Providers’ Perspectives on Addressing Health Risk Behaviors and Mental Health among Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cance

Objectives: We examined healthcare providers’ perspectives on how childhood cancer impacts young adult health behaviors and psychosocial functioning, how healthy lifestyle and psychosocial issues are addressed in this population, challenges related to addressing these issues, and potential resources for addressing them.Methods: In 2012, we recruited 21 healthcare providers (e.g., oncologists, nurses, social workers) who treat young adult survivors of childhood cancer from a children’s hospital and a cancer center in the Southeastern U.S. to complete telephone-based semi-structured interviews.Results: Our sample was an average of 45.95 (SD=7.57) years old, 52.4% female, and 81.0% MDs. Most mentioned that the impact of cancer on health risk behaviors and psychosocial functioning depended on several things including social support and other environmental factors. Participants indicated several general activities and approaches aimed at addressing healthy lifestyles among this population. Participants reported a range of health education, from minimal education to continuous education throughout treatment and survivorship. Providers indicated a team-oriented approach to addressing psychosocial issues and that the survivorship program addressed the complications of obtaining insurance, education and employment, and reproductive health within this population. A major factor was the involvement of the family in addressing these issues. Providers’ challenges in intervening included limited time, resources, financial support, and referral options. Participants suggested resources to address these challenges.Conclusions: Several resources are needed to address the challenges faced by practitioners in addressing young adult survivors’ issues, including physical resources, social support resources, education for patients and healthcare providers, and programs to provide financial support

The threat of the COVID-19 pandemic on reversing global life-saving gains in the survival of childhood cancer: A call for collaborative action from SIOP, IPSO, PROS, WCC, CCI, st jude global, UICC and WHPCA

The COVID-19 pandemic poses an unprecedented health crisis in all socio-economic regions across the globe. While the pandemic has had a profound impact on access to and delivery of health care by all services, it has been particularly disruptive for the care of patients with life-threatening noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) such as the treatment of children and young people with cancer. The reduction in child mortality from preventable causes over the last 50 years has seen childhood cancer emerge as a major unmet health care need. Whilst survival rates of 85% have been achieved in high income countries, this has not yet been translated into similar outcomes for children with cancer in resource-limited settings where survival averages 30%. Launched in 2018, by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC) is a pivotal effort by the international community to achieve at least 60% survival for children with cancer by 2030. The WHO GICC is already making an impact in many countries but the disruption of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic threatens to set back this global effort to improve the outcome for children with cancer, wherever they may live. As representatives of the global community committed to fostering the goals of the GICC, we applaud the WHO response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular we support the WHO's call to ensure the needs of patients with life threatening NCDs including cancer are not compromised during the pandemic. Here, as collaborative partners in the GICC, we highlight specific areas of focus that need to be addressed to ensure the immediate care of children and adolescents with cancer is not disrupted during the pandemic; and measures to sustain the development of cancer care so the long-term goals of the GICC are not lost during this global health crisis.Fil: Pritchard Jones, Kathy. University College London; Estados UnidosFil: de Abib, Simone C.V.. International Society Of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; Surinam. Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Esiashvili, Natia. University of Emory; Estados UnidosFil: Kaspers, Gertjan J.L.. Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology; Países BajosFil: Rosser, Jon. No especifíca;Fil: van Doorninck, John A.. Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children; Estados UnidosFil: Braganca, João M.L.. No especifíca;Fil: Hoffman, Ruth I.. No especifíca;Fil: Rodriguez Galindo, Carlos. St Jude Children’s Research Hospital; Estados UnidosFil: Adams, Cary. Union for International Cancer Control; SuizaFil: Connor, Stephen R.. Worldwide Hospice Palliative Care Alliance; Estados UnidosFil: Abdelhafeez, Abdelhafeez H.. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; Suiza. St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital; Estados UnidosFil: Bouffet, Eric. University Of Toronto. Hospital For Sick Children; Canadá. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; SuizaFil: Howard, Scott C.. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; Suiza. University of Tennessee; Estados UnidosFil: Challinor, Julia M.. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; Suiza. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Hessissen, Laila. Children Hospital of Rabat; Marruecos. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; SuizaFil: Dalvi, Rashmi B.. Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences; India. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; SuizaFil: Kearns, Pamela. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; SuizaFil: Chantada, Guillermo Luis. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Frazier, Lindsay A.. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; Suiza. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Sullivan, Michael J.. University of Melbourne; Australia. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; SuizaFil: Schulte, Fiona S.M.. University of Calgary; Canadá. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; SuizaFil: Morrissey, Lisa K.. Boston Children’s Hospital; Estados Unidos. International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology; SuizaFil: Kozhaeva, Olga. European Society for Paediatric Oncology; BélgicaFil: Luna Fineman, Sandra. Children’s Hospital Colorado; Estados Unidos. International Society of Paediatric Oncology; SuizaFil: Khan, Muhammad S.. Tawam Hospital; Emiratos Arabes Unido

