in the solid samples of EB, 1,2-DEB, and 1,3-DEB is consistent with that of the isolated molecule, implying that in the solid state, intermolecular electrostatic interactions play a minor role in determining the barrier. The lower barrier of 9.3 +/- 0.2 kJ/mol for the more symmetric 1,4-DEB suggests that the crystal structure is such that the minimum in the anisotropic part of the intramolecular potential is raised by the intermolecular interactions leading to a 3 kJ/mol decrease in the total barrier. We are able to conclude that the methyl group is well away from the plane of the benzene ring (most likely orthogonal to it) in all four molecules, and that in 1,2-DEB, the two ethyl groups are in the anticonfiguration. Our SSPSR results are compared with the results obtained by microwave spectroscopy and supersonic molecular jet laser spectroscopy, both of which determine molecular geometry better than SSPSR, but neither of which can determine ground electronic state barriers for these molecules

    Solid State Proton Spin Relaxation in Ethylbenzenes: Methyl Reorientation Barriers and Molecular Structure

    Get PDF
    We have investigated the dynamics of the ethyl groups and their constituent methyl groups in polycrystalline ethylbenzene (EB), 1,2-diethylbenzene (1,2-DEB), 1,3-DEB, and 1,4-DEB using the solid state proton spin relaxation (SSPSR) technique. The temperature and Larmor frequency dependence of the Zeeman spin-lattice relaxation rate is reported and interpreted in terms of the molecular dynamics. We determine that only the methyl groups are reorienting on the nuclear magnetic resonance time scale. The observed barrier of about 12 kJ/mol for methyl group reorientation in the solid samples of EB, 1,2-DEB, and 1,3-DEB is consistent with that of the isolated molecule, implying that in the solid state, intermolecular electrostatic interactions play a minor role in determining the barrier. The lower barrier of 9.3 +/- 0.2 kJ/mol for the more symmetric 1,4-DEB suggests that the crystal structure is such that the minimum in the anisotropic part of the intramolecular potential is raised by the intermolecular interactions leading to a 3 kJ/mol decrease in the total barrier. We are able to conclude that the methyl group is well away from the plane of the benzene ring (most likely orthogonal to it) in all four molecules, and that in 1,2-DEB, the two ethyl groups are in the anticonfiguration. Our SSPSR results are compared with the results obtained by microwave spectroscopy and supersonic molecular jet laser spectroscopy, both of which determine molecular geometry better than SSPSR, but neither of which can determine ground electronic state barriers for these molecules

    Early Tolerance Outcomes of Stereotactic Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation Therapy Concomitant with Pelvic Node Irradiation in High-risk Prostate Cancer

    No full text
    Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the toxicity of prostate and pelvic lymph node stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for high-risk prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Twenty-three patients with high-risk or lymph node-positive prostate cancer were treated with SBRT that delivered 37.5 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles, with concomitant treatment of the pelvic nodes to 25 Gy. In general, patients received neoadjuvant, concurrent, and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for a duration of 18 months. Toxicities were evaluated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. The median follow-up was 19 months (range, 3-48 months). Results: Acute grade 1 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were noted in 2 patients (9.1%). No patient experienced acute grade ≥2 GI toxicity. Acute genitourinary (GU) grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicities were observed in 7 patients (31.8%), 8 patients (36.4%), and 1 patient (4.5%), respectively. Late grade 2 GI and GU toxicities were observed in 2 patients (9.1%) and 6 patients (27.3%), respectively. No late grade ≥3 GI toxicity was noted. Late grade ≥3 GU (hemorrhagic cystitis) was noted in 1 patient (4.5%), which responded to laser fulguration. Conclusions: SBRT with pelvic lymph node radiation therapy was feasible and well tolerated. The incidence of grade ≥3 GU and GI toxicities was uncommon. Continued follow-up will be required to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of this approach for high-risk patients

    Modeling positioning uncertainties of prostate cancer external beam radiation therapy using pre-treatment data

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of treatment plan data and image guidance (IG) on positioning uncertainty during prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Body mass index (BMI), planning target volume (PTV), bladder volume (BV), and rectal cross section area (RCS) were collected for 267 consecutive PCa patients undergoing daily IGRT. Radiographic isocenter corrections to intra-prostatic fiducials for 12,490 treatment fractions were used to derive random (RE) and systematic (SE) inter-fraction uncertainties for the cardinal axes. These data were used to simulate RE and SE for weekly IG and Action Level (AL)-IG treatment protocols. RESULTS: SE and RE were 2–5 and 3–4 mm in the cardinal axes, respectively, during simulation of no IG. Without IG, positive correlations (p < 0.01) were noted for (1) anterior-posterior RE vs. RCS and BV and (2) cranio-caudal RE vs. RCS, BV and BMI. The RE increase was 3 mm for the highest quartile of RCS, BV and BMI. Daily IGRT eliminated this relationship. 3D IG corrections of 1 cm or more occured in 27% of treatment fractions and in 97% of patients. CONCLUSION: PCa patients with elevated pre-treatment BV, RCS and BMI have increased inter-fractionation positioning uncertainty and appear the primary candidates for daily IGRT
    corecore