FRI0191 CRANIAL-LIMITED AND LARGE-VESSEL GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: PRESENTING FEATURES AND OUTCOME

Background:Giant cell arteritis (GCA) comprises two main phenotypes: cranial (C) and large-vessel (LV) disease1. A full baseline steroid-free vascular imaging evaluation is required to properly diagnose LV involvement2Objectives:To compare presenting and prognostic features of LV-GCA and C-GCA patients after an adequate vascular imaging evaluation at baselineMethods:Data from GCA patients followed-up at our Institution were retrospectively collected. Only patients who underwent large-vessel imaging (PET, CTA, MRA) at disease onset or within 1 week after steroid introduction were included. Patients with evidence of LV involvement were classified as LV-GCA. Differences between LV-GCA and C-GCA patients regarding presenting features, treatment, prognosis were evaluated. Non-parametric tests were usedResults:In our cohort, we identified 161/280 patients who underwent LV-imaging study at baseline. Of these, 100 (62.1%) had signs of LV inflammation. Table 1 compares demographic features, diagnostic delay, pre-existing comorbidities and complementary treatment between the 2 groups. Table 2 compares disease features at diagnosis. Mean follow-up was similar between LV- and C-GCA patients (31.8±31.8 vs 27.8±29.1 months; 70% vs 73.8% followed-up ≥12 months). Corrected cumulative prednisone dose (CCPD, grams/months) was equivalent (LV, 0.67±0.57; C, 0.87±1.37; p=0.871). A DMARD was added in 73% of LV- and in 55.7% of C-GCA patients (p=0.027), but, notably, it was introduced at baseline in 52% of LV- vs 23.5% of C-GCA patients (p=0.006). CCPD was equivalent even considering only patients who did not receive DMARDs (LV, 0.92±0.81; C, 0.94±1.18; p=0.522). Frequency of relapses was not significantly different (LV, 51%; C, 57.3%, p=0.515), even when considering only DMARD-receiving patients (LV, 36.1%; C, 38.2%, p=0.833). Aortic aneurysms incidence at 5 years was similar (LV, 17.3%; C, 15.7%; p=0.826). Rate of metabolic and infective complications was similar, in terms of arterial hypertension (LV, 3%; C, 0%, p=0.286), diabetes (2% vs 0%, p=0.524), osteoporotic fractures (7% vs 5%, p=0.742), severe infections (3% vs 3.3%, p=1)Table 1.Demographic features, diagnostic delay, pre-existing comorbidities, and complementary treatment at baseline in LV and C-GCA patientsLV imaging +n=100 (%)LV imaging-n=61 (%)p-valueAge (years)73.2 ± 8.976 ± 8.80.018Sex (female)65 (65)40 (65)1Diagnostic delay (months)3.5 ± 4.62.3 ± 4.90.001Pre-existing comorbidities- CAD3 (3)7 (11.5)0.043- Diabetes4 (4)6 (9.8)0.181- Dyslipidemia17 (17)17 (27.9)0.114- Hypertension42 (42)34 (55.7)0.105- Stroke3 (3)3 (5)0.674- Cancer20 (20)6 (9.8)0.122Ongoing complementary treatment- Antiplatelet18 (18)15 (25)0.322- Anticoagulant1 (1)6 (9.8)0.012- Statin14 (14)14 (23)0.198Table 2.Diseases features at onset in LV and C-GCA patientsLV imaging +n=100 (%)LV imaging-n=61 (%)p-valueTemporal biopsy positive17/31 (55)9(43)0.573Symptoms- Headache65 (65)52 (85)0.006- Jaw claudication22 (22)20 (32.8)0.142- Scalp tenderness31 (31)26 (42.6)0.174- Ocular symptoms14 (14)20 (32.8)0.006- Ischemic optic neuropathy7 (7)17 (27.9)<0.001- Stroke3 (3)0 (0)0.290- Polymyalgia rheumatica42 (42)31 (50.8)0.328- Fever44 (44)12 (19.7)0.002- Fatigue72 (72)21 (34.4)<0.001- Weight loss37 (37)7 (11.5)<0.001- Cough10 (10)1 (1.6)0.053Laboratory findings, mean- C-reactive protein, mg/L80.8 ± 60.865.7 ± 58.20.057- Erythrocyte sedimentation rate76.8 ± 3071.5 ± 270.360- Hemoglobin, g/dL11.4 ± 1.512 ± 1.60.007- Platelet count389.4 ± 116.6366.8 ± 125.20.758Conclusion:LV-GCA patients are younger and suffer of a greater diagnostic delay. Although a greater systemic inflammation seems to be a feature of LV-GCA patients, the vascular prognosis is similar to C-GCA patients, who, conversely, have a greater incidence of ocular complicationsReferences:[1]Dejaco C, et al. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2017)[2]Kermani T, et al. Rheumatology (2019)Disclosure of Interests:Alessandro Tomelleri: None declared, Corrado Campochiaro Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GSK, SOBI, Silvia Sartorelli: None declared, Nicola Farina: None declared, Elena Baldissera Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Alpha Sigma, Sanofi, Lorenzo Dagna Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, and SOB