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on delivery of pediatric radiotherapy: A critical review

The COVID-19 pandemic has prevented the timely diagnosis and treatment of many diseases, including pediatric cancer. Its impact on pediatric oncologic treatments warrants investigation. As radiotherapy is an integral component of cancer care, we reviewed the published data regarding the impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of pediatric radiotherapy to inform actions for future global events. We found that disruptions in radiotherapy were reported amongst interruptions in other therapies. Disruptions were more common in low-income countries (78%) and low middle-income countries (68%) compared with upper middle-income countries (46%) and high-income countries (10%). Several papers included recommendations for mitigation strategies. Altered treatment regimens were common, including increasing the use of active surveillance and systemic therapy to delay local therapies, and accelerated/hypofractionated dose delivery. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 has impacted radiotherapy delivery in the pediatric population globally. Countries with limited resources may be more affected. Various mitigation strategies have been developed. The efficacy of mitigation measures warrants further investigatio

Whole lung irradiation in stage IV Wilms tumor patients: Thyroid dosimetry and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the thyroid dosimetry and long-term follow-up of childhood cancer survivors treated with whole lung irradiation (WLI) for Wilms tumor. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with pulmonary metastases from Wilms tumor who underwent WLI from 2000 TO 2012 at a single institution were reviewed. Radiation dose to the thyroid gland in each case was calculated. Postradiation thyroid function test (TFT) results and management of thyroid function abnormalities were extracted from the medical records. RESULTS: Median age at treatment was 5 years (range: 1-9 years), and median follow-up time was 74.1 months (7.2-198.4). The male/female ratio was 1:1.8. Complete dosimetry data were available for 22 of the 28 patients receiving WLI. Mean thyroid volume was 3.3 cc (range: 1-6.8). The average mean and median mean dose to the thyroid was 6.7 and 7.1 Gy, respectively (range: 1.3-11.7 Gy). Average max dose to the thyroid was 12.4 Gy (range: 7.8-20.3 Gy). Two patients were found to have a thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) above the normal range, managed with levothyroxine. Another patient was found to have an isolated elevation of TSH which normalized without treatment. A fourth patient was found to have an enlarged thyroid on examination with no palpable nodules or abnormal TFTs. CONCLUSIONS: Average mean dose to the thyroid gland was 6.7 Gy for this population of stage IV Wilms tumor patients. There was a low rate of thyroid dysfunction, but limited follow-up. Attention to blocking the thyroid gland as much as possible when designing radiation fields can potentially mitigate the risks of long-term thyroid effects

Validation of cutaneous lymphoma international prognostic index (CLIPI) for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

We sought to evaluate the performance of the cutaneous lymphoma international prognostic index (CLIPI), a prognostic index for mycosis fungoides (MF), and Sézary syndrome (SS), in our cohort of patients seen at Emory University between 1998 and 2013. Additionally, we examined the prognostic significance of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), B0a/b, and CD30 status. A total of 390 patients were included in analysis: 78.2% early stage (IA-IIA), 7.2% with SS, 53.1% male, mean age 53.5 years. CLIPI stratified patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for early stage patients (p \u3c 0.0001), but was not significant for late stage patients. On multivariable analysis for early stage patients, age \u3e60, plaques, folliculotropic disease was significant for OS and age \u3e60, plaques, N1/Nx was significant for PFS. In the overall cohort, CD30+, elevated LDH, and B0b were significant for worse OS and PFS

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Case for Dose Escalation and Organ at Risk Toxicity Reduction

Purpose: Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma remains challenging because of proximity to surrounding organs at risk (OAR). We report the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas to minimize dose to OAR while concurrently optimizing tumor dose coverage