18 research outputs found
The flora and vegetation of Sosnovets Island, the White Sea
The flora and vegetation of Sosnovets Island (White Sea Throat, Murmansk Region, Russia) has been studied and described in detail. This is a small island situated within the tundra zone, largely covered by a permafrost peatland with the presence of flarks, a palsa mire, and rock outcrops. Vascular plants of Sosnovets Island include 167 species and subspecies, of which 134 species and subspecies are considered native and 33 species are alien. The number of tundra species is higher and that of boreal species is lower than on the other White Sea islands; a few species with eastern distributions in East Europe are present; 6 protected species are recorded. Alien species were mostly transported from Arkhangelsk Region but partly from Central Russia; main pathways were forage, construction and gardens; one species (Alchemilla cymatophylla) was likely introduced as a polemochore. The vegetation of Sosnovets Island is represented by a complex of lichen, dwarfshrub, cottongrass-sphagnous and sedge-sphagnous communities of the peatland, which covers the major part of the island, as well as dwarf-shrub and lichen tundras, coastal vegetation, willow thickets, dwarf cornel (Cornus suecica) and secondary anthropogenic meadows and grasslands. A palsa mire, marshes with Calamagrostis deschampsioides, highly dissected peatlands with cloudberry-crowberry-lichen communities on elevated sites and cottongrass-sphagnous communities in depressions are the unique features of the islandβs vegetation.Peer reviewe
ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ: ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ
Π ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠ°ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ. Π‘ΠΎ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π‘Π¨Π ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π°, ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ»ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π΅Π²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ.
ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π‘ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ - ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΡΡΡΠ°ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ² Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ.
Π Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ΡΡ Π΅Π²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ, Π² Π°ΡΠ΅Π°Π»Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ Π²Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡ
ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ (ΠΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉ, ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΈΡ, ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ, Π¨ΠΠ‘, ΠΠΠΠ‘ ΠΈ Π΄Ρ.), Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π΅ΡΡ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ·Π³Π»Π°ΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΄ - ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΎΠ², ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³, ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΈΠ»Ρ.
Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π΅Π²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°Ρ
, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π² ΡΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ (ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠ·, ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π΄Ρ.), ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΠ· Π°ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΎΠ² Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ (ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ Π¨Π°Π½Ρ
Π°ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ΅ ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ). ΠΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π° (ΠΠΠΠ‘) Π²ΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π‘ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΠ΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΠΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ² (Π‘ΠΠ) ΠΈ Π¨ΠΠ‘
Management of groundwater resources in transboundary territories (on the example of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Estonia)
Groundwater, Β as a source of water supply, the most important mineral and geopolitical resource, , is often the only source of high-quality drinking water that is protected from pollution under conditions of increasing deterioration of surface water quality. Transboundary groundwaters are the focus of hydrogeological researchers for a number of reasons, including the reduction and pollution of water resources as a result of economic activities. The increased controversy between states over transboundary water issues has necessitated Β the development of international legal documents on issues related to water conflict prevention and the sustainable use of fresh water. As part of the analysis of the problem of legal regulation of groundwater extraction from transboundary aquifers and complexes, it is proposed to consider this aspect on the example of Russia. The problems of regulation of rational use and protection of fresh water in the bilateral Β treaties of the Russian Federation were revealed; a methodology for the management of groundwater extraction in the territory of the transboundary aquifer Β was developed, the size, parameters, and factors influencing the formation of the transboundary zone have been determined (based on research and analysis of water intake activities in the border areas of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Estonia) were determined
ΠΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅
Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ β ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ-ΠΠ°Π»Π»Π΅Π½Π° (Π¨Π²Π΅ΠΉΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ), ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΠ²ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠ·ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ°Π½ΠΆΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π²Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π² Π½ΠΈΡ
Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ².
ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°Π³Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ: ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
, ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ, Β«Π±Π°ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Β» ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊ ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°.
Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΊ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
(ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
) ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΊΠ° (Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ). ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ.
