The NAME trial:a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients

A nationwide observational study in heavily pretreated metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients

Current guidelines in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) recommend the combination of trastuzumab and a chemotherapeutic agent for 3rd line or later treatments. This study aims to describe the treatment of HER2-positive mBC in 3rd line or later after previous treatment with T-DM1 for mBC in a real-world setting. This observational population-based study included all women diagnosed with HER2-positive mBC in Denmark, previously treated with T-DM1 in the metastatic setting. Patients were included on the date of progression leading to initiation of 3rd line treatment if the patient had received T-DM1 in 1st or 2nd line. If the patient received T-DM1 in 3rd line or later the inclusion was based on the date of progression on T-DM1. The primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The study included 272 women with a mean age of 59 (27–86) and a median of 3 (2–11) treatment lines prior to inclusion. At index, all patients had received T-DM1 and 167 (62%) patients had received pertuzumab in the metastatic setting. During follow-up 183 patients received chemotherapy. Of these patients, 120 received chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab, 50 received chemotherapy combined with other HER2-targeted therapy, and 13 received chemotherapy as monotherapy. The remaining 89 patients received either HER2-targeted monotherapy (41), endocrine therapy (31), experimental treatment (10), or no treatment (7). Median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.8–6.5) and median OS was 18.5 months (95% CI, 16.2–21.3). In this real-world study, we found that patients were treated with a wide variety of anti-cancer agents with modest efficacy. However, patients in this study did not have access to newer therapies like tucatinib and T-DXd.</p

A combretastatin-mediated decrease in neutrophil concentration in peripheral blood and the impact on the anti-tumor activity of this drug in two different murine tumor models.

The vascular disrupting agent combretastatin A-4 disodium phosphate (CA4P) induces fluctuations in peripheral blood neutrophil concentration. Because neutrophils have the potential to induce both vascular damage and angiogenesis we analyzed neutrophil involvement in the anti-tumoral effects of CA4P in C3H mammary carcinomas in CDF1 mice and in SCCVII squamous cell carcinomas in C3H/HeN mice. Flow cytometry analyses of peripheral blood before and up to 144 h after CA4P administration (25 and 250 mg/kg) revealed a decrease 1 h after treatment, followed by an early (3-6 h) and a late (>72 h) increase in the granulocyte concentration. We suggest that the early increase (3-6 h) in granulocyte concentration was caused by the initial decrease at 1 h and found that the late increase was associated with tumor size, and hence independent of CA4P. No alterations in neutrophil infiltration into the C3H tumor after CA4P treatment (25 and 250 mg/kg) were found. Correspondingly, neutrophil depletion in vivo, using an anti-neutrophil antibody, followed by CA4P treatment (25 mg/kg) did not increase the necrotic fraction in C3H tumors significantly. However, by increasing the CA4P dose to 250 mg/kg we found a significant increase of 359% in necrotic fraction when compared to neutrophil-depleted mice; in mice with no neutrophil depletion CA4P induced an 89% change indicating that the presence of neutrophils reduced the effect of CA4P. In contrast, neither CA4P nor 1A8 affected the necrotic fraction in the SCCVII tumors significantly. Hence, we suggest that the initial decrease in granulocyte concentration was caused by non-tumor-specific recruitment of neutrophils and that neutrophils may attenuate CA4P-mediated anti-tumor effect in some tumor models