17 research outputs found

    Comparison of the horizontal gaze distribution (HGD) towards the central 20° area of the visual field between patients who passed (Pf) and patients who failed (Pf); glaucoma patients who passed (GPp) and glaucoma patients who failed (GPf); and between patients with right-sided HVFDs who passed (HRp), with left-sided HVFDs who passed (HLp), and patients with HVFDs who failed (HPf).

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of the horizontal gaze distribution (HGD) towards the central 20° area of the visual field between patients who passed (Pf) and patients who failed (Pf); glaucoma patients who passed (GPp) and glaucoma patients who failed (GPf); and between patients with right-sided HVFDs who passed (HRp), with left-sided HVFDs who passed (HLp), and patients with HVFDs who failed (HPf).</p

    Driving parameters with significant differences between glaucoma control subjects who passed (GCp), glaucoma patients who passed (GPp) and glaucoma patients who failed (GPf) the driving assessment.

    No full text
    <p>Driving parameters with significant differences between glaucoma control subjects who passed (GCp), glaucoma patients who passed (GPp) and glaucoma patients who failed (GPf) the driving assessment.</p

    The proportion of glances in percent (PGP) of patients with homonymous visual field defects towards the VFD during the on-road assessment.

    No full text
    <p>For each of the eight road scenes (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0087470#pone-0087470-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>), the upper panel shows the PGP of each participant. The lower panel shows the corresponding VFD tested by binocular semi-automated 90° kinetic perimetry. The red line and the shallow red area represent the border and the extent of the HVFD, respectively.</p

    Left: Comparison of the proportion of glances in percent (PGP) towards the VFD between patients who passed (Pf) and patients who failed (Pf); Middle: Comparison of PGP towards VFD between glaucoma patients who passed (GPp) and glaucoma patients who failed (GPf); Right: Comparison of PGP towards VFD between patients with right-sided HVFDs who passed (HRp), patients with left-sided HVFDs who passed (HLp), and patients with HVFDs who failed (HPf).

    No full text
    <p>Left: Comparison of the proportion of glances in percent (PGP) towards the VFD between patients who passed (Pf) and patients who failed (Pf); Middle: Comparison of PGP towards VFD between glaucoma patients who passed (GPp) and glaucoma patients who failed (GPf); Right: Comparison of PGP towards VFD between patients with right-sided HVFDs who passed (HRp), patients with left-sided HVFDs who passed (HLp), and patients with HVFDs who failed (HPf).</p

    Performance and gaze-related parameters for glaucoma control subjects who passed (GCp), glaucoma patients who passed (GPp), and glaucoma patients who failed the task (GPf).

    No full text
    <p>Statistical comparisons were made between the groups.</p><p>*p<0.05; ***p<0.001, n.s: indicates non-significant comparisons.</p><p>Performance and gaze-related parameters for glaucoma control subjects who passed (GCp), glaucoma patients who passed (GPp), and glaucoma patients who failed the task (GPf).</p

    The drug store corridor with all marked special-offer products (orange signs) on two racks (each containing six shelves).

    No full text
    <p>Two cameras (marked by blue circles) at the beginning and the end of the corridor were used to record navigation of the subjects during the task.</p
    corecore