FRI0506 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CANAKINUMAB IN ADULT-ONSET STILL'S DISEASE: A SINGLE-CENTER REAL-LIFE EXPERIENCE

Background:The pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-1 has a central role in the pathogenesis of adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD), a rare auto-inflammatory condition. Anakinra, has been for years the cornerstone of IL-1-blocking therapy in AOSD. More recently, the monoclonal antibody canakinumab, a new agent blocking IL-1, has become availableObjectives:To describe our real-life experience with CNK in a cohort of AOSD patients from a single Italian CenterMethods:AOSD patients diagnosed according to Yamaguchi's criteria followed-up at our Autoinflammatory Unit and treated with CNK for at least 3 months were included. Demographic features, disease characteristics, reasons for CNK introduction, concomitant therapies, variation in systemic steroids dose, adverse events, and response to treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical comparisonResults:13 patients (5 women; median age 49 years, range 21-74), treated with subcutaneous CNK 4 mg/kg 4-weekly, were identified. Median disease duration before CNK introduction was 12 (6-240) months. After CNK introduction, 2 patients were followed-up for 18 months, 3 for 12 months, 6 for 6 months, 2 for 3 months. CNK was introduced as first-line biologic DMARD in 6 patients. The other 7 patients had been already treated with at least one other bDMARD, for a total of 15 treatment courses (7, anakinra, ANK; 4, tocilizumab; 4, TNF-inhibitors), with a median bDMARD therapy duration of 8 (4-178) months. Previous bDMARDs had been interrupted because of inefficacy (8 cases) or adverse events (AE, 7 cases); of the 7 ANK-treated patients, therapy interruption was due to inefficacy in 3 cases. At CNK introduction, 11 patients were on systemic steroid therapy, prednisone (PDN) equivalent dose 15 (5-80) mg, and 10 were concomitantly receiving a conventional DMARD (7, methotrexate; 2, colchicine; 1, cyclosporine-A).Graphic 1summarizes main clinical features at CNK introduction. After CNK start, a striking and rapid clinical response was observed, as demonstrated by a substantial decrease of modified Pouchot score and a normalization of acute phase reactants after only 3 months (see Table 1 for details). CNK showed also a significant steroid-sparing effect: median PDN dose was reduced to 7.5 (2.5-12.5) mg at month 3 and 5 (0-7.5) mg at month 6; PDN was stopped in 3 patients (1 at month 3, 1 at month 6, 1 at month 12) due to optimal disease control. CNK was temporarily held-off in 3 patients (zoster reactivation, 1; prostatitis, 1; mild leukopenia, 1). We observed no case of primary inefficacyTable 1.Disease activity and blood tests at canakinumab introduction and during follow-upDaily prednisone dosemgBaseline(n=13)3 months(n=13)6 months(n=11)12 months(n=5)18 months(n=2)Pouchot score15 (5-80)7.5 (2.5-12.5)5 (0-7.5)5 (0-7.5)2.5VAS pain3 (2-5)1 (0-2)0 (0-1)00Erythrocyte sedimentation ratemm/h7 (2-10)3 (1-8)2 (1-4)1 (1-2)1C-reactive proteinmg/L42 (8-120)21 (2-69)13 (2-55)14 (2-41)11Ferritinng/mL20.8 (3-180)3.1 (0.5-22.5)1.6 (0.5-8.4)1 (0.3-6.3)0.5Hemoglobing/dL379.5 (161-914)282 (82-552)215 (34-464)177 (77-401)19913.1 (9.4-15.7)13.2 (10.7-15.3)13.8 (11.5-15.5)13.9 (11.3-14.3)13.5Figure 1.Graphic 1 Main clinical features at canakinumab introductionConclusion:Our real-life data confirm that CNK is highly effective and safe in AOSD treatment and has significant steroid-sparing effects. CNK showed its efficacy both as first-line therapy and after other bDMARDs failure, also in patients who have previously failed IL-1 inhibition through ANKReferences:[1] Cavalli G, et al. Treating rheumatological diseases and co-morbidities with interleukin-1 blocking therapies. Rheumatology (2015)[2] Cavalli G, et al. Efficacy of Canakinumab as First-Line Biologic Agent in Adult-Onset Still's Disease. Arthritis Res Ther (2019)Disclosure of Interests:Alessandro Tomelleri: None declared, Corrado Campochiaro Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GSK, SOBI, Giacomo De Luca Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, MSD, Nicola Farina: None declared, Elena Baldissera Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Alpha Sigma, Sanofi, Giulio Cavalli Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Pfizer, Lorenzo Dagna Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, and SOB

