Report to the Washington State Board of Natural Resources from the Independent Review Committee

1 volume (various pagings) : illustrations, maps ; 28 cmhttps://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies/1055/thumbnail.jp

Report to the Washington State Board of Natural Resources from the Independent Review Committee

1 volume (various pagings) : illustrations, maps ; 28 cmhttps://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies/1055/thumbnail.jp

AGENDA: The Law of International Water Courses: The United Nations International Law Commission\u27s Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses

Colloquium organizers, committee members and/or moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors Daniel Magraw, James N. Corbridge, Jr. and Lawrence J. MacDonnell (Director, Natural Resources Law Center). The United Nations International Law Commission has drafted new rules on the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. University of Colorado Law Professor Daniel Magraw has organized a colloquium to review these draft rules on October 18, 1991, sponsored jointly by the Panel on State Responsibility of the American Society of International Law, the University of Colorado School of Law, and the International Environmental Law Committee of the ABA\u27s Section of International Law and Practice

AGENDA: Community-Owned Forests: Possibilities, Experiences, and Lessons Learned

Community-owned forests may be the answer for some U.S. communities now confronting unanticipated and unwanted large scale land use changes – changes that could irrevocably change their local landscapes and quality of life. Across the country, millions of acres of private forest lands are being put up for sale as the forest products companies who own them find other, cheaper sources of supply. If, as is likely, purchasers divide and convert the forests to residential or other development uses, nearby communities face losing the critical economic, environmental, recreational, social, cultural, and aesthetic values and benefits those forests have traditionally provided. Affected localities are urgently seeking alternatives, such as government acquisition of the land and its addition to existing state or federal forests, identification of private purchasers who will maintain forest uses and/or limit development intensity, the purchase of development rights on the properties, or negotiation of conservation easements. Increasingly, however, forward thinking communities are pursuing a more exciting – and challenging – option: acquiring the lands to manage them as community forests, now and for the future. Community-owned and –managed forests can be found around the world, and are not a new concept. Some New England “town forests,” for instance were established nearly a century ago. The recent surge of interest in community forests in the U.S., however is unprecedented. In response, a three-day national conference was held in Missoula, Montana, in 2005, to bring together practitioners from around the country to explore issues, options, and experiences in community forest establishment, governance, management, and use. Through presentations, group discussions, poster sessions, and field tours to proposed community forests in the nearby Blackfoot and Swan Valleys the conference addressed: Understanding the issues Current and historic community forests in North America Corporate forest land divestiture – issues and opportunities for companies and communities Exploring the possibilities Assessing local readiness and capacity to establish a community forest Forest land acquisition and financing; options, tools, and techniques Costs and revenues: doing the calculations, making the choices Making it work Developing and sustaining a collective vision for a community forest Forest management models that have worked – and some that haven’t Building needed social, financial, institutional, and technical capacity Community learning: multiparty monitoring and participatory science Facing the challenges Defining the “community” Dealing with issues of property, tenure, responsibility, risk, and governance Managing a forest for multiple public and private values Ensuring effective community leadership, investment, and control over the long term The missing pieces: needed new or revised laws, policies, and financing too

Cytoarchitecture of mouse and human subventricular zone in developing cerebral neocortex

During cerebral neocortical development, excitatory neurons are generated from radial glial cells in the ventricular zone (VZ) or from secondary progenitor cells in the subventricular zone (SVZ); these neurons then migrate toward the pial surface. We have observed that post-mitotic neurons generated directly in the VZ accumulated just above the VZ with a multipolar morphology, while secondary progenitor cells having a long ascending process left the VZ faster than the post-mitotic neurons. Recent observations of human developing neocortex have revealed the existence of radial glia-like progenitors (oRG cells) in the SVZ. This type of progenitor was first thought to be human specific; however, similar cells have also been found in mouse neocortex, and the morphology of these cells resembled that of some of the secