A ten-year observational study of the use of two-way catheters post-transurethral resection of the prostate without the use of post-op irrigation

Background: Over 15,000 transurethral resections of the prostate (TURP) are performed annually in the United Kingdom. It is therefore vital that every aspect of peri-operative care be optimised. Our centre favours the use of two-way catheters post-operatively without the use of continuous bladder irrigation (CBI). Objectives: To evaluate our practice of using two-way catheters without irrigation post-TURP and to determine impact on patient care compared with standard three-way catheterisation. Our primary outcome was duration of admission, but multiple secondary outcomes were also analysed. Design, setting, and participants: This was a prospective observational study. Every patient undergoing TURP at our centre from 2009 to 2019 was included. Following TURP patients were catheterised with two-way catheters. Prospective patient data were collected pertaining to peri-operative factors. These data were then compared with the data published in the literature. Results: 687 patients underwent TURP at our centre between 2009 and 2019. The average age of patients was 71.42 (±7.89). 87.17% (n = 598) had two-way catheters placed post-operatively. Average duration of admission was 1.61 (±1.35) days, increasing to 2.20 days if patients required three-way catheters or 2.53 days if requiring CBI. TWOC was successful in 97.71% of patients. Complication rate was 8.73% (n = 60). When compared with other centres, our method reduced lengths of admission and transfusion rates (1.6 days versus 3.1 days and 0.87% versus 2.83%, respectively). Conclusion: Our method is safe and is associated with a reduced length of admission. We recommend this practice to the wider urological community. Patient summary: This study looked at whether there was any impact on patients if two-way catheters were used following TURP. We found that use of two-way catheters reduced length of admission and duration of catheterisation. We also found that it did not increase likelihood of peri-operative complications in comparison with other centres

HaEmaturia After Transurethral resection of bladder Tumour (HEATT): A multicentre, regional collaborative analysis of factors associated with emergency re-admission with haematuria following TURBT

Objective: To calculate the re-admission rate with haematuria within 30 days of elective transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT), and identify factors associated with this. Materials and Methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective audit, identifying all adult patients over the age of 16 who underwent elective TURBT between 1 September and 30 November 2019. Data were collected from medical records and operation notes on patient demographics, intra-operative factors and post-operative management. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients emergently re-admitted with haematuria. Secondary outcome measures were the re-operation rate for haematuria, and the rate of new acute thrombotic event (TE). Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate p values within subgroups for re-admission rates. Results: 443 patients from 12 hospitals were included. Median age was 75 years (17–99). 15 patients (3.4%) were re-admitted with haematuria. Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher rate of re-admission for pre-existing antithrombotic agents (ATAs) (2.0% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.046), increased for non-Aspirin ATAs (10.5%, p = 0.0015). 52% of non-Aspirin ATAs were restarted within 48 hours of surgery; post-operative plan for restarting was not documented in 22.1%. One patient (0.23%) developed acute TE (pulmonary embolus). Conclusion: Pre-existing use of non-Aspirin ATAs is associated with increased risk of post-TURBT haematuria, with variable practice in post-operative recommencement. Level of evidence: Level

The Effect of Dutasteride on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Defined Prostate Cancer: MAPPED-A Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

International audiencePURPOSE: Dutasteride, which is licensed for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, has been associated with a lower progression rate of low risk prostate cancer. We evaluated the effect of dutasteride on prostate cancer volume as assessed by T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial, men with biopsy proven, low-intermediate risk prostate cancer (up to Gleason 3 + 4 and PSA up to 15 ng/ml) who had visible lesion of 0.2 ml or greater on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences were randomized to daily dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo for 6 months. Lesion volume was assessed at baseline, and 3 and 6 months with image guided biopsy to the lesion at study exit. The primary end point was the percent reduction in lesion volume over 6 months. This trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials register (EudraCT 2009-102405-18).RESULTS: A total of 42 men were recruited between June 2010 and January 2012. In the dutasteride group, the average volumes at baseline and 6 months were 0.55 and 0.38 ml, respectively and the average reduction was 36%. In the placebo group, the average volumes at baseline and 6 months were 0.65 and 0.76 ml, respectively, and the average reduction was -12%. The difference in percent reductions between the groups was 48% (95% CI 27.4-68.3, p <0.0001). The most common adverse event was deterioration in erectile function, which was 25% in men randomized to dutasteride and 16% in men randomized to placebo.CONCLUSIONS: Dutasteride was associated with a significant reduction in prostate cancer volume on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared to placebo