FRI0325 Prevalence of takayasu arteritis in young women with acute ischemic heart disease

n/

The treatment of adult-onset Still’s disease with anakinra, a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist: a systematic review of the literature

Adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) is a rare, inflammatory disease of unknown aetiology, generally affecting young adults and requiring immunosuppressive treatment. In the last few years, biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have been successfully used in refractory cases, based on the pathogenic role of inflammatory cytokines in AOSD. Amongst bDMARDs, several observations confirmed the clinical usefulness of anakinra, a recombinant human non-glycosylated IL-1 receptor antagonist, in AOSD. At present, the treatment is still largely empirical and due to the possible fallacious aspects of clinical judgement, in this work, we performed a systematic review of literature (SRL) to summarise the evidence regarding the treatment with anakinra in AOSD, analysing rate of complete remission, corticosteroids (CCSs)-sparing effect, long-term retention rate, and safety. After screening titles, abstracts and analysis of full text, 15 manuscripts were analysed: 1 open randomised multicentre trial with two parallel groups and 14 observational single-arm retrospective studies. Collectively, results of the present SRL suggest the effectiveness of anakinra in the treatment of patients with AOSD. Furthermore, patients with AOSD are likely to achieve a good clinical response with anakinra and these outcomes are associated with a largely favourable safety profile. Furthermore, the majority of patients treated with anakinra may achieve a complete remission, also in monotherapy. Finally, the treatment with anakinra is associated with an important CCSs-sparing effect, and, a large percentage of these patients may stop CCSs, thus reducing predictable long-term CCSs side effects without the occurrence of new flares. © Copyright CliniCal and Experimental Rheumatology 2021

POS1247 CLINICAL FEATURES AND OUTCOMES OF COVID-19 IN PATIENTS WITH IGG4-RELATED DISEASE. A COLLABORATIVE EUROPEAN MULTI-CENTRE STUDY

