67 research outputs found
Integrated forecasting models of pesticide concentrations and environmental monitoring campaigns
By integrating agri-environmental databases, mathematical models and
geographic information systems, maps showing the potential vulnerability of soils to the
leaching of plant protection products can be generated. However, these forecasts may
not be subsequently corroborated by monitoring data. Here we present a case study
based on glyphosate in Lombardy (Italy) and triazine herbicides in the Autonomous
Community of Valencia (Spain). Glyphosate was found in the groundwater of Lombardy,
despite modeling results clearly indicating the non-potential risk of groundwater
contamination. Among the triazine herbicides in Valencia, simazine, although present in
surface waters, was not found in groundwaters, contrary to its expected behavior as a
potential leachate. The discrepancy in the behavior of glyphosate can be explained by
infiltration and point contamination sources, and the absence of simazine by the facility
of its degradation. Our study highlights the importance of integrating monitoring
modeling and mapping approaches to improve knowledge and to obtain quality data.
[Contrib Sci 10:151-160 (2014)
Multi-actor approach and engagement strategy to promote the adoption of best management practices and a sustainable use of pesticides for groundwater quality improvement in hilly vineyards.
The adoption of pesticide mitigation measures and innovation at farm level, are seen as a drivers to reach the sustainable water policy objectives. With the aim to prevent the pesticide pressure of hilly vineyards on groundwater contamination, a stepwise approach in Tidone Valley was applied using different consultation mechanisms and involvement strategies throughout the overall process. Face to face meetings, direct surveys, participatory monitoring and planning of several activities aiming to inform, educate, improve skills, change of individual behaviour or raise awareness, or even initiatives to build institutional trust or support for new investment in innovation are some examples. These activities allowed us to involve key actors of water use and governance (such as farmers, advisors, representatives of drinking water management, farmer's associations, Winemaking cooperatives, local Health Authority), and to have a deeper knowledge of the context agricultural practices, of farmer's knowledge and skills concerning factors influencing water contamination and also to promote the most suitable Best Management Practices aimed at limiting the pesticide occurrence in groundwater. Indeed, the surveys results highlighted that the majority of the farms are small (64% of vineyards10 ha), that most of the farmers (62%) are not aware of the current legislation on water, even if 64% of them declare to participate regularly to training courses for the prevention of water contamination and that there is a low to moderate level of adoption of Best Practices able to prevent contamination by pesticides. At the end of the overall process, it can be stated that the multi-actor approach and engagement strategy adopted were successful in improving attitudes to more sustainable practices. This is supported also by the monitoring data that show in 2019 a decrease by 44% of pesticides occurrences and a fall by 68% of values above EQ
Glyphosate, glufosinate ammonium, and AMPA occurrences and sources in groundwater of hilly vineyards
Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine] and glufosinate ammonium [ammonium dl-homoalanin-4-(methyl) phosphinate] are broad-spectrum, nonselective, post-emergence herbicides extensively used in various applications for weed control in both agricultural and non-crop areas. Aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) is the major degradation product of glyphosate found in plants, water, and soil. Due to glyphosate's presumed low mobility, its monitoring in European water was limited. Recently both glyphosate and AMPA have been detected in several groundwater samples in Europe, U.S, Canada, Argentina, and China. Understanding the sources of these substances in water, especially in groundwater used for drinking, becomes a priority. In the present work the occurrences and the main drives of glyphosate, AMPA, and glufosinate ammonium in the groundwater of hilly vineyards located in the North-West of Italy were evaluated. Groundwater monitoring results showed frequent detection and concentrations above EQSGW for glyphosate and AMPA, while glufosinate ammonium was never detected. More frequent occurrences and higher concentrations were detected in the samples collected from wells located in the farmyards, most of them being used for irrigation and/or preparation of PPPs mixtures. Indeed, AMPA was the only compound detected in one groundwater well used for drinking, at values bellow EQSGw/DWQS. Such monitoring results were not expected as the modelling estimations under local pedoclimatic conditions indicated no risk of leaching to groundwater. However, the modelling performance and output may have been influenced by the non-consideration of important specific processes. Integrating monitoring and modelling results with information concerning the agricultural practices adopted and the wells use and location, possible contamination drivers were identified. These include the non-agricultural use of glyphosate in the farmyard, the point source contamination of wells and the possible transport with the subsurface lateral inflow of water from up-hill vineyard. This study strengthens the position of SETAC EMAG-Pest GW group concerning the necessity of spatial and temporal contextualisation of groundwater monitoring for a better understanding of its contamination drivers by PPPs
Gli insetti, una fonte proteica alternativa per la zootecnia
SOSTENIBILIT\uc0 Ricerca, opportunit\ue0 e criticit\ue0 di una nuova tipologia di allevamento. L\u2019aumento globale della richiesta di proteine animali: un problema da affrontar
A PROCESS TO PROVIDE HARMONISED CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF INDICATORS FOR PESTICIDE-RISK REDUCTION, WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE SUSTAINABLE-USE DIRECTIVE
BACKGROUND: In October 2009, the Council of the European Union adopted the Directive on Sustainable Use of
Pesticides (EU 128/2009/EC). This Directive establishes a framework to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides by
reducing the risk and impacts of pesticide use on both human health and the environment, and promoting the use of
integrated pest management and of alternative approaches or techniques. These risks thus need to be assessed using
appropriate risk indicators. The OPERA Research Centre organised an expert working group and has had several
consultations with stakeholders in order to identify a common way of thinking in evaluating and identifying the factors
that should be considered in selecting each indicator.
RESULTS: Harmonised criteria has been suggested to allow the selection of the most appropriate indicators focusing
on the use phase of pesticide as requested by the Directive on Sustainable Use.
CONCLUSION: The proposed methodology has led to a sharing perspectives and knowledge between the experts
involved, and some principles have been identified to help national regulatory institutions to estimate general trends in
pesticide-risk reduction
Share knowledge for a Sustainable Management of the Agricultural Productions: an Italian experience in the Sustainable Use Directive perspective
Share knowledge for a Sustainable Management of the Agricultural Productions: an Italian experience in the Sustainable Use Directive perspectiv
Pi\uf9 responsabilit\ue0 nella difesa delle colture
La scelta della strategia impone di conoscere le conseguenze su salute, ambiente e organismi non bersagli
rischi da agenti chimici nelle coltivazioni in serra
Valutazione del rischio uso agrofarmaci per gli operatori in serr
- …