Rango geográfico y estructura espacial de linajes genéticos en Sophora linearifolia (Fabaceae), un arbusto endémico de las sierras centrales de Argentina.

Geographical range and spatial structure of genetic lineages in Sophora linearifolia (Fabaceae), an endemic shrub of Central Argentina. A large number of endemic species occur in the Sierras of Córdoba and San Luis. A significant group of them shows a disjunct geographic distribution between these two mountain regions. Until the present study, there were none genetic studies that allow us to infer historical processes underlying this geographical pattern. For this purpose, we characterize the distribution area and phylogeographic patterns of Sophora linearifolia, across its geographic range which includes Sierras Chicas (SC) and Cumbres de Gaspar (CG) in Córdoba and in the southwesternarea of Sierras of San Luis (SL). We compared the current with the predicted species area of distribution using ecological niche modelling analysis. We also analyzed genetic variability and spatial structure of the DNA chloroplast marker trnH-psbA, and reconstructed the genealogical relationships among theretrieved haplotypes. Current and the predicted distribution agreed in showing a climatic/topographic disjunction between Sierras of Cordoba and San Luis hills, although the current distribution presents a disjunction between SC and CG in Córdoba, not shown in the potential distribution map. We obtained eight haplotypes with restricted distribution and low levels of genetic differentiation that were grouped into four phylogroups: SC, CG and two in SL. Our results indicate that S. linearifolia presents low dispersal  ability and it would have recently diversified, suggesting a neoendemic taxon.Las sierras de Córdoba y San Luis albergan una gran riqueza de especies endémicas. Un grupo importante de ellas muestra una distribución disyunta entre ambas serranías. Hasta la actualidad no existían estudios genéticos que permitieran inferir procesos históricos asociados a este patrón. Con este propósito caracterizamos el área de distribución y el patrón filogeográfico de Sophora linearifolia, abarcando todo su rango geográfico que incluye las Sierras Chicas (SC) y las Cumbres de Gaspar (CG) en Córdoba y el suroeste de las Sierras de San Luis (SL). Contrastamos la distribución actual con la distribución predicha a partir del modelado del nicho ecológico. Analizamos el nivel de variabilidad genética, la estructuración espacial del marcador de ADN plastidial trnH-psbA y reconstruimos las relaciones genealógicas entre los haplotipos. La distribución actual y la predicha mostraron una disyunción entre Córdoba y San Luis, pero la distribución actual presentó una disyunción entre SC y CG que no fue modelada en la distribución potencial. Se obtuvieron 8 haplotipos de distribución restringida con bajos niveles de diferenciación genética agrupados en 4 filogrupos: SC, CG y dos en SL. Nuestros resultados indican que S. linearifolia presentaría baja capacidad de dispersión y que se habría diversificado recientemente, sugiriendo que se trataría de un neoendemismo

Dos nuevas citas de Polystichum (Dryopteridaceae) para la flora Argentina

Two new records of Polystichum (Dryopteridaceae) for the Argentine Flora. In this paper, two new records for the Argentina fern-flora are reported: P. subintegerrimum (Hook. & Arn.) R. Rodr. found in the Patagonian Forests and P. platylepis Fée collected in Misiones; both have been considered endemic for Chile and Brazil, respectively. The species are described and illustrated. KeyEn este trabajo, dos nuevos taxones de Polystichum se registran para la flora de helechos de Argentina: P. subintegerrimum (Hook. & Arn.) R. Rodr. hallado en la región de los Bosques Patagónicos y P. platylepis Fée colectado en Misiones; hasta ahora, ambas especies eran consideradas endémicas de Chile y Brasil, respectivamente. Se describen e ilustran ambas especies

La vegetación de las montañas de Córdoba (Argentina) a comienzos del siglo XXI: un mapa base para el ordenamiento territorial.

