Expression analysis of mitotic spindle checkpoint genes in breast carcinoma: role of NDC80/HEC1 in early breast tumorigenicity, and a two-gene signature for aneuploidy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Aneuploidy and chromosomal instability (CIN) are common abnormalities in human cancer. Alterations of the mitotic spindle checkpoint are likely to contribute to these phenotypes, but little is known about somatic alterations of mitotic spindle checkpoint genes in breast cancer.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To obtain further insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying aneuploidy in breast cancer, we used real-time quantitative RT-PCR to quantify the mRNA expression of 76 selected mitotic spindle checkpoint genes in a large panel of breast tumor samples.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The expression of 49 (64.5%) of the 76 genes was significantly dysregulated in breast tumors compared to normal breast tissues: 40 genes were upregulated and 9 were downregulated. Most of these changes in gene expression during malignant transformation were observed in epithelial cells.</p> <p>Alterations of nine of these genes, and particularly <it>NDC80</it>, were also detected in benign breast tumors, indicating that they may be involved in pre-neoplastic processes.</p> <p>We also identified a two-gene expression signature (<it>PLK1 </it>+ <it>AURKA</it>) which discriminated between DNA aneuploid and DNA diploid breast tumor samples. Interestingly, some DNA tetraploid tumor samples failed to cluster with DNA aneuploid breast tumors.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study confirms the importance of previously characterized genes and identifies novel candidate genes that could be activated for aneuploidy to occur. Further functional analyses are required to clearly confirm the role of these new identified genes in the molecular mechanisms involved in breast cancer aneuploidy. The novel genes identified here, and/or the two-gene expression signature, might serve as diagnostic or prognostic markers and form the basis for novel therapeutic strategies.</p

NF-kappa B genes have a major role in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>IBC (Inflammatory Breast cancer) is a rare form of breast cancer with a particular phenotype. New molecular targets are needed to improve the treatment of this rapidly fatal disease. Given the role of NF-κB-related genes in cell proliferation, invasiveness, angiogenesis and inflammation, we postulated that they might be deregulated in IBC.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We measured the mRNA expression levels of 60 NF-κB-related genes by using real-time quantitative RT-PCR in a well-defined series of 35 IBCs, by comparison with 22 stage IIB and III non inflammatory breast cancers. Twenty-four distant metastases of breast cancer served as "poor prognosis" breast tumor controls.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Thirty-five (58%) of the 60 NF-κB-related genes were significantly upregulated in IBC compared with non IBC. The upregulated genes were NF-κB genes (<it>NFKB1</it>, <it>RELA</it>, <it>IKBKG</it>, <it>NFKBIB</it>, <it>NFKB2</it>, <it>REL</it>, <it>CHUK</it>), apoptosis genes (<it>MCL1L</it>, <it>TNFAIP3/A20</it>, <it>GADD45B</it>, <it>FASLG</it>, <it>MCL1S</it>, <it>IER3L</it>, <it>TNFRSF10B/TRAILR2</it>), immune response genes (<it>CD40</it>, <it>CD48</it>, <it>TNFSF11/RANKL</it>, <it>TNFRSF11A/RANK</it>, <it>CCL2/MCP-1</it>, <it>CD40LG</it>, <it>IL15</it>, <it>GBP1</it>), proliferation genes (<it>CCND2</it>, <it>CCND3</it>, <it>CSF1R</it>, <it>CSF1</it>, <it>SOD2</it>), tumor-promoting genes (<it>CXCL12</it>, <it>SELE</it>, <it>TNC</it>, <it>VCAM1</it>, <it>ICAM1</it>, <it>PLAU/UPA</it>) or angiogenesis genes (<it>PTGS2/COX2</it>, <it>CXCL1/GRO1</it>). Only two of these 35 genes (<it>PTGS2/COX2 </it>and <it>CXCL1/GRO1</it>)were also upregulated in breast cancer metastases. We identified a five-gene molecular signature that matched patient outcomes, consisting of <it>IL8 </it>and <it>VEGF </it>plus three NF-κB-unrelated genes that we had previously identified as prognostic markers in the same series of IBC.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The NF-κB pathway appears to play a major role in IBC, possibly contributing to the unusual phenotype and aggressiveness of this form of breast cancer. Some upregulated NF-κB-related genes might serve as novel therapeutic targets in IBC.</p