Background:Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic-spread systemic infectious disease with prominent respiratory manifestations and significant associated morbidity and mortality. Elderly people are most significantly affected with mortality ranging from 2.4% (age 60-69) to 19.6% (age>80) in European Countries. The prevalence of COVID-19 and of its complications in patients with immune-mediated disorders, remains unclear. The frequency and impact of COVID-19 on patients with IgG4-related diease (IgG4-RD), many of whom are on concurrent immunosuppression has not been addressed.Objectives:To assess the epidemiological and clinical relevance of COVID-19 in patients with IgG4-RD.Methods:This is a multi-centre retrospective observational study of IgG4-RD patients from France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. Demographics, comorbidities, IgG4-RD features, current and past treatment along with COVID-19-suggestive symptoms and COVID-19 diagnoses from February 2020 to January 2021 were recorded by means of direct or phone interviews. Patients with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction-confirmed (cCOVID) or presumed COVID-19 based on clinical, serological or imaging features (pCOVID) were pooled for analysis (totCOVID) and compared to patients who were not diagnosed with COVID-19. Inter-group comparison of categorical and quantitative variables were performed by using the chi-square test with Fisher's correction and the Mann-Whitney's test respectively. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise specified.Results:A total of 305 patients [71% males, median age 64 (54-74) years] were studied. Pancreato-biliary disease was the most frequently observed IgG4-RD phenotype (39%). Fifty-one percent of patients were taking corticosteroids at time of interview and 30% were on biological or conventional immunosuppressants. Thirty-two totCOVID cases (23 cCOVID, nine pCOVID) were identified: 11/32 were hospitalised, two needed intensive care and four (13%; 3/4 aged >80 years) died. Having one or more infected family members was a risk factor for COVID-19 in patients with IgG4-RD (OR=19.9; p20mg) or rituximab administration.Conclusion:The prevalence and course of COVID-19 in IgG4-RD patients are similar to those of the general population of the same age, with no evident impact of disease- or treatment-related factors to the basal infectious risk. Effective public health countermeasures might be beneficial for patients with IgG4RD.References:[1]European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC): https://covid19-surveillance-report.ecdc.europa.eu/[2]Yang H, Ann Rheum Dis, 2021Disclosure of Interests:Giuseppe Alvise Ramirez: None declared, Marco Lanzillotta: None declared, Mikael Ebbo: None declared, Andreu Fernandez-Codina Consultant of: consulting fees from Atheneum Consulting, Gaia Mancuso: None declared, Fernando Martínez-Valle: None declared, Olimpia Orozco-Galvez: None declared, Nicolas Schleinitz: None declared, Lorenzo Dagna Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BristolMyers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and SOBI, Grant/research support from: The Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases (UnIRAR) received unresctricted research/educational grants from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline,Janssen, Merk Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and SOBI, Emma L. Culver: None declared, Emanuel Della Torre: None declare

Trisomic dose of several chromosome 21 genes perturbs haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell differentiation in Down's syndrome

Children with Down's syndrome (DS) have 20–50-fold higher incidence of all leukaemias (lymphoid and myeloid), for reasons not understood. As incidence of many solid tumours is much lower in DS, we speculated that disturbed early haematopoietic differentiation could be the cause of increased leukaemia risk. If a common mechanism is behind the risk of both major leukaemia types, it would have to arise before the bifurcation to myeloid and lymphoid lineages. Using the transchromosomic system (mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs)) bearing an extra human chromosome 21 (HSA21)) we analyzed the early stages of haematopoietic commitment (mesodermal colony formation) in vitro. We observed that trisomy 21 (T21) causes increased production of haemogenic endothelial cells, haematopoietic stem cell precursors and increased colony forming potential, with significantly increased immature progenitors. Transchromosomic colonies showed increased expression of Gata-2, c-Kit and Tie-2. A panel of partial T21 ESCs allowed us to assign these effects to HSA21 sub-regions, mapped by 3.5 kbp-resolution tiling arrays. The Gata-2 increase on one side, and c-Kit and Tie-2 increases on the other, could be attributed to two different, non-overlapping HSA21 regions. Using human-specific small interfering RNA silencing, we could demonstrate that an extra copy of RUNX1, but not ETS-2 or ERG, causes an increase in Tie-2/c-Kit levels. Finally, we detected significantly increased levels of RUNX1, C-KIT and PU.1 in human foetal livers with T21. We conclude that overdose of more than one HSA21 gene contributes to the disturbance of early haematopoiesis in DS, and that one of the contributors is RUNX1. As the observed T21-driven hyperproduction of multipotential immature precursors precedes the bifurcation to lymphoid and myeloid lineages, we speculate that this could create conditions of increased chance for acquisition of pre-leukaemogenic rearrangements/mutations in both lymphoid and myeloid lineages during foetal haematopoiesis, contributing to the increased risk of both leukaemia types in DS

AB0370 UTILITY OF CRP AND ESR IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS RELAPSE IN A PHASE 2 TRIAL OF MAVRILIMUMAB

