Veneuze trombo-embolie : wanneer zijn laboratoriumtesten voor trombofilie zinvol?

Laboratoriumtesten voor trombofilieonderzoek worden vaak door de kliniek aangevraagd na het optreden van veneuze trombo-embolie. Indien afwijkingen worden gevonden leidt dit niet altijd tot klinische consequenties, zoals verlenging van antistollingstherapie. In de eind 2007 vastgestelde CBO-richtlijn ‘diagnostiek, preventie en behandeling van veneuze trombo-embolie en secundaire preventie arteriële trombose’ staan wetenschappelijk onderbouwde richtlijnen beschreven voor situaties waarbij het bepalen van trombofiliefactoren zinvol is en invloed heeft op het klinisch handelen. In dit artikel wordt de consequentie van deze richtlijn voor de laboratoria beschreven. Grofweg komt het erop neer dat voor de meeste patiënten met een eerste of recidief veneuze trombo-embolie het bepalen van trombofiliefactoren anders dan antifosfolipide-antistoffen geen therapeutische consequenties heeft en daarom wordt afgeraden. Slechts in uitzonderlijke gevallen wordt het bepalen van trombofiliefactoren wel overwogen. Daarbij is het van belang dat rekening gehouden wordt met preanalytische factoren die de uitslag van trombofilietesten kunnen beïnvloeden

Clinical characteristics of women captured by extending the definition of severe postpartum haemorrhage with 'refractoriness to treatment': a cohort study

Background: The absence of a uniform and clinically relevant definition of severe postpartum haemorrhage hampers comparative studies and optimization of clinical management. The concept of persistent postpartum haemorrhage, based on refractoriness to initial first-line treatment, was proposed as an alternative to common definitions that are either based on estimations of blood loss or transfused units of packed red blood cells (RBC). We compared characteristics and outcomes of women with severe postpartum haemorrhage captured by these three types of definitions. Methods: In this large retrospective cohort study in 61 hospitals in the Netherlands we included 1391 consecutive women with postpartum haemorrhage who received either ≥4 units of RBC or a multicomponent transfusion. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of women with severe postpartum haemorrhage defined as persistent postpartum haemorrhage were compared to definitions based on estimated blood loss or transfused units of RBC within 24 h following birth. Adverse maternal outcome was a composite of maternal mortality, hysterectomy, arterial embolisation and intensive care unit admission. Results: One thousand two hundred sixty out of 1391 women (90.6%) with postpartum haemorrhage fulfilled the definition of persistent postpartum haemorrhage. The majority, 820/1260 (65.1%), fulfilled this definition within 1 h following birth, compared to 819/1391 (58.7%) applying the definition of ≥1 L blood loss and 37/845 (4.4%) applying the definition of ≥4 units of RBC. The definition persistent postpartum haemorrhage captured 430/471 adverse maternal outcomes (91.3%), compared to 471/471 (100%) for ≥1 L blood loss and 383/471 (81.3%) for ≥4 units of RBC. Persistent postpartum haemorrhage did not capture all adverse outcomes because of missing data on timing of initial, first-line treatment. Conclusion: The definition persistent postpartum haemo

The importance of anticoagulant agents in measuring platelet aggregation in patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin.

Contains fulltext : 70744.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access

Point-of-care platelet function testing in patients undergoing PCI: between a rock and a hard place

Since recent studies have linked an impaired response to antiplatelet therapy with a higher incidence of atherothrombotic events, the monitoring of the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in the individual patient has attracted much attention. In the present report, we demonstrate that platelet function testing with several point-of-care assays results in ambiguous and conflicting results: some assays indicated that the patient’s platelets were insufficiently inhibited by clopidogrel whereas other assays reported an adequate response. Therefore, platelet function assays should not be used solely to guide treatment decisions, and tailor-made antithrombotic treatment has to wait for the most predictive platelet function test to emerge for measuring the risk for thrombotic complications after stenting. Until then, daily clinical practice should not be guided by point-of-care platelet function testing. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:299-305.)

Population pharmacodynamic model for low molecular weight heparin nadroparin in morbidly obese and non-obese patients using anti-Xa levels as endpoint

In absence of specific dosing guidelines, the optimal dose of low molecular weight heparins for thrombosis prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients (BMI>40 kg/m(2)) remains unknown. In order to guide dosing in this patient group, a pharmacodynamics model is developed for nadroparin in morbidly obese and non-obese patients using anti-Xa levels as an endpoint, thereby characterizing the influence of excessive body weight on different pharmacodynamic model parameters.\nTwenty-eight morbidly obese and seven non-obese patients receiving 5700 IU and 2850 IU subcutaneous (s.c.) nadroparin for surgery, respectively, were included with a mean total body weight (TBW) of 135 kg (range 72-252 kg). Up to 11 anti-Xa levels were collected from the start until 24 h after nadroparin administration. Population pharmacodynamic modelling with covariate analysis was performed using NONMEM.\nIn a two-compartment pharmacodynamic model with baseline endogenous anti-Xa levels, the effect of nadroparin was found to be delayed and could be best described using a transit compartment. TBW was the most predictive covariate for clearance (CL=23.0 mL/min × (TBW/70)), while lean body weight (LBW) proved the most predictive covariate for central volume of distribution (V1=7.0 L × (LBW/60)).\nA pharmacodynamic model was developed characterizing anti-Xa levels after s.c. administration of nadroparin in patients weighing between 72 and 252 kg with TBW and LBW as the major determinants for clearance and volume of distribution, respectively.\nPURPOSE\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSIONSPharmacolog

The Total Thrombus Formation (T-TAS) platelet (PL) assay, a novel test that evaluates whole blood platelet thrombus formation under physiological conditions

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin, and a P2Y12 inhibitor) reduces thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The T-TAS PL assay uses arterial shear flow over collagen surface, better mimicking in vivo conditions compared to conventional agonist-based platelet function assays, to evaluate platelet function. Here, the platelet function in patients taking DAPT is evaluated with the T-TAS PL assay. In 57 patients with CAD, taking DAPT ≥7 days (n = 22 for clopidogrel, n = 15 for prasugrel, n = 20 for ticagrelor), T-TAS PL assessments were performed in duplicate, and expressed as area under the flow pressure curve within a 10-minute period (AUC10). The duplicate measurements were strongly correlated (r = 0.90, p < .001), with an intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 11,5%. For clopidogrel, the median AUC10 was 11.5 (IQR5.9–41.8), for prasugrel 28.8 (IQR10.3–37.6), and for ticagrelor 8.9 (IQR 6.4–10.9). All measurements were below the AUC10 cutoff of 260 measured in healthy volunteers, suggesting excellent discrimination of DAPT-treated and untreated persons. The new T-TAS PL assay demonstrated complete discrimination of platelet function in patients on DAPT based on an established cutoff. Ticagrelor showed lower levels of platelet function and a more uniform response compared to prasugrel and clopidogrel