Update on inflammatory breast cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is both the least frequent and the most severe form of epithelial breast cancer. The diagnosis is based on clinical inflammatory signs and is reinforced by pathological findings. Significant progress has been made in the management of IBC in the past 20 years. Yet survival among IBC patients is still only one-half that among patients with non-IBC. Identification of the molecular determinants of IBC would probably lead to more specific treatments and to improved survival. In the present article we review recent advances in the molecular pathogenesis of IBC. A more comprehensive view will probably be obtained by pan-genomic analysis of human IBC samples, and by functional in vitro and in vivo assays. These approaches may offer better patient outcome in the near future

Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Management: State of the Art

Endocrine therapy is the mainstay of treatment in HR+/HER2- breast cancers, which represent about 70% of all breast cancers. Neoadjuvant therapy has been developed since the 1990s to address several issues, including breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and improvement of survival rates. For a long time, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) was confined to frail patients in order to improve surgery outcome. Since the 2000s, NET now plays a central role as a research tool for predictive endocrine sensitivity biomarkers and targeted therapies. One of the major issues in early HR+/HER2- breast cancer is to identify patients in whom chemotherapy can be safely withheld. In vivo assessment of response to NET might be the best treatment strategy to address this issue

Bouffées de chaleur et cancer du sein avec récepteurs hormonaux positifs : mécanismes et prise en charge

International audienceBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women and the first cause of cancer death in France. Among the different subtypes of breast cancer, the predominant form is characterized by positive hormone receptors (more than 70% of breast cancers). Hormone therapy thus plays a key role in the strategy of management of these cancers both in adjuvant and metastatic situations. The two types of adjuvant hormone therapy used are selective estrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors. Fulvestrant, an anti-estrogen, is used alone or in combination with other molecules in metastatic situations. Hot flashes are one of the symptoms most frequently reported by patients under hormone therapy. Hormone replacement therapy, which is currently the most effective treatment for hot flashes, is contraindicated in patients with a personal history of breast cancer. Various therapeutic classes of drugs have been tested in this indication but without real efficacy in the various studies carried out to date, and moreover associated with non-negligible side effects. The recent discovery of the implication of the kisspeptin system located at the hypothalamic level in the mechanism of genesis of hot flashes opens the way to possible new symptomatic treatments for hot flashes. Neurokinin 3 receptor antagonists have shown encouraging preliminary results in postmenopausal cancer-free patients and could be considered in patients in hormonal therapy for breast cancer. Broader additional studies are needed to confirm these initial results

Hétérogénéité tumorale des cancers du sein

International audienceThe objective of this literature review is to describe the types of tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer and their clinical implication. Two kinds of tumor heterogeneity are described: intertumor heterogeneity and intra-tumor heterogeneity. In breast cancer, inter-tumor heterogeneity was best characterized in the 2000s thanks to high throughput analyses. These analyzes resulted in a molecular classification of breast cancers distinguishing four subtypes: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER 2+ and basal like. This variability may be observed between the primary tumor and metastases, namely the temporal intratumor heterogeneity. The average discrepancy for the progesterone receptor, estrogen, and between HER2 status appears to be 33%, 20% and 8%, respectively. It is then interesting to study the heterogeneity within the primary tumor: this spatial intra-tumor heterogeneity is poorly known. Physiopathology of intra-tumor heterogeneity light be deciphered by studies on cancer stem cells and clonal evolution model. In addition, the tumor microenvironment seems to actively contribute to this heterogeneity. The major interest to study this heterogeneity is the clinical implication that could result. While precision medicine is emerging, it is important to capture the heterogeneity of each specific tumor type. These new biological knowledge will allow us to anticipate such heterogeneity and individualize the management of breast cancer. Copyrigh