Background:No universally accepted definition of flare currently exists in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Although relapses are defined mostly on clinical grounds (recurrence of GCA-related signs/symptoms), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) help clinicians assess disease activity. In fact, >70% of patients on glucocorticoids (GCs) alone have increased CRP or ESR when the disease is active. In contrast, tocilizumab, given its IL-6-blockade effect in the liver, rapidly reduces CRP and ESR levels, rendering them unreliable for disease activity monitoring. Mavrilimumab – a GM-CSF receptor α inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in a Phase 2 GCA trial1 – downregulates inflammation upstream of IL-6. We hypothesized that mavrilimumab would not interfere with the utility of CRP and ESR in monitoring disease activity and in identifying GCA relapse.Objectives:To analyze the relationship between CRP/ESR and clinical disease activity in GCA patients treated with mavrilimumab.Methods:New-onset and relapsing GCA patients with active disease were recruited. GC-induced remission (no GCA symptoms and CRP <1 mg/dL or ESR <20 mm/hr) was required by baseline. Patients were randomized 3:2 to mavrilimumab 150 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks plus a protocol-defined 26-week prednisone taper. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to relapse by Week 26. Relapse (adjudicated) was defined as recurrent GCA-related signs/symptoms, including new/worsening vasculitis on imaging, concurrent with CRP ≥1 mg/dL and/or ESR ≥30 mm/hr. CRP and ESR were also measured periodically during the trial.This post hoc analysis assessed the association of recurrent GCA-related signs/symptoms with concurrent CRP or ESR elevation post-randomization by treatment arm. We also assessed the proportion of patients with CRP or ESR elevation without GCA-related signs/symptoms up to Week 26.Results:Seventy patients were enrolled (mavrilimumab, N=42; placebo, N=28). The association of CRP or ESR elevation with unequivocal GCA-related signs/symptoms post-randomization was consistent regardless of treatment arm: 8/8 in the mavrilimumab group and 13/13 in the placebo group (Table 1). During relapse, median (range) CRP was 1.8 (1.4 – 8.4) mg/dL (mavrilimumab group) and 1.8 (1.1 – 9.0) mg/dL (placebo group). Corresponding ESR values were 39.5 (30 – 102) mm/hr (mavrilimumab group) and 49 (31 – 101) mm/hr (placebo group). Four mavrilimumab recipients had self-limited, equivocal GCA-related signs/symptoms without concurrent CRP or ESR elevation; all 4 completed the prespecified GC taper by Week 26 without need for rescue GCs, so relapse was not confirmed. At least 1 elevated CRP or ESR value in the absence of GCA-related signs/symptoms was observed in 58.8% of mavrilimumab recipients and 93.3% of placebo recipients by Week 26.Conclusion:The observed association of CRP or ESR elevation with GCA-related signs/symptoms is consistent with the upstream mechanism and supports the utility of the stringent protocol definition of relapse. The frequency and magnitude of CRP and ESR elevations at relapse were similar in both treatment groups, suggesting that CRP and ESR remain useful in assessments of disease activity in mavrilimumab-treated patients. CRP and ESR elevations without GCA-related signs/symptoms occurred more often in placebo recipients.References:[1]Cid, Unizony et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10)Table 1.CRP and ESR levels in patients with or without GCA relapseAssessment§MavrilimumabPlaceboMavrilimumabPlaceboN=42N=28N=42N=28With RelapseWithout Relapse# of patients8 (19.1)13 (46.4)34 (81.0)15 (53.6) Elevated CRP* or ESR†8 (100.0)13 (100.0)20 (58.8)14 (93.3)  Elevated CRP*7 (87.5)10 (76.9)10 (29.4)11 (73.3)   Median (range) mg/dL1.8 (1.4 - 8.4)1.8 (1.1 - 9.0)2.6 (1.3 – 7.0)2.0 (1.0 – 6.6) Elevated ESR†6 (75.0)9 (69.2)16 (47.1)10 (66.7)  Median (range) mm/hr39.5 (30 - 102)49.0 (31 - 101)41.5 (30 - 110)53.5 (30 - 82)§# (%), except where indicated otherwise.*CRP ≥ 1 mg/dL†ESR ≥ 30 mm/hrDisclosure of Interests:Sebastian Unizony Consultant of: Janssen and Kiniksa, Grant/research support from: Genentech, Maria C. Cid Speakers bureau: Roche and Kiniksa, Paid instructor for: GSK and Vifor, Consultant of: Janssen, GSK, and Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Kiniksa, Elisabeth Brouwer Speakers bureau: Dr. E.Brouwer as an employee of the UMCG received speaker fees and consulting fees from Roche in 2017 2018 which were paid to the UMCG., Consultant of: Dr. E.Brouwer as an employee of the UMCG received speaker fees and consulting fees from Roche in 2017 2018 which were paid to the UMCG., Lorenzo Dagna Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Glaxo SmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Glaxo SmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI; clinical trial for Kiniksa, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, Merk Sharp &Dohme, Janssen, Kiniksa, Bhaskar Dasgupta Paid instructor for: Educational grant symposium/workshop for Roche-chugai, Sanofi, and Abbvie, Consultant of: CI UK for the Kiniksa trial, Grant/research support from: Educational grant symposium/workshop for Roche-chugai, Sanofi, and Abbvie, Bernhard Hellmich Consultant of: Honoraria paid to the institution for participation in the clinical trial, Eamonn Molloy: None declared, Carlo Salvarani: None declared, Bruce C. Trapnell Consultant of: Consultant member of DSMB for Kiniksa., Kenneth J Warrington Consultant of: Clinical trial support from Eli Lilly and Kiniksa, Ian Wicks: None declared, Manoj Samant Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Teresa Zhou Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Lara Pupim Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Kiniksa Pharmaceutical

