71 research outputs found
Critical conditions and breakup of non-squashed microconfined droplets: Effects of fluid viscoelasticity
Droplet breakup in systems with either a viscoelastic matrix or a viscoelastic droplet is studied microscopically in bulk and confined shear flow, using a parallel plate counter rotating shear flow cell. The ratio of droplet diameter to gap spacing is systematically varied between 0.1 and 0.85. In bulk shear flow, the effects of matrix and droplet viscoelasticity on the critical capillary number for breakup are very moderate under the studied conditions. However, in confined conditions a profoundly different behaviour is observed: the critical capillary numbers of a viscoelastic droplet are similar to those of a Newtonian droplet, whereas matrix viscoelasticity causes breakup at a much lower capillary number. The critical capillary numbers are compared with the predictions of a phenomenological model by Minale et al. (Langmuir 26:126β132, 2010); the model results are in qualitative disagreement with the experimental data. It is also found that the critical dimensionless droplet length, the critical capillary number, and the dimensionless droplet length at breakup show a similar dependency on confinement ratio. As a result, confined droplets in a viscoelastic matrix have a smaller dimensionless length at breakup than droplets in a Newtonian matrix, which affects the breakup mode. Whereas confined droplets in a Newtonian matrix can break up into multiple parts, only two daughter droplets are obtained after breakup in a viscoelastic matrix, up to very large confinement ratios
Critical conditions for droplet break-up: effects of confinement and component viscoelasticity
Droplet relaxation in blends with one viscoelastic component : bulk and confined conditions
Using a counter rotating parallel plate shear flow cell, the shape relaxation of deformed droplets in a quiescent matrix is studied microscopically. Both the effects of geometrical confinement and component viscoelasticity are systematically explored at viscosity ratios of 0.45 and 1.5. The flow conditions are varied from a rather low to a nearly critical Ca number. Under all conditions investigated, viscoelasticity of the droplet phase has no influence on shape relaxation, whereas matrix viscoelasticity and geometrical confinement result in a slower droplet retraction. Up to high confinement ratios, the relaxation curves for ellipsoidal droplets can be superposed onto a master curve. Confined droplets with a sigmoidal shape relax in two stages: the first consists of a shape change to an ellipsoid with a limited amount of retraction, and the second is the retraction of this ellipsoid. The latter stage can be described by means of one single relaxation time that can be obtained from the relaxation of initially ellipsoidal droplets. The experimental results are compared to the predictions of a recently published phenomenological model for droplet dynamics in confined systems with viscoelastic components (Minale et al., Langmuir 26:126β132, 2010). However, whereas the model predicts additive effects of geometrical confinement and component viscoelasticity, the experimental data reveal more complex interactions
Critical conditions for droplet break-up: effects of confinement and component viscoelasticity
Relaxation of fibrils in blends with one viscoelastic component: Bulk and confined conditions
Using a counter rotating parallel plate shear flow cell, shape relaxation of fibrils in a quiescent matrix is studied microscopically. Both the effects of geometrical confinement and component viscoelasticity are systematically explored. By applying a supercritical shear flow for varying amounts of time, droplets with a wide range of initial elongation ratios have been generated. The shape relaxation of these elongated droplets occurs in two stages; the first one consists of shape changes and retraction from a fibril to an ellipsoid, the second one is the retraction of this ellipsoid to a sphere. During both stages of the relaxation process, droplet viscoelasticity has no influence on the relaxation, whereas matrix viscoelasticity and geometrical confinement result in a slower retraction. However, the effect of confinement on the shape relaxation during the first stage of the relaxation process is less pronounced than its influence on the retraction of ellipsoidal droplets. The relaxation time of the second stage of the relaxation corresponds to the relaxation time of initially ellipsoidal droplets. Finally, for confinement ratios up to 0.75 and Deborah numbers around 1, no effect of confinement and component viscoelasticity on the critical initial elongation ratio for breakup during relaxation has been foun
- β¦