18 research outputs found

    The flora and vegetation of Sosnovets Island, the White Sea

    Get PDF
    The flora and vegetation of Sosnovets Island (White Sea Throat, Murmansk Region, Russia) has been studied and described in detail. This is a small island situated within the tundra zone, largely covered by a permafrost peatland with the presence of flarks, a palsa mire, and rock outcrops. Vascular plants of Sosnovets Island include 167 species and subspecies, of which 134 species and subspecies are considered native and 33 species are alien. The number of tundra species is higher and that of boreal species is lower than on the other White Sea islands; a few species with eastern distributions in East Europe are present; 6 protected species are recorded. Alien species were mostly transported from Arkhangelsk Region but partly from Central Russia; main pathways were forage, construction and gardens; one species (Alchemilla cymatophylla) was likely introduced as a polemochore. The vegetation of Sosnovets Island is represented by a complex of lichen, dwarfshrub, cottongrass-sphagnous and sedge-sphagnous communities of the peatland, which covers the major part of the island, as well as dwarf-shrub and lichen tundras, coastal vegetation, willow thickets, dwarf cornel (Cornus suecica) and secondary anthropogenic meadows and grasslands. A palsa mire, marshes with Calamagrostis deschampsioides, highly dissected peatlands with cloudberry-crowberry-lichen communities on elevated sites and cottongrass-sphagnous communities in depressions are the unique features of the island’s vegetation.Peer reviewe

    ЕвразийскиС элиты: состояниС ΠΈ пСрспСктивы развития

    Get PDF
    Π’ соврСмСнных гСополитичСских условиях ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ° исслСдований ΠΈ выстраивания ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ элитообразования ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡƒΡŽ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ. Π‘ΠΎ смСной ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ лидСрства БША Ρ€Π°ΡΡˆΠΈΡ€ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ институты Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ мирохозяйствСнного ΡƒΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π°, ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ взаимосвязи ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ. Π“Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ рСгионализация Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ прСдпосылки Ρ€Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Свразийском пространствС, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°Ρ процСссы развития Евразийской ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ†ΠΈΠΈ элит. Евразийство ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ историко-философская ΠΈ политичСская тСория ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π΅Ρ‚ Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ очСртания ΠΈ толкования. БущСствСнно возрастаСт гСополитичСский ΠΈ - экономичСский ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π» стран Евразийского ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΉ обосновываСт Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ встраивания этих государств Π² систСму сопряТСния глобального ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ сотрудничСства, ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ потрСбностям развития Π²Π½ΡƒΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΈΡ… ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅ΡˆΠ½ΠΈΡ… Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ элит. Π Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π΅ΡΡ СвразийскоС пространство, Π² Π°Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π²Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ экономики ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΊΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΎ-Ρ†ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Ρ‹ ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ (ΠšΠΈΡ‚Π°ΠΉ, Индия, страны АБЕАН, ШОБ, ЕАЭБ ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€.), Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π³ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ‚ практичСски всС сфСры ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ насСлСния ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π΅Ρ‚Ρ‹, ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ·Π³Π»Π°ΡˆΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΠΏ Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚Ρ‹Ρ€Π΅Ρ… свобод - свободы двиТСния Ρ‚ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ², услуг, ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»Π° ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΉ силы. Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ процСссы Π²Ρ‹ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠΏΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ Π² систСмС формирования Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ элитообразования. Π’ Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ… Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ СвразийскоС пространство ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Ρ€Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π² Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… аспСктах, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π² ΡƒΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ (Евразийский экономичСский союз, страны постсовСтского пространства ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€.), Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ, исходя ΠΈΠ· Π°Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π΅Π³ΠΎ развития (страны Шанхайской ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ сотрудничСства, Π‘ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΠΎΠ΅ ЕвразийскоС партнёрство). ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ ΡƒΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ вопросам ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ развития Евразийского экономичСского союза (ЕАЭБ) Π²ΠΎ взаимосвязи с государствами БодруТСства НСзависимых Государств (БНГ) ΠΈ ШОБ

    Management of groundwater resources in transboundary territories (on the example of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Estonia)

