2,457 research outputs found
Natural hazards and critical public participation - A report of the ESRC Critical Public Engagement seminar, 10 June 2010, University of East Anglia
Participation, power and sustainable energy futures - A report of the ESRC Critical Public Engagement seminar, 26 October 2010, SPRU, University of Sussex
Sustainable participation? Mapping out and reflecting on the field of public dialogue on science and technology - Summary Report
Sustainable Participation? Mapping out and reflecting on the field of public dialogue on science and technology
The field of public participation in issues relating to science, technology and the environment is booming. To date much effort has gone into developing new participatory approaches and their evaluation, while most of what we know comes from individual case studies of engagement. This report builds on one of the first ever studies of public participation experts, their networks, roles and relations, to present a broader analysis of the UK public dialogue field as a whole. It draws on a recent project that involved 21 of the UK’s leading thinkers, practitioners, and policy makers in this area reflecting on the following critical questions. • What is the nature of participatory governance networks and the roles and relations of different actors within them? • Who counts as an expert on public participation and how are these meanings changing over time? • What are the implications of increasing institutionalisation, commercialisation and professionalisation of public dialogue? • To what extent are UK science and policy institutions learning about and learning from public dialogue? Taken together, these insights indicate that the field of public dialogue on science and technology has reached a critical moment and highlight a series of challenges and recommendations for its future sustainability
Organizations in the making: Learning and intervening at the science-policy interface
This paper synthesizes recent insights from geography, science and technology studies and related disciplines concerning organizations and organizational learning at the science-policy interface. The paper argues that organizations do not exist and evolve in isolation, but are co-produced through networked connections to other spaces, bodies and practices. Furthermore, organizations should not be studied as stable entities, but are constantly in-the-making. This co-productionist perspective on organizations and organizing has implications for how geographers theorize, study and intervene in organizations at the science-policy interface with respect to encouraging learning and change and in the roles we adopt within and around such organizations
Democracy, citizenship and anticipatory governance of science and technology - A report of the ESRC Critical Public Engagement seminar, 15 December 2009, Institute of Hazard, Risk & Resilience, Durham University
The Future of Science Governance: A review of public concerns, governance and institutional response
- …