59 research outputs found
Total hip replacement: increasing femoral offset improves functional outcome
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the independent effect of radiographic measures of implant position, relative to pre-operative anatomical assessment, on the functional outcome of total hip arthroplasty according to change in the Oxford hip score (OHS) 1 year post surgery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was preformed to assess whether improvement in functional outcome (change in OHS at 1 year) and the relationship with femoral offset and length, and acetabular offset and height. After a power calculation 359 patients were recruited to the study and radiographic measures were performed by blinded observers. Regression analysis was used to assess the independent effect of the four radiographic measurements after adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: There was a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in acetabular offset [5.3 mm, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.4–6.2] and increase in femoral offset (6.1 mm, 95 % CI 5.4–6.8). Hence there was no significant change in overall offset. Femoral offset was the only radiographic measure to be achieved statistical significance (r = 0.198, 95 % CI 0.063–0.333, p = 0.004) in relation to clinical outcome, with increasing offset being associated with a greater improvement in the OHS. On combining femoral and acetabular offset increasing offset was associated with a greater improvement in the OHS (r = 0.10, 95 % CI 0.01–0.19, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study supports the long-held biomechanical theory of medialisation of the acetabular component with compensatory increased femoral offset results in improved functional outcome
Dose intraarticular steroid injection increase the rate of infection in subsequent arthroplasty: grading the evidence through a meta-analysis
The impact of the implementation of physician assistants in inpatient care: A multicenter matched-controlled study
Contains fulltext :
177273.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Medical care for admitted patients in hospitals is increasingly reallocated to physician assistants (PAs). There is limited evidence about the consequences for the quality and safety of care. This study aimed to determine the effects of substitution of inpatient care from medical doctors (MDs) to PAs on patients' length of stay (LOS), quality and safety of care, and patient experiences with the provided care. METHODS: In a multicenter matched-controlled study, the traditional model in which only MDs are employed for inpatient care (MD model) was compared with a mixed model in which besides MDs also PAs are employed (PA/MD model). Thirty-four wards were recruited across the Netherlands. Patients were followed from admission till one month after discharge. Primary outcome measure was patients' LOS. Secondary outcomes concerned eleven indicators for quality and safety of inpatient care and patients' experiences with the provided care. RESULTS: Data on 2,307 patients from 34 hospital wards was available. The involvement of PAs was not significantly associated with LOS (beta 1.20, 95%CI 0.99-1.40, p = .062). None of the indicators for quality and safety of care were different between study arms. However, the involvement of PAs was associated with better experiences of patients (beta 0.49, 95% CI 0.22-0.76, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not find differences regarding LOS and quality of care between wards on which PAs, in collaboration with MDs, provided medical care for the admitted patients, and wards on which only MDs provided medical care. Employing PAs seems to be safe and seems to lead to better patient experiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01835444
Neuromuscular blocking agents to facilitate tracheal intubation. Comparing outcomes from multiple interventions using network meta-analysis
status: publishe
Estimating Scaphoid Lengths Using Anatomical Measurements in the Wrist
In reconstructive surgery of scaphoid nonunions with humpback deformity, some surgeons recommend restoration of the normal scaphoid length whereas others overexpand the normal length to ensure carpal realignment and prevent late collapse. To be able to define overexpansion and investigate which levels of overexpansion yield optimal clinical results, a precise method for estimating the original scaphoid length is required. The purpose of this anatomic study was to investigate the precision of estimating normal scaphoid lengths based on intact adjacent bone dimensions, compared with using the contralateral scaphoid length. From bilateral computed tomographic scans of 28 healthy wrist pairs, 3-dimensional virtual bone models were created. The left and right scaphoid lengths were determined at the central axis. The capitate length at the central axis and the distal radius width served to derive an ipsilateral scaphoid length estimate. Estimation precision for individual cases was based on the 95% range (±1.96 × SD) of the observed differences between the actual and estimated lengths. On average, the capitate length was 10% smaller than the scaphoid length; the radius width was 9% larger. Consequently, we averaged the capitate length and radius width for ipsilateral estimations. The average difference between the scaphoid length and the latter ipsilateral estimate was 0.1 mm. The average contralateral scaphoid length difference was also 0.1 mm. Estimation precisions, however, were ±2.2 and ±1.4 mm, respectively. Scaphoid length estimation based on the contralateral scaphoid is more precise than the estimating scaphoid length using the ipsilateral radius and capitate. Scaphoid overexpansion can be ensured if the restored length is at least 1.4 mm longer than the contralateral length. This may be valuable information when establishing a target length for reconstruction and investigating the consequences of scaphoid overexpansion on clinical function, such as range of motion, which are currently unknow
Scaphoid screw fixation perpendicular to the fracture plane: Comparing volar and dorsal approaches
textabstractIntroduction: To percutaneously fixate a midwaist scaphoid fracture, both volar and dorsal approaches are considered valid options although they may have different screw insertion angles relative to the scaphoid fracture plane influencing fixation stability. In this virtual simulation study, we investigated the accessibility of placing a screw perpendicularly to the fracture plane in transverse and horizontal oblique scaphoid midwaist fracture models and compared standard volar and dorsal approaches. Material and methods: Computed tomography scans of 38 healthy wrists were used to obtain virtual 3-dimensional wrist models in flexion and extension. In case the trapezium in volar approach or the distal radius in dorsal approach obstructed the screw axis perpendicular to the fracture plane, an alternative non-obstructed screw axis was chosen as close as possible to the perpendicular axis. The deviation angle between the best possible non-obstructed screw placement and true perpendicular screw placement was quantified. Results: For transverse fractures, the average deviation angle (±. standard deviation) was 8° (±. 5°) in volar approach, and 0° (±. 0°) in dorsal approach. For horizontal oblique fractures, these angles were 40° (±. 6°) and 14° (±. 8°), respectively. Discussion: In our simulations, compared to the volar approach, the dorsal approach provided the most precise screw placement perpendicular to the fracture plane, with the largest differences for horizontal oblique fractures. When taken in addition to screw purchase, thread engagement and protrusion risk, information about screw orientation may help surgeons in deciding between percutaneous approaches in scaphoid surgery on which there is currently no consensus. Level of evidence: N/A
Scaphoid screw fixation perpendicular to the fracture plane: Comparing volar and dorsal approaches
To percutaneously fixate a midwaist scaphoid fracture, both volar and dorsal approaches are considered valid options although they may have different screw insertion angles relative to the scaphoid fracture plane influencing fixation stability. In this virtual simulation study, we investigated the accessibility of placing a screw perpendicularly to the fracture plane in transverse and horizontal oblique scaphoid midwaist fracture models and compared standard volar and dorsal approaches. Computed tomography scans of 38 healthy wrists were used to obtain virtual 3-dimensional wrist models in flexion and extension. In case the trapezium in volar approach or the distal radius in dorsal approach obstructed the screw axis perpendicular to the fracture plane, an alternative non-obstructed screw axis was chosen as close as possible to the perpendicular axis. The deviation angle between the best possible non-obstructed screw placement and true perpendicular screw placement was quantified. For transverse fractures, the average deviation angle (±standard deviation) was 8° (±5°) in volar approach, and 0° (±0°) in dorsal approach. For horizontal oblique fractures, these angles were 40° (±6°) and 14° (±8°), respectively. In our simulations, compared to the volar approach, the dorsal approach provided the most precise screw placement perpendicular to the fracture plane, with the largest differences for horizontal oblique fractures. When taken in addition to screw purchase, thread engagement and protrusion risk, information about screw orientation may help surgeons in deciding between percutaneous approaches in scaphoid surgery on which there is currently no consensus. N/
- …