    Get PDF
    Groundwater, Β as a source of water supply, the most important mineral and geopolitical resource, , is often the only source of high-quality drinking water that is protected from pollution under conditions of increasing deterioration of surface water quality. Transboundary groundwaters are the focus of hydrogeological researchers for a number of reasons, including the reduction and pollution of water resources as a result of economic activities. The increased controversy between states over transboundary water issues has necessitated Β the development of international legal documents on issues related to water conflict prevention and the sustainable use of fresh water. As part of the analysis of the problem of legal regulation of groundwater extraction from transboundary aquifers and complexes, it is proposed to consider this aspect on the example of Russia. The problems of regulation of rational use and protection of fresh water in the bilateral Β treaties of the Russian Federation were revealed; a methodology for the management of groundwater extraction in the territory of the transboundary aquifer Β was developed, the size, parameters, and factors influencing the formation of the transboundary zone have been determined (based on research and analysis of water intake activities in the border areas of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Estonia) were determined

    Π­Π»ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹ Π² соврСмСнном ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΌ пространствС

    Get PDF
    ЦСль настоящСй ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠΈ – исслСдованиС Π±Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… основ Π½Π°ΡƒΡ‡Π½ΠΎ-мСтодичСского Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ качСства элит, ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ унивСрситСтом Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ‚-Π“Π°Π»Π»Π΅Π½Π° (ШвСйцария), ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ использованиС для ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ качСствСнного состояния Π½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… элит ЕвропСйского ΠΈ Евразийского экономичСского союзов Π½Π° основС ранТирования, входящих Π² Π½ΠΈΡ… государств. ΠžΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ шагами достиТСния Ρ†Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ процСссы изучСния: элит Π² соврСмСнных ΡΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… исслСдованиях, структурной ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ состояния элит, Β«Π±Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Β» ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ†Ρ‹ создания цСнности, ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… характСристик элитного качСства. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ тСорСтичСского Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ интСрСс ΠΊ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅, которая ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Ρ€Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ с Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… (политичСских) ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠΉ, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π² условиях фактичСского формирования многополярного миропорядка (гСоэкономичСского полоТСния). ΠšΠΎΠ½Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρ‹ ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ историчСскими процСссами, Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ государств ΠΈ соврСмСнных элит, ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ…ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ допускаСт ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ условности. Богласно ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌ формирования индСкса качСства элит ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-экономичСской ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ воздСйствия элитного качСства Π½Π° общСствСнноС Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ΡΡ ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ комбинация Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, Β«Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠ°Β» ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Ρ… осущСствляСтся Π½Π° основС экспСртных ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ участников. Π‘Ρ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· позволяСт ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎ ΡΡƒΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ. ΠŸΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΡƒ прСдлагаСмая мСтодология нуТдаСтся Π² ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ инструмСнтария ΠΈ использовании Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², прСдставлСнных, Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€, Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ Ρ€Π΅ΠΉΡ‚ΠΈΠ½Π³Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡŽ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π½ΠΈΡŽ, Π’Π’ΠŸ Π½Π° Π΄ΡƒΡˆΡƒ насСлСния ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€

    Modern Trends in the Field of Solving Transboundary Problems in Groundwater Extraction

    No full text
    The intensive exploitation of water resources negatively affects the ecological situation in many international water objects. The problem of a shortage of drinking water is aggravating, water bodies are subject to pollution by domestic and industrial wastewater, and the water quality in the basins of international water courses continues to deteriorate. This situation primarily requires legal regulation. Until recently, despite a significant number of existing international treaties on the use of transboundary waters, there was no universal international legal act to systematize the basic principles and norms of behavior of the states in this area. The most important direction for improving public administration in the field of use and protection of transboundary groundwater bodies is the development and expansion of international cooperation and the legal consolidation of the rights and obligations of states through the adoption of legislative acts on various levels. Modern international policy in the field of transboundary groundwater resources management is undergoing significant changes. The very concept of a transboundary territory in relation to groundwater extraction was adopted both in Russia and in Europe in the early 2000s. However, the main criteria for the definition of a transboundary territory have not yet been formulated anywhere. This gives rise to the need to define a transboundary aquifer in international legislation, as well as to limit the size of this aquifer. This paper is devoted to the analysis of approaches to the definition of β€œtransboundary aquifer”, emerging problems in this area, the legal framework, and conflicts in the field of transboundary regulation of groundwater. The zone of responsibility in groundwater extraction at the transboundary territory of neighboring states is defined