Background and aims: A detailed and updated vegetation map is necessary to land use planning. Given the need for a land-use plan for the Córdoba mountains, we decided to: make a vegetation map of these mountains; describe the vegetation of the mapped classes; interpret their distribution along the elevation gradient, and discuss the implications for land use planning. M&M: We elaborated a preliminary map from satellite images and field information, where we discriminate 14 vegetation units. Then, after a field control, we performed the final map, grouping the vegetation units into seven classes. Results: In the final map we identified: native forests, exotic forests, native scrublands, grasslands, lawns, grasslands with rock and/or bare soil and rocky areas. These classes were discriminated with an overall 82.6% precision. In addition, we separated water bodies, flood areas, crops and urban areas. The scrublands were the most widespread class, covering 37% of the landscape, followed by crops, covering 23% of the territory. Native forests only occupied 5.5% of the area. Scrublands and forests decreased along the elevation gradient, while grasslands and rocky areas increased.  Conclusions: We suggest that land use planning should promote the restoration of native forests to occupy 20-40% of the landscape, the control of the advance of urban areas and crops, and the management of invasive alien species to limit their expansion.Introducción y objetivos: Un mapa de vegetación detallado y actualizado es clave para el ordenamiento territorial. Dada la necesidad de un ordenamiento para las Sierras de Córdoba, nos propusimos: confeccionar un mapa de vegetación de estas montañas; describir la vegetación de las clases identificadas; interpretar su distribución a lo largo del gradiente altitudinal y discutir las implicancias para el ordenamiento territorial. M&M: Construimos un mapa preliminar a partir de imágenes satelitales e información de campo, donde discriminamos 14 unidades de vegetación. Luego de hacer un control a campo, elaboramos el mapa final, agrupando las unidades de vegetación en siete clases.  Resultados: En el mapa final identificamos: bosques nativos, bosques exóticos, matorrales nativos, pajonales, céspedes, pastizales con roca y/o suelo desnudo y roquedales. Estas clases se discriminaron con una precisión general del 82,6%. Además, separamos cuerpos de agua, zonas inundables, cultivos y zonas urbanas. Los matorrales, que fueron la clase más extendida, abarcaron un 37% del paisaje, le siguieron los cultivos, que cubrieron un 23% del territorio. Los bosques nativos sólo ocuparon un 5,5% del área. Matorrales y bosques disminuyeron a lo largo del gradiente altitudinal, mientras que pastizales y roquedales aumentaron.  Conclusiones: Sugerimos que un ordenamiento territorial de las montañas debería promover la restauración de los bosques nativos hasta ocupar un 20-40% del paisaje, el control del avance de las zonas urbanas y cultivos, y el manejo de especies exóticas invasoras para limitar su expansión sobre las fisonomías nativas.

Novedades Para La Flora De La Argentina

Novelties for the Flora of Argentina. On the occasion of preparing the Flora of Cordoba, new records for the Argentinean flora have been registered as a result of intensive field trips and the revision of the main herbaria collections of the country. In this paper, three new records for the native flora and 17 for the introduced flora (casual aliens and naturalized species) of Argentina are presented. Descriptions, illustrations and a lectotypification are done. Furthermore, the presence of 10 introduced species is formally documented for the first time.Novelties for the Flora of Argentina. On the occasion of preparing the Flora of Cordoba, new records for the Argentinean flora have been registered as a result of intensive field trips and the revision of the main herbaria collections of the country. In this paper, three new records for the native flora and 17 for the introduced flora (casual aliens and naturalized species) of Argentina are presented. Descriptions, illustrations and a lectotypification are done. Furthermore, the presence of 10 introduced species is formally documented for the first time

sPlotOpen – An environmentally balanced, open-access, global dataset of vegetation plots

Assessing biodiversity status and trends in plant communities is critical for understanding, quantifying and predicting the effects of global change on ecosystems. Vegetation plots record the occurrence or abundance of all plant species co-occurring within delimited local areas. This allows species absences to be inferred, information seldom provided by existing global plant datasets. Although many vegetation plots have been recorded, most are not available to the global research community. A recent initiative, called ?sPlot?, compiled the first global vegetation plot database, and continues to grow and curate it. The sPlot database, however, is extremely unbalanced spatially and environmentally, and is not open-access. Here, we address both these issues by (a) resampling the vegetation plots using several environmental variables as sampling strata and (b) securing permission from data holders of 105 local-to-regional datasets to openly release data. We thus present sPlotOpen, the largest open-access dataset of vegetation plots ever released. sPlotOpen can be used to explore global diversity at the plant community level, as ground truth data in remote sensing applications, or as a baseline for biodiversity monitoring. Main types of variable contained: Vegetation plots (n = 95,104) recording cover or abundance of naturally co-occurring vascular plant species within delimited areas. sPlotOpen contains three partially overlapping resampled datasets (c. 50,000 plots each), to be used as replicates in global analyses. Besides geographical location, date, plot size, biome, elevation, slope, aspect, vegetation type, naturalness, coverage of various vegetation layers, and source dataset, plot-level data also include community-weighted means and variances of 18 plant functional traits from the TRY Plant Trait Database. Spatial location and grain: Global, 0.01?40,000 m². Time period and grain: 1888-2015, recording dates. Major taxa and level of measurement: 42,677 vascular plant taxa, plot-level records.Fil: Sabatini, Francesco Maria. Martin-universität Halle-wittenberg; Alemania. German Centre For Integrative Biodiversity Research (idiv) Halle-jena-leipzig; AlemaniaFil: Lenoir, Jonathan. Université de Picardie Jules Verne; FranciaFil: Hattab, Tarek. Université de Montpellier; FranciaFil: Arnst, Elise Aimee. Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research; Nueva ZelandaFil: Chytrý, Milan. Masaryk University; República ChecaFil: Giorgis, Melisa Adriana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal; ArgentinaFil: Vanselow, Kim André. University of Erlangen-Nuremberg; AlemaniaFil: Vásquez Martínez, Rodolfo. Jardín Botánico de Missouri Oxapampa; PerúFil: Vassilev, Kiril. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; BulgariaFil: Vélez-Martin, Eduardo. ILEX Consultoria Científica; BrasilFil: Venanzoni, Roberto. University of Perugia; ItaliaFil: Vibrans, Alexander Christian. Universidade Regional de Blumenau; BrasilFil: Violle, Cyrille. Paul Valéry Montpellier University; FranciaFil: Virtanen, Risto. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; AlemaniaFil: von Wehrden, Henrik. Leuphana University of Lüneburg; AlemaniaFil: Wagner, Viktoria. University of Alberta; CanadáFil: Walker, Donald A.. University of Alaska; Estados UnidosFil: Waller, Donald M.. University of Wisconsin-Madison; Estados UnidosFil: Wang, Hua-Feng. Hainan University; ChinaFil: Wesche, Karsten. Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz; Alemania. Technische Universität Dresden; AlemaniaFil: Whitfeld, Timothy J. S.. University of Minnesota; Estados UnidosFil: Willner, Wolfgang. University of Vienna; AustriaFil: Wiser, Susan K.. Manaaki Whenua. Landcare Research; Nueva ZelandaFil: Wohlgemuth, Thomas. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research; SuizaFil: Yamalov, Sergey. Russian Academy of Sciences; RusiaFil: Zobel, Martin. University of Tartu; EstoniaFil: Bruelheide, Helge. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; Alemani

What do you mean, ‘megafire’?

BACKGROUND : ‘Megafire’ is an emerging concept commonly used to describe fires that are extreme in terms of size, behaviour, and/or impacts, but the term’s meaning remains ambiguous. APPROACH : We sought to resolve ambiguity surrounding the meaning of ‘megafire’ by conducting a structured review of the use and definition of the term in several languages in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. We collated definitions and descriptions of megafire and identified criteria frequently invoked to define megafire. We recorded the size and location of megafires and mapped them to reveal global variation in the size of fires described as megafires. RESULTS : We identified 109 studies that define the term ‘megafire’ or identify a megafire, with the term first appearing in the peer-reviewed literature in 2005. Seventy-one (~65%) of these studies attempted to describe or define the term. There was considerable variability in the criteria used to define megafire, although definitions of megafire based on fire size were most common. Megafire size thresholds varied geographically from > 100–100,000 ha, with fires > 10,000 ha the most common size threshold (41%, 18/44 studies). Definitions of megafire were most common from studies led by authors from North America (52%, 37/71). We recorded 137 instances from 84 studies where fires were reported as megafires, the vast majority (94%, 129/137) of which exceed 10,000 ha in size. Megafires occurred in a range of biomes, but were most frequently described in forested biomes (112/137, 82%), and usually described single ignition fires (59% 81/137). CONCLUSION : As Earth’s climate and ecosystems change, it is important that scientists can communicate trends in the occurrence of larger and more extreme fires with clarity. To overcome ambiguity, we suggest a definition of megafire as fires > 10,000 ha arising from single or multiple related ignition events. We introduce two additional terms – gigafire (> 100,000 ha) and terafire (> 1,000,000 ha) – for fires of an even larger scale than megafires.DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: A list of the references from which the data were extracted can be found in the Appendix A: Data sources. The data used in this study are openly available at zenodo.org: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6252145.Threatened Species Recovery Hub; NSW Bushfire Risk Management Research Hub; Australian Wildlife Society; World Wildlife Fund.http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/gebZoology and Entomolog

Incendios en la Provincia de Córdoba: La urgencia de un abordaje integral

En el año 2020 los incendios en Córdoba alcanzaron magnitudes extremas, reavivando la discusión sobre sus causas, su impacto en los ecosistemas y las políticas públicas en torno a su manejo en el paisaje. Si bien los ecosistemas de Córdoba están adaptados a regímenes naturales históricos de fuego, la creciente presión humana los ha modificado drásticamente, generando a menudo un impacto ecológico y social negativo. Las causas y las consecuencias de los incendios sobre los ecosistemas son complejas y muy variables; por lo tanto, son necesarias decisiones planeadas y coherentes para lograr eficiencia en las políticas públicas. Éstas requieren un abordaje integral y sostenido del manejo del fuego de manera urgente