57 research outputs found

    On the distribution of sums of residues

    Get PDF
    We generalize and solve the \roman{mod}\,q analogue of a problem of Littlewood and Offord, raised by Vaughan and Wooley, concerning the distribution of the 2n2^n sums of the form i=1nεiai\sum_{i=1}^n\varepsilon_ia_i, where each εi\varepsilon_i is 00 or 11. For all qq, nn, kk we determine the maximum, over all reduced residues aia_i and all sets PP consisting of kk arbitrary residues, of the number of these sums that belong to PP.Comment: 5 page

    Poset-free Families and Lubell-boundedness

    Full text link
    Given a finite poset PP, we consider the largest size \lanp of a family \F of subsets of [n]:={1,...,n}[n]:=\{1,...,n\} that contains no subposet PP. This continues the study of the asymptotic growth of \lanp; it has been conjectured that for all PP, \pi(P):= \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \lanp/\nchn exists and equals a certain integer, e(P)e(P). While this is known to be true for paths, and several more general families of posets, for the simple diamond poset \D_2, the existence of π\pi frustratingly remains open. Here we develop theory to show that π(P)\pi(P) exists and equals the conjectured value e(P)e(P) for many new posets PP. We introduce a hierarchy of properties for posets, each of which implies π=e\pi=e, and some implying more precise information about \lanp. The properties relate to the Lubell function of a family \F of subsets, which is the average number of times a random full chain meets \F. We present an array of examples and constructions that possess the properties

    No four subsets forming an N

    Get PDF
    AbstractWe survey results concerning the maximum size of a family F of subsets of an n-element set such that a certain configuration is avoided. When F avoids a chain of size two, this is just Sperner's theorem. Here we give bounds on how large F can be such that no four distinct sets A,B,C,D∈F satisfy A⊂B, C⊂B, C⊂D. In this case, the maximum size satisfies (n⌊n2⌋)(1+1n+Ω(1n2))⩽|F|⩽(n⌊n2⌋)(1+2n+O(1n2)), which is very similar to the best-known bounds for the more restrictive problem of F avoiding three sets B,C,D such that C⊂B, C⊂D

    Diamond-free Families

    Get PDF
    Given a finite poset P, we consider the largest size La(n,P) of a family of subsets of [n]:={1,...,n}[n]:=\{1,...,n\} that contains no subposet P. This problem has been studied intensively in recent years, and it is conjectured that π(P):=limnLa(n,P)/nchoosen/2\pi(P):= \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} La(n,P)/{n choose n/2} exists for general posets P, and, moreover, it is an integer. For k2k\ge2 let \D_k denote the kk-diamond poset {A<B1,...,Bk<C}\{A< B_1,...,B_k < C\}. We study the average number of times a random full chain meets a PP-free family, called the Lubell function, and use it for P=\D_k to determine \pi(\D_k) for infinitely many values kk. A stubborn open problem is to show that \pi(\D_2)=2; here we make progress by proving \pi(\D_2)\le 2 3/11 (if it exists).Comment: 16 page

    Labeling Graphs with a Condition at Distance 2

    Get PDF
    Given a simple graph G (V, E) and a positive number d, an Ld(2, 1)-labelling of G is a function f V(G) [0, oc) such that whenever x, y E V are adjacent, If(x)- f(Y)l&gt;- 2d, and whenever the distance between x and y is two, If(x) f(Y)l&gt;- d. The Ld(2, 1)-labelling number A(G, d) is the smallest number m such that G has an Ld(2, 1)-labelling f with max{f(v) v E V} m. It is shown that to determine A(G, d), it suffices to study the case when d 1 and the labelling is nonnegative integral-valued. Let A(G) A(G, 1). The labelling numbers of special classes of graphs, e.g., A(C) 4 for any cycle C, are described. It is shown that for graphs of maximum degree A, A(G)
    corecore