    STRATEGIC ISSUES GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION MANAGEMENT IN RUSSIA

    No full text
    Water is a key component of our environment; it is a renewable, limited and vulnerable natural resource, which provides economic, social, and environmental well-being of the population. The most promising source of drinking water supply is groundwater usage. Drinking and industrial groundwater is one of the most important components of the groundwater mineral resource base in the Russian Federation. Modern system of groundwater extraction management and state regulation is currently imperfect and has definite disadvantages, among them - lack of control over natural resources by the state, an old system of tax rates for the use of groundwater, commercialization stage of licensing, the budget deficit, which is passed on other spheres of the national economy. This article provides general information about the state of groundwater production and supply in Russia, negative trends of groundwater usage, some actions for the improvement in the system of groundwater’s fund management are suggested. The most important amendments of the law β€œAbout mineral resources” are overviewed, effects of these changes are revealed and recommendations for future groundwater extraction regulation are given

    Possibilities of Using the Unitization Model in the Development of Transboundary Groundwater Deposits

    No full text
    Groundwater belongs to the category of strategic minerals, along with hydrocarbon resources, so the supply of drinking water will become one of the urgent problems of modern society. The management of groundwater resources and their protection is a very complicated task, especially in border areas where neighboring states jointly exploit aquifers. The problem of transboundary water resources management, in particular groundwater, has been considered at the international level for more than 30 years. However, despite the adoption of a number of conventions, agreements and programs, both at the global and in the format of interstate relations, an understanding for the approach of a universal solution to the transboundary water issue has not yet been formed. An attempt to study the possibilities of applying the principles of unitization on the example of transboundary oil and gas fields in comparison with groundwater cross-border deposits is made in the paper for the first time. As a successful example, the unitization agreement between Norway and the UK for the development of the Frigg field was chosen. It is established that unitization agreements concluded by states in the joint development of transboundary mineral deposits, actively used in regulating the activities of transboundary oil and gas fields, can be used as one of the possible models of international agreements on the extraction of groundwater in transboundary territories

    Some Aspects of Groundwater Resources Management in Transboundary Areas

    No full text
    According to UN experts, by 2030, about half of the world’s population will suffer from a shortage of fresh water, which may cause future hostilities and conflicts. In this regard, extraction of such a valuable mineral as groundwater must be rationally managed. However, practice has shown that managing and protecting the groundwater resources is a very challenging task. As part of the analysis pertaining to the problem of legal regulation of groundwater extraction from transboundary aquifers and complexes, it is proposed to consider this aspect on the example of Russia. The problems of regulation of rational use and protection of fresh water in the bilateral agreements of the Russian Federation were identified; a methodology for managing groundwater extraction in the territory of a transboundary aquifer was developed, dimensions, parameters and factors affecting the formation of a transboundary zone were determined (using the example of research and analysis of water intake activities in the border territories of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Estonia)

    First building engineers in architectural practice of St. Petersburg at the beginning of the 19th century

    No full text
    The emergence of the specialty of civil engineer in the first half of the 19th century had a significant impact on architectural practice in St. Petersburg. The differentiation of the professions of engineer and architect took place for the first time; both specialists began to participate in the design. The appearance of such engineers as Augustine Betancourt, Matvey Clark, Pierre-Dominique Bazin and Wilhelm von Tretter brought about changes in all areas of architecture and construction. New building structures and materials appeared, as well as methods for checking and calculating. Designing has become comprehensive, the activities of the Committee for Structures and Hydraulic Works led by Betancourt covered urban development, individual buildings and all types of utilities. The formation of engineering education took place, which brought up the next generation of Russian engineers.The article considers the most important aspects of the activities of Augustine Betancourt, who laid the foundations for engineering education in Russia; Matvey Clark, who created the first metal beams and trusses; Pierre Dominique Bazin, who continued the development of engineering education, as well as Wilhelm von Tretter, one of the founders of iron bridge construction in Russia
    corecore