Human Resources: Key to Competitive Advantage

[Excerpt] As difficult as it may be and as fuzzy as it may turn out, we all must invest in an attempt to peer into the future to discern what implications it has for our human resources. It is not a precise effort, and it certainly can be challenged from many quarters; however, it is not only noble, but may prove to be extremely worthwhile for a competitive firm. As with almost every organization activity, the competitive world makes a paradigm shift inevitable for the human resource function. Understanding the nature of that shift and how to implement meaningful change are the fundamental questions for us all

Jurisdiction—A Methodological Analysis: Implications for Presence and Domicile as Jurisdictional Bases—Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 (1977)

A shareholder in Greyhound Corporation, a Delaware corporation, brought a derivative action against corporate officers and directors alleging that certain actions by the defendants in Oregon had caused substantial harm to the corporation. The suit was initiated in a Delaware state court with jurisdiction based only on the statutory presence of property in that state. The defendants contested this attempt to assert quasi in rem jurisdiction on due process and other grounds, but their arguments were rejected by the trial court and the Delaware Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court reversed. Held: The minimum contacts test developed in International Shoe Co. v. Washington must be applied to evaluate the assertion of jurisdiction by a state court; the contacts in this case were insufficient to sustain the court\u27s jurisdiction. Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 (1977)

Optical properties of cesium tetracyanoquinodimethanide, Cs2(TCNQ)3

Journal ArticleRoom-temperature polarized reflectance measurements have been made on cesium tetracyanoquinodimethanide, Cs2(TCNQI3, over the frequency range between the far infrared and the near ultraviolet. The optical properties of the compound were obtained by Kramers-Kronig analysis. These properties are dominated by vibrational features at low frequencies and by electronic excitations at high frequencies. The observed vibrational features include ordinary intramolecular modes and "anomalous" infrared activity of the totally symmetric vibrations

Occurrence of Corbicula manilensis Phillipi in the Lower Minnesota River

On March 2, 1978, several empty shells of the fresh water clam, Corbicula manilensis Phillipi, were collected in the Minnesota River near the Blackdog electric generating plant in Burnsville, Minnesota. Since this Asiatic species was first observed in America in 1935, it has spread into all major river systems of North America. Its northernly extension in the Mississippi River system was, however, thought to end in northeast Iowa and to exclude Minnesota. Occurrence of this species is a potential liability because it often exerts a disruptive influence in the community that it invades

The Farcical Samaritan\u27s Dilemma

“[T]he hypothesis is that modern man has become incapable of making the choices that are required to prevent his exploitation by predators of his own species[.]” This article explores one of the foundational pillar theories of Law and Economics and specifically Public Choice Theory as espoused by Nobel Laureate James M. Buchanan: the “Samaritan’s Dilemma.” Using the Biblical parable of the Good Samaritan, Buchanan imagines a “dilemma” faced by the Good Samaritan when encountering a beaten and bloodied man left to die on the road to Jericho. Using Game Theory, Buchanan constructs a moral quandary that the man from Samaria must necessarily resolve within himself in deciding ultimately whether to lend aid to the beaten man left to die. Law and Economics, born in the twentieth century, theoretically establishes “efficiency” as its baseline. In evaluating the law from this efficiency perspective, neoclassical Law and Economics economists’ primary hypothesis is that individuals are rational and respond to incentives in a rational fashion. Law and Economics is built on the fundamental belief that markets, particularly free markets, are “more efficient than courts.” Undergirding this theorizing is the presumption that incentives are the primary motivators of individual behavior; how individuals respond to incentives provides a laser-like focus for Law and Economics. If human actors are “rational and respond to incentives” in a rational manner, then how rationality is defined becomes important for Law and Economics hypothesizing. Bottom line rationality for the Law and Economics economist is that individuals are motivated by self interest and that the rational reaction to an incentive will be to act in a self-interested, wealth-maximizing way. Put simply, a Law and Economics economist would consider a legal situation efficient where rights are allocated “to the party who is willing to pay the most for [them].” Conversely, when an incentive generates an action that results in a penalty, individuals will perform that action less to avoid the penalty. Law and Economics employs Game Theory to mathematically predict how individuals will react in given scenarios based on incentives provided and rationalities defined. In determining mathematically and logically actions that “players” should take to secure the best outcomes for themselves in a wide array of “games,” Game Theory considers itself the “science of strategy.” Perhaps the greatest overriding consideration when employing Game Theory is the interdependence of all choices employed by all players/participants. Or, stated another way, the ultimate outcome for each participant is dependent on the choices or strategies of all participants, requiring players to think about their own strategies while considering the strategies of all other players in coming to their own conclusions. Working through strategies to likely predicted outcomes, based on rational reaction to incentives, is the game or puzzle in Game Theory. With that brief introduction to Law and Economics and Game Theory, this article begins by reconstructing the Biblical parable of the Good Samaritan. Next, the article will provide a fundamental description of the Samaritan’s Dilemma, as espoused by Public Choice economist James Buchanan, explaining how Buchanan’s theory turns the Christian parable upon its head. Next, the article will describe the reasons that the Samaritan’s Dilemma is a farce – a theory best left conceptualized rather than instrumentalized. In describing the farcical Samaritan’s Dilemma, the article will focus on racial capitalism and its historical evolution as a means of understanding the hollow siren’s call of this concocted “Dilemma.” Finally, the article will introduce the reasons that the Samaritan’s Dilemma together with much of law and economics theorizing is intellectually bankrupt. Thereafter, the article will call for a deeper intellectual critique of Law and Economics than has been marshaled to date

Toward a Socially Just Peace in the War on Drugs?: The Illinois Cannabis Social-Equity Program

Laudably, when Illinois legalized the recreational use of cannabis, it also sought to repair the damage wrought by the War on Drugs (WOD)through its social-equity initiatives. That harm included excessive and disproportionate incarceration in communities of color, over-policing within those communities, and all of the social and economic harms implicit in those realities. This harm necessarily creates intergenerational harm, as parents and children lose necessary pillars of support. Moreover, compelling evidence suggests that the progenitors of the WOD in-tended this harm. Measured against this historic social injustice, the social equity efforts in Illinois fail to secure a material unwinding of the WOD harms. Illinois needs a broader approach to ending the War on Drugs beyond cannabis. Treatment should displace criminalization for narcotics. Expungements should become automatic and more widely available. The state should immediately issue more social-equity licenses in affected communities. Investment of revenues from cannabis and other decriminalized drugs in affected communities should continue

Mission at Mubasi - A Simulation for Leadership Development

The United States Army is investing in simulations as a way of providing practice for leader decision making. Such simulations, grounded in lessons learned from deployment experienced leaders, place less experienced and more junior leaders in challenging situations they might soon be confronted with. And given increased demands on the Army to become more efficient, while maintaining acceptable levels of mission readiness, simulations offer a cost effective complement to live field training. So too, the design parameters of such a simulation can be made to reinforce specific behavior responses which teach leaders known theory and application of effective (and ineffective) decision making. With this in mind, the Center for Army Leadership (CAL) determined that decision-making was of critical importance. Specifically, the following aspects of decision-making were viewed as particularly important for today's Army leaders: 1) Decision dilemmas, in the form of equally appealing or equally unappealing choices, such that there is no clear "right" or "wrong" choice 2) Making decisions with incomplete or ambiguous information, and 3) Predicting and experiencing second- and third-order consequences of decisions. It is decision making in such a setting or environment that Army leaders are increasingly confronted with given the full spectrum of military operations they must be prepared for. This paper details the approach and development of this decision making simulation