New Bounds for Facial Nonrepetitive Colouring

We prove that the facial nonrepetitive chromatic number of any outerplanar graph is at most 11 and of any planar graph is at most 22.Comment: 16 pages, 5 figure

Nonrepetitive Colourings of Planar Graphs with O(log⁡n)O(\log n) Colours

A vertex colouring of a graph is \emph{nonrepetitive} if there is no path for which the first half of the path is assigned the same sequence of colours as the second half. The \emph{nonrepetitive chromatic number} of a graph $G$ is the minimum integer $k$ such that $G$ has a nonrepetitive $k$-colouring. Whether planar graphs have bounded nonrepetitive chromatic number is one of the most important open problems in the field. Despite this, the best known upper bound is $O(\sqrt{n})$ for $n$-vertex planar graphs. We prove a $O(\log n)$ upper bound

Layout of Graphs with Bounded Tree-Width

A \emph{queue layout} of a graph consists of a total order of the vertices, and a partition of the edges into \emph{queues}, such that no two edges in the same queue are nested. The minimum number of queues in a queue layout of a graph is its \emph{queue-number}. A \emph{three-dimensional (straight-line grid) drawing} of a graph represents the vertices by points in $\mathbb{Z}^3$ and the edges by non-crossing line-segments. This paper contributes three main results: (1) It is proved that the minimum volume of a certain type of three-dimensional drawing of a graph $G$ is closely related to the queue-number of $G$. In particular, if $G$ is an $n$-vertex member of a proper minor-closed family of graphs (such as a planar graph), then $G$ has a $O(1)\times O(1)\times O(n)$ drawing if and only if $G$ has O(1) queue-number. (2) It is proved that queue-number is bounded by tree-width, thus resolving an open problem due to Ganley and Heath (2001), and disproving a conjecture of Pemmaraju (1992). This result provides renewed hope for the positive resolution of a number of open problems in the theory of queue layouts. (3) It is proved that graphs of bounded tree-width have three-dimensional drawings with O(n) volume. This is the most general family of graphs known to admit three-dimensional drawings with O(n) volume. The proofs depend upon our results regarding \emph{track layouts} and \emph{tree-partitions} of graphs, which may be of independent interest.Comment: This is a revised version of a journal paper submitted in October 2002. This paper incorporates the following conference papers: (1) Dujmovic', Morin & Wood. Path-width and three-dimensional straight-line grid drawings of graphs (GD'02), LNCS 2528:42-53, Springer, 2002. (2) Wood. Queue layouts, tree-width, and three-dimensional graph drawing (FSTTCS'02), LNCS 2556:348--359, Springer, 2002. (3) Dujmovic' & Wood. Tree-partitions of $k$-trees with applications in graph layout (WG '03), LNCS 2880:205-217, 200

Rectilinear Crossing Number of Graphs Excluding Single-Crossing Graphs as Minors

The crossing number of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of crossings in a drawing of $G$ in the plane. A rectilinear drawing of a graph $G$ represents vertices of $G$ by a set of points in the plane and represents each edge of $G$ by a straight-line segment connecting its two endpoints. The rectilinear crossing number of $G$ is the minimum number of crossings in a rectilinear drawing of $G$. By the crossing lemma, the crossing number of an $n$-vertex graph $G$ can be $O(n)$ only if $|E(G)|\in O(n)$. Graphs of bounded genus and bounded degree (B\"{o}r\"{o}czky, Pach and T\'{o}th, 2006) and in fact all bounded degree proper minor-closed families (Wood and Telle, 2007) have been shown to admit linear crossing number, with tight $\Theta(\Delta n)$ bound shown by Dujmovi\'c, Kawarabayashi, Mohar and Wood, 2008. Much less is known about rectilinear crossing number. It is not bounded by any function of the crossing number. We prove that graphs that exclude a single-crossing graph as a minor have the rectilinear crossing number $O(\Delta n)$. This dependence on $n$ and $\Delta$ is best possible. A single-crossing graph is a graph whose crossing number is at most one. Thus the result applies to $K_5$-minor-free graphs, for example. It also applies to bounded treewidth graphs, since each family of bounded treewidth graphs excludes some fixed planar graph as a minor. Prior to our work, the only bounded degree minor-closed families known to have linear rectilinear crossing number were bounded degree graphs of bounded treewidth (Wood and Telle, 2007), as well as, bounded degree $K_{3,3}$-minor-free graphs (Dujmovi\'c, Kawarabayashi, Mohar and Wood, 2008). In the case of bounded treewidth graphs, our $O(\Delta n)$ result is again tight and improves on the previous best known bound of $O(\Delta^2 n)$ by Wood and Telle, 2007 (obtained for convex geometric drawings)

Anagram-Free Chromatic Number is not Pathwidth-Bounded

The anagram-free chromatic number is a new graph parameter introduced independently Kam\v{c}ev, {\L}uczak, and Sudakov (2017) and Wilson and Wood (2017). In this note, we show that there are planar graphs of pathwidth 3 with arbitrarily large anagram-free chromatic number. More specifically, we describe $2n$-vertex planar graphs of pathwidth 3 with anagram-free chromatic number $\Omega(\log n)$. We also describe $kn$ vertex graphs with pathwidth $2k-1$ having anagram-free chromatic number in $\Omega(k\log n)$.Comment: 8 pages, 3 figure