29 research outputs found

    Severe congenital microcephaly with AP4M1 mutation, a case report

    Get PDF
    Background: Autosomal recessive defects of either the B1, E1, M1 or S1 subunit of the Adaptor Protein complex-4 (AP4) are characterized by developmental delay, severe intellectual disability, spasticity, and occasionally mild to moderate microcephaly of essentially postnatal onset. Case presentation: We report on a patient with severe microcephaly of prenatal onset, and progressive spasticity, developmental delay, and severe intellectual deficiency. Exome sequencing showed a homozygous mutation in AP4M1, causing the replacement of an arginine by a stop codon at position 338 of the protein (p.Arg338X). The premature stop codon truncates the Mu homology domain of AP4M1, with predicted loss of function. Exome analysis also showed heterozygous variants in three genes, ATR, MCPH1 and BLM, which are known causes of autosomal recessive primary microcephaly. Conclusions: Our findings expand the AP4M1 phenotype to severe microcephaly of prenatal onset, and more generally suggest that the AP4 defect might share mechanisms of prenatal neuronal depletion with other genetic defects of brain development causing congenital, primary microcephaly

    Twist exome capture allows for lower average sequence coverage in clinical exome sequencing

    Get PDF
    Background Exome and genome sequencing are the predominant techniques in the diagnosis and research of genetic disorders. Sufficient, uniform and reproducible/consistent sequence coverage is a main determinant for the sensitivity to detect single-nucleotide (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs). Here we compared the ability to obtain comprehensive exome coverage for recent exome capture kits and genome sequencing techniques. Results We compared three different widely used enrichment kits (Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V5, Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V7 and Twist Bioscience) as well as short-read and long-read WGS. We show that the Twist exome capture significantly improves complete coverage and coverage uniformity across coding regions compared to other exome capture kits. Twist performance is comparable to that of both short- and long-read whole genome sequencing. Additionally, we show that even at a reduced average coverage of 70× there is only minimal loss in sensitivity for SNV and CNV detection. Conclusion We conclude that exome sequencing with Twist represents a significant improvement and could be performed at lower sequence coverage compared to other exome capture techniques

    A Solve-RD ClinVar-based reanalysis of 1522 index cases from ERN-ITHACA reveals common pitfalls and misinterpretations in exome sequencing

    Get PDF
    Purpose Within the Solve-RD project (https://solve-rd.eu/), the European Reference Network for Intellectual disability, TeleHealth, Autism and Congenital Anomalies aimed to investigate whether a reanalysis of exomes from unsolved cases based on ClinVar annotations could establish additional diagnoses. We present the results of the “ClinVar low-hanging fruit” reanalysis, reasons for the failure of previous analyses, and lessons learned. Methods Data from the first 3576 exomes (1522 probands and 2054 relatives) collected from European Reference Network for Intellectual disability, TeleHealth, Autism and Congenital Anomalies was reanalyzed by the Solve-RD consortium by evaluating for the presence of single-nucleotide variant, and small insertions and deletions already reported as (likely) pathogenic in ClinVar. Variants were filtered according to frequency, genotype, and mode of inheritance and reinterpreted. Results We identified causal variants in 59 cases (3.9%), 50 of them also raised by other approaches and 9 leading to new diagnoses, highlighting interpretation challenges: variants in genes not known to be involved in human disease at the time of the first analysis, misleading genotypes, or variants undetected by local pipelines (variants in off-target regions, low quality filters, low allelic balance, or high frequency). Conclusion The “ClinVar low-hanging fruit” analysis represents an effective, fast, and easy approach to recover causal variants from exome sequencing data, herewith contributing to the reduction of the diagnostic deadlock

    Hérédité monogénique et digénique de la microcéphalie primaire

    No full text
    Primary Microcephalies (PMs) are characterized by a small head since birth, resulting from an insufficient production of mature neurons during neurogenesis. PMs carry a heavy burden of intellectual deficiency, and serve as model diseases for brain volumic development. Known PM genes are ascribed to several cellular pathways such as the centriole duplication pathway, the control of cellcycle checkpoints and the general control of DNA replication licensing, although the exact mechanisms remain unclear. Genes causing monogenic forms of PM can be identified in fewer than 50% of patients. Digenic inheritance has recently been described in the mouse for PM caused by Aspm and Wdr62, but it is not known whether this applies to humans. The genetic dissection of PM will provide interesting clues about the cellular mechanisms involved.In this study, we used two different holistic, in vivo approaches: high throughput DNA sequencing of multiple PM genes in human PM patients, and genome-edited zebrafish modeling of selected PM genes.Analysis of a large mostly outbred PM cohort revealed 15 novel mutations in known PM genes, ASPM and WDR62 being the most frequently mutated. Mutations in AP4M1 and TRAPPC9 were for the first time associated with PM in two families. A mutation in MCPH1 truncating the last BRCT domain was surprisingly not associated with PM. The analysis of the exome cohort also revealed variants in four candidate genes that are not yet associated with human pathologies. Furthermore, exomes of PM patients showed a significant excess of variants in 75 PM genes, that persisted after removing monogenic causes of PM. A PM gene panel showed that the burden was carried by six centrosomal genes. In zebrafish, non-centrosomal gene casc5 biallelic invalidation produced a severe PM phenotype, that was not modified by centrosomal genes aspm or wdr62 invalidation. A digenic, quadriallelic PM phenotype was produced by aspm and wdr62. Digenic analysis of the PM cohort revealed candidates for digenic inheritance, among which heterozygous mutations in CEP135 and WDR62 in one PM patient.In this study, we widened the spectrum of known deleterious mutations in PM genes and provided detailed patients’ clinical information, improving genetic counseling provided to families. We expanded AP4M1 and TRAPPC9 phenotypes to severe microcephaly of prenatal onset, and suggested a bifunctional model of MCPH1 where the centrosomal function is involved in brain volumic development and not the DNA Damage Repair function. We presented four interesting candidate genes for PM that need further investigations. Moreover, our observations provided strong evidence for digenic inheritance of human PM, involving centrosomal genes. Absence of genetic interaction between casc5 and aspm or wdr62 delineated centrosomal and non-centrosomal pathways in PM. Candidate pairs for digenic inheritance in human PM will be worth investigating in the future and will contribute to unravel the complex genetic architecture of PM.Les MicrocĂ©phalies Primaires (MPs) sont caractĂ©risĂ©es par une tĂȘte trop petite dĂšs la naissance, rĂ©sultant d’une production insuffisante de neurones durant le dĂ©veloppement embryonnaire. Les MPs sont responsables d’une lourde charge de dĂ©ficits intellectuels, et servent de maladies modĂšles pour le dĂ©veloppement volumique cĂ©rĂ©bral. Les gĂšnes connus de MP appartiennent Ă  des voies cellulaires distinctes, comme la duplication centriolaire, le contrĂŽle du cycle cellulaire et le contrĂŽle gĂ©nĂ©ral de la rĂ©plication de l’ADN, bien que le mĂ©canisme exact responsable des MP ne soit pas clair. Des gĂšnes causant des formes monogĂ©niques de MP sont identifiĂ©s dans moins de 50% des patients. Une hĂ©rĂ©ditĂ© digĂ©nique a rĂ©cemment Ă©tĂ© dĂ©crite chez la souris pour la MP causĂ©e par Aspm et Wdr62, mais il n’est pas clair que ceci s’applique aussi Ă  l’humain. La dissection gĂ©nĂ©tique de la MP pourra fournir des informations intĂ©ressantes concernant les mĂ©canismes cellulaires impliquĂ©s.Dans cette Ă©tude, nous avons utilisĂ© deux approches holistiques, in vivo :sĂ©quençage Ă  haut dĂ©bit de multiples gĂšnes de MP chez des patients MP humains, et invalidation de gĂšnes sĂ©lectionnĂ©s de MP chez le poisson-zĂšbre.L’analyse d’une large cohorte de patients MP a rĂ©vĂ©lĂ© 15 nouvelles mutations dans des gĂšnes MP connus, ASPM et WDR62 Ă©tant les gĂšnes les plus frĂ©quemment mutĂ©s. Des mutations dans les gĂšnes AP4M1 et TRAPPC9 ont Ă©tĂ© associĂ©es Ă  la MP dans deux familles. Une mutation dans le gĂšne MCPH1 tronquant le dernier domaine BRCT n’a Ă©tonnamment pas Ă©tĂ© associĂ©e Ă  la MP. L’analyse de la cohorte a aussi rĂ©vĂ©lĂ© des variants dans quatre gĂšnes candidats n’ayant pas encore Ă©tĂ© associĂ©s Ă  des pathologies humaines. De plus, l’analyse d’exomes de patients MP a montrĂ© un excĂšs significatif de variants dans 75 gĂšnes MP, persistant aprĂšs retrait des causes monogĂ©niques de MP. Un panel de gĂšnes MP a montrĂ© que l’excĂšs de variants Ă©tait portĂ© par six gĂšnes centrosomaux. Chez le poisson-zĂšbre, l’invalidation biallĂ©lique du gĂšne non centrosomal casc5 a induit un phĂ©notype de MP sĂ©vĂšre, non modifiĂ© par l’invalidation des gĂšnes centrosomaux aspm ou wdr62. Un phĂ©notype de MP digĂ©nique, quadriallĂ©lique, a Ă©tĂ© induit par aspm et wdr62. L’analyse digĂ©nique de la cohorte MP a rĂ©vĂ©lĂ© des candidats pour une hĂ©rĂ©ditĂ© digĂ©nique, parmi lesquels des mutations hĂ©tĂ©rozygotes dans les gĂšnes CEP135 et WDR62 chez un patient MP.Dans cette Ă©tude, nous Ă©largissons le spectre des mutations dĂ©lĂ©tĂšres connues dans les gĂšnes MP et nous fournissons des renseignements cliniques dĂ©taillĂ©s au sujet des patients, deux Ă©lĂ©ments aboutissant Ă  l’amĂ©lioration du conseil gĂ©nĂ©tique apportĂ© aux familles. Nous Ă©tendons les phĂ©notypes AP4M1 et TRAPPC9 Ă  une MP sĂ©vĂšre, et suggĂ©rons un modĂšle bifonctionnel de MCPH1 oĂč seule la fonction centrosomale serait impliquĂ©e dans le dĂ©veloppement volumique cĂ©rĂ©bral, et pas la fonction de rĂ©paration de l’ADN. Nous prĂ©sentons quatre gĂšnes candidats intĂ©ressants pour la MP, qui nĂ©cessiteront des investigations supplĂ©mentaires. De plus, nos observations apportent des preuves fortes en faveur de l’existence d’une hĂ©rĂ©ditĂ© digĂ©nique dans la MP, impliquant des gĂšnes centrosomaux. L’absence d’interaction gĂ©nĂ©tique entre casc5 d’une part, et aspm ou wdr62 d’autre part, distingue des voies centrosomale et non centrosomale dans la MP. Des paires candidates pour une hĂ©rĂ©ditĂ© digĂ©nique dans la MP humaine pourront faire l’objet de recherches intĂ©ressantes durant les prochaines annĂ©es, contribuant Ă  Ă©claircir l’architecture gĂ©nĂ©tique complexe de la MP.Doctorat en Sciences mĂ©dicales (MĂ©decine)info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublishe

    The genetics of congenitally small brains.

    No full text
    Primary microcephaly (PM) refers to a congenitally small brain, resulting from insufficient prenatal production of neurons, and serves as a model disease for brain volumic development. Known PM genes delineate several cellular pathways, among which the centriole duplication pathway, which provide interesting clues about the cellular mechanisms involved. The general interest of the genetic dissection of PM is illustrated by the convergence of Zika virus infection and PM gene mutations on congenital microcephaly, with CENPJ/CPAP emerging as a key target. Physical (protein-protein) and genetic (digenic inheritance) interactions of Wdr62 and Aspm have been demonstrated in mice, and should now be sought in humans using high throughput parallel sequencing of multiple PM genes in PM patients and control subjects, in order to categorize mutually interacting genes, hence delineating functional pathways in vivo in humans.SCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly due to ASPM mutations: An update

    No full text
    Autosomal recessive microcephaly or microcephaly primary hereditary (MCPH) is a genetically heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a reduction in brain volume, indirectly measured by an occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) 2 standard deviations or more below the age- and sex-matched mean (−2SD) at birth and −3SD after 6 months, and leading to intellectual disability of variable severity. The abnormal spindle-like microcephaly gene (ASPM), the human ortholog of the Drosophila melanogaster “abnormal spindle” gene (asp), encodes ASPM, a protein localized at the centrosome of apical neuroprogenitor cells and involved in spindle pole positioning during neurogenesis. Loss-of-function mutations in ASPM cause MCPH5, which affects the majority of all MCPH patients worldwide. Here, we report 47 unpublished patients from 39 families carrying 28 new ASPM mutations, and conduct an exhaustive review of the molecular, clinical, neuroradiological, and neuropsychological features of the 282 families previously reported (with 161 distinct ASPM mutations). Furthermore, we show that ASPM-related microcephaly is not systematically associated with intellectual deficiency and discuss the association between the structural brain defects (strong reduction in cortical volume and surface area) that modify the cortical map of these patients and their cognitive abilities.0SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Phenotypes in siblings with homozygous mutations of TRAPPC9 and/or MCPH1 support a bifunctional model of MCPH1.

    No full text
    Autosomal recessive intellectual disability (ARID) is vastly heterogeneous. Truncating mutations of TRAPPC9 were reported in 8 ARID families. Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) represents another subgroup of ARID, itself very heterogeneous, where the size of the brain is very small since birth. MCPH1 plays a role at the centrosome via a BRCT1 domain, and in DNA Damage Repair (DDR) via BRCT2 and BRCT3, and it is not clear which of these two mechanisms causes MCPH in man.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
    corecore