POS1061 THE ITALIAN PROSPECTIVE SIRENA STUDY: FOCUS ON EARLY PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS COHORT AND GENDER DIFFERENCES

Background:Limited data on early Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) are available1,2.Objectives:To describe baseline data of PsA patients naive to any DMARDs.Methods:SIRENA study is an Italian, prospective Registry of Spondyloarthritis patients diagnosed according to ASAS criteria and naïve to any DMARDs. Data on demographic and clinical characteristics of PsA cohort were collected and analysed, also by gender.Results:203/350 (58%) subjects included in SIRENA Registry had PsA (mean age 51.9 years) and in 190/203 (94%) CASPAR classification criteria were fulfilled. In 70% of patients the diagnosis was performed within 24 months from symptom onset. At baseline, 194/203 (95.6%) had mainly peripheral manifestations, 74.4% of patients had skin psoriasis, 40% nail psoriasis, 39.3% clinical enthesitis and 25.9% dactylitis. Mean SJC66 and TJC68 were, respectively, 3 and 7.2; mean PhGA was 46.3; 14.7% of patients were in MDA.The higher tender joint count in women (mean TJC68 9.3 in women vs 5.3 in men) resulted in a higher disease activity according to DAPSA (high disease activity: 11.5% women vs 4.1% men), a higher joint VAS score (mean score 47.1 women vs 39.8 men) and a lower prevalence of MDA (8.3% women vs 20% men). We observed a higher prevalence of moderate or severe psoriasis in men (BSA≥3%: 37% men vs 27.8% women) while all PROs collected (PtGA, pain VAS score, sleep VAS score, BASFI, BASDAI, HAQ-DI, WPAI) were worse in women.The most common comorbidities were cardiometabolic (35.5%), endocrine (9.4%), and gastrointestinal disorders (7.4%). Cardiometabolic disorders were more frequently reported by men, endocrine and gastrointestinal disorders by women; depression exclusively by women.Conclusion:This analysis provides real-life data in a cohort of early PsA subjects. Relevant gender differences were observed, with women showing a higher disease activity and more joint pain and men having more severe psoriasis. Women also perceived a worse disease burden.References:[1]Theander E, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73:407–413.[2]Nas K, et al. Mod Rheumatol 2017; 27(2):345-349.Table 1.Baseline dataPsAAll patients (n=203)Women (n=98)Men (n=105)Age (years), mean (SD)51.9 (13.1)51.1 (13.2)52.7 (13.0)Men, n (%)105 (51.7)0 (0)105 (100)BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD)25.9 (4.4)25.4 (4.9)26.4 (3.9)BMI categories^, n (%) Obese40 (21.2)20 (22.2)20 (20.2) Overweight44 (23.3)15 (16.7)29 (29.3) Under/normal weight105 (55.6)55 (61.1)50 (50.5)Comorbidities > 5%*, n (%) Cardiometabolic72 (35.5)28 (28.6)44 (41.9) Endocrine disease19 (9.4)15 (15.3)4 (3.8) Gastrointestinal15 (7.4)10 (10.2)5 (4.8) Depression/Anxiety8 (3.9)8 (8.2)0 (0) Hepatic diseases7 (3.5)1 (1.0)6 (5.7)Clinical assessmentCRP (mg/dl), median (min-max)0.40 (0 – 7.12)0.31 (0 - 5.40)0.49 (0 - 7.12)SJC66, mean (SD)3.0 (4.0)3.2 (4.0)2.7 (4.0)TJC68, mean (SD)7.2 (8.8)9.3 (10.3)5.3 (6.6)Dactylitis, n/tot assessed (%)35/135 (25.9)12/63 (19.1)23/72 (31.9)Enthesitis, n/tot assessed (%)66/168 (39.3)39/80 (48.8)27/88 (30.7)Psoriasis skin, n (%)151 (74.4)68 (69.4)83 (79.1)Psoriasis nails, n/tot assessed (%)62/155 (40.0)29/75 (38.7)33/80 (41.3)Fibromyalgia, n (%)6 (3.0)5 (5.2)1 (1.0)VAS, mean (SD) [range: 0-100] PhGA score46.3 (25.8)51.2 (25.4)41.7 (25.4) Joint score43.3 (26.8)47.1 (25.2)39.8 (27.8) Skin score20.3 (24.0)17.8 (23.1)22.6 (24.8)DAPSA, mean (SD)22.3 (14.1)26.8 (15.4)18.7 (11.9)DAPSA categories^, n (%)High disease activity13 (7.4)9 (11.5)4 (4.1)Moderate disease activity83 (47.2)43 (55.1)40 (40.8)Low disease activity71 (40.3)24 (30.8)47 (48.0)Remission9 (5.1)2 (2.6)7 (7.1)MDA°, n (%)23 (14.7)6 (8.3)17 (20.0)BSA categories, n (%) 3-10% (moderate psoriasis)35 (24.6)13 (21.2)22 (27.1) >10% (severe psoriasis)12 (8.5)4 (6.6)8 (9.9)* A patient could report one or more comorbidities. ^The sum does not add up to the total because of some missing values. ° According to Coates et al. (Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69: 48).Disclosure of Interests:Alen Zabotti: None declared, Michele Maria Luchetti Speakers bureau: Honorary fees for conferences and workshops by Janssen, Abbvie, Novartis, Lilly, Celgene, Pfizer, Carlo Selmi Speakers bureau: Honoraria and/or speaker bureau from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Regeneron, Grant/research support from: Research support from Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roberta Ramonda Speakers bureau: Honoraria and speaker fees from Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen, Rosa Daniela Grembiale: None declared, Lorenzo Dagna Consultant of: Consultation honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and SOBI, Salvatore D'Angelo Speakers bureau: Consulting fees and/or speakers bureau from AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB, Giacomo Cafaro: None declared, Salvatore De Vita: None declared, Mara Felicetti: None declared, Silvia Marelli Employee of: Janssen-Cilag SpA, Daniela Frigerio Employee of: Janssen-Cilag SpA, Ennio Favalli Speakers bureau: Consulting fees and/or speaking engagements from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Galapagos, Sanofi-Genzyme, and UCB

Efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in giant cell arteritis: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is implicated in pathogenesis of giant cell arteritis. We evaluated the efficacy of the GM-CSF receptor antagonist mavrilimumab in maintaining disease remission. METHODS: This phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients with biopsy-confirmed or imaging-confirmed giant cell arteritis in 50 centres (North America, Europe, Australia). Active disease within 6 weeks of baseline was required for inclusion. Patients in glucocorticoid-induced remission were randomly assigned (3:2 ratio) to mavrilimumab 150 mg or placebo injected subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Both groups received a 26-week prednisone taper. The primary outcome was time to adjudicated flare by week 26. A prespecified secondary efficacy outcome was sustained remission at week 26 by Kaplan-Meier estimation. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 42 mavrilimumab recipients, flare occurred in 19% (n=8). Of 28 placebo recipients, flare occurred in 46% (n=13). Median time to flare (primary outcome) was 25.1 weeks in the placebo group, but the median was not reached in the mavrilimumab group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.92; p=0.026). Sustained remission at week 26 was 83% for mavrilimumab and 50% for placebo recipients (p=0.0038). Adverse events occurred in 78.6% (n=33) of mavrilimumab and 89.3% (n=25) of placebo recipients. No deaths or vision loss occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Mavrilimumab plus 26 weeks of prednisone was superior to placebo plus 26 weeks of prednisone for time to flare by week 26 and sustained remission in patients with giant cell arteritis. Longer treatment is needed to determine response durability and quantify the glucocorticoid-sparing potential of mavrilimumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03827018, Europe (EUdraCT number: 2018-001003-36), and Australia (CT-2018-CTN-01 865-1)