Π‘ΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π½Π° ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, Β«Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠ°Β» ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ². Π‘ΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎ ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ Π½ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ, Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΠΠ Π½Π° Π΄ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π΄Ρ
Modern Trends in the Field of Solving Transboundary Problems in Groundwater Extraction
The intensive exploitation of water resources negatively affects the ecological situation in many international water objects. The problem of a shortage of drinking water is aggravating, water bodies are subject to pollution by domestic and industrial wastewater, and the water quality in the basins of international water courses continues to deteriorate. This situation primarily requires legal regulation. Until recently, despite a significant number of existing international treaties on the use of transboundary waters, there was no universal international legal act to systematize the basic principles and norms of behavior of the states in this area. The most important direction for improving public administration in the field of use and protection of transboundary groundwater bodies is the development and expansion of international cooperation and the legal consolidation of the rights and obligations of states through the adoption of legislative acts on various levels. Modern international policy in the field of transboundary groundwater resources management is undergoing significant changes. The very concept of a transboundary territory in relation to groundwater extraction was adopted both in Russia and in Europe in the early 2000s. However, the main criteria for the definition of a transboundary territory have not yet been formulated anywhere. This gives rise to the need to define a transboundary aquifer in international legislation, as well as to limit the size of this aquifer. This paper is devoted to the analysis of approaches to the definition of βtransboundary aquiferβ, emerging problems in this area, the legal framework, and conflicts in the field of transboundary regulation of groundwater. The zone of responsibility in groundwater extraction at the transboundary territory of neighboring states is defined
STRATEGIC ISSUES GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION MANAGEMENT IN RUSSIA
Water is a key component of our environment; it is a renewable, limited and vulnerable natural resource, which provides economic, social, and environmental well-being of the population. The most promising source of drinking water supply is groundwater usage. Drinking and industrial groundwater is one of the most important components of the groundwater mineral resource base in the Russian Federation. Modern system of groundwater extraction management and state regulation is currently imperfect and has definite disadvantages, among them - lack of control over natural resources by the state, an old system of tax rates for the use of groundwater, commercialization stage of licensing, the budget deficit, which is passed on other spheres of the national economy. This article provides general information about the state of groundwater production and supply in Russia, negative trends of groundwater usage, some actions for the improvement in the system of groundwaterβs fund management are suggested. The most important amendments of the law βAbout mineral resourcesβ are overviewed, effects of these changes are revealed and recommendations for future groundwater extraction regulation are given
Possibilities of Using the Unitization Model in the Development of Transboundary Groundwater Deposits
Groundwater belongs to the category of strategic minerals, along with hydrocarbon resources, so the supply of drinking water will become one of the urgent problems of modern society. The management of groundwater resources and their protection is a very complicated task, especially in border areas where neighboring states jointly exploit aquifers. The problem of transboundary water resources management, in particular groundwater, has been considered at the international level for more than 30 years. However, despite the adoption of a number of conventions, agreements and programs, both at the global and in the format of interstate relations, an understanding for the approach of a universal solution to the transboundary water issue has not yet been formed. An attempt to study the possibilities of applying the principles of unitization on the example of transboundary oil and gas fields in comparison with groundwater cross-border deposits is made in the paper for the first time. As a successful example, the unitization agreement between Norway and the UK for the development of the Frigg field was chosen. It is established that unitization agreements concluded by states in the joint development of transboundary mineral deposits, actively used in regulating the activities of transboundary oil and gas fields, can be used as one of the possible models of international agreements on the extraction of groundwater in transboundary territories
Some Aspects of Groundwater Resources Management in Transboundary Areas
According to UN experts, by 2030, about half of the worldβs population will suffer from a shortage of fresh water, which may cause future hostilities and conflicts. In this regard, extraction of such a valuable mineral as groundwater must be rationally managed. However, practice has shown that managing and protecting the groundwater resources is a very challenging task. As part of the analysis pertaining to the problem of legal regulation of groundwater extraction from transboundary aquifers and complexes, it is proposed to consider this aspect on the example of Russia. The problems of regulation of rational use and protection of fresh water in the bilateral agreements of the Russian Federation were identified; a methodology for managing groundwater extraction in the territory of a transboundary aquifer was developed, dimensions, parameters and factors affecting the formation of a transboundary zone were determined (using the example of research and analysis of water intake activities in the border territories of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Estonia)
First building engineers in architectural practice of St. Petersburg at the beginning of the 19th century
The emergence of the specialty of civil engineer in the first half of the 19th century had a significant impact on architectural practice in St. Petersburg. The differentiation of the professions of engineer and architect took place for the first time; both specialists began to participate in the design. The appearance of such engineers as Augustine Betancourt, Matvey Clark, Pierre-Dominique Bazin and Wilhelm von Tretter brought about changes in all areas of architecture and construction. New building structures and materials appeared, as well as methods for checking and calculating. Designing has become comprehensive, the activities of the Committee for Structures and Hydraulic Works led by Betancourt covered urban development, individual buildings and all types of utilities. The formation of engineering education took place, which brought up the next generation of Russian engineers.The article considers the most important aspects of the activities of Augustine Betancourt, who laid the foundations for engineering education in Russia; Matvey Clark, who created the first metal beams and trusses; Pierre Dominique Bazin, who continued the development of engineering education, as well as Wilhelm von Tretter, one of the founders of iron bridge construction in Russia