Incorporating a rule-based model of judgment into a wastewater treatment plant design optimization model

The use of a rule-based modeling technique for the formal consideration of poorly modeled issues in a water quality management problem is illustrated in the context of wastewater treatment plant design. Sludge bulking is a poorly understood problem in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants. An engineer must use judgement gained from experience when he designs an activated sludge plant to prevent bulking from causing the plant to fail. An attempt was made to use fuzzy logic in order to model that judgement. Results from research were taken from the literature and used independently as constraints to an activated sludge wastewater plant design optimization model to see their effect on the optimal design. Some of the research results were then formulated as rules in a rule-based system which relates design variable values to the likelihood of a design experiencing bulking problems. The weights of association of those rules to the conclusion that a given design would experience bulking problems and the logical interaction of those rules were calibrated using an experienced engineer's evaluation of a set of 15 plant designs. The consistency of the engineer's and the judgement model's evaluations were then checked with a second set of 15 designs. The model of judgement could be used to evaluate the bulking potential of any design. In the particular example developed, the judgement model was incorporated into a wastewater treatment plant design optimization model so that the cost effectiveness of constraint combinations could be examined. The tradeoff between cost and the likelihood of experiencing bulking problems was examined for a typical plant design problem.U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological SurveyOpe

Workstation environment for wastewater treatment design using AI and mathematical models

This research explores the use of computer-based environments to facilitate environmental engineering decision making. A prototype system is developed for wastewater treatment plant design as an exploration tool to demonstrate the techniques and principles proposed. Several mathematical techniques, interactive graphic displays, and friendly user interfaces are used. The mathematical techniques are: (1) mass and water balances for an analysis program for wastewater treatment plant design, (2) a rule-based system for sludge bulking judgment, and (3) a standard processor for checking a design against existing design standards. The interactive graphic displays provide visual data for effective data manipulation, and the friendly user interfaces are designed for engineers who are not necessarily computer experts.U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological SurveyOpe

Restoring shellfish reefs: Global guidelines for practitioners and scientists

Widespread global declines in shellfish reefs (ecosystem-forming bivalves such as oysters and mussels) have led to growing interest in their restoration and protection. With restoration projects now occurring on four continents and in at least seven countries, global restoration guidelines for these ecosystems have been developed based on experience over the past two decades. The following key elements of the guidelines are outlined: (a) the case for shellfish reef resto- ration and securing financial resources; (b) planning, feasibility, and goal set- ting; (c) biosecurity and permitting; (d) restoration in practice; (e) scaling up from pilot to larger scale restoration, (f) monitoring, (g) restoration beyond oyster reefs (specifically mussels), and (h) successful communication for shell- fish reef restoration projects

Between Education and Propaganda: Public Controversy Over Presidential Library Design

While there is abundant scholarship on extant presidential libraries, rejected presidential library proposals are comparatively understudied. Here, we analyze the public controversies surrounding Richard Nixon's and Ronald Reagan's ill-fated plans for housing their presidential libraries at Duke and Stanford Universities, respectively. These parallel cases offer a glimpse into what Thomas Farrell terms “social knowledge in controversy” — episodes where prevailing social precedents governing human decision-making evolve in the crucible of public argument. What are the presumptions about how presidential libraries should be built and operated? How did they shape the public argument at Duke and Stanford during the early 1980s, and in turn, how did those schools' ultimate decisions to reject the Nixon and Reagan Library proposals reinforce or mold the presumptions? Through examination of primary documents housed at the Stanford and Duke University archives, we generate insight regarding the evolving political function of presidential libraries, and explore the utility of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's theory of argumentation as a tool of rhetorical criticism. Such inquiry is especially timely in the contemporary milieu, where public controversy simmers regarding the 43rd American president's future library at Southern Methodist University, and where issues of government transparency and accountability persist as salient topics of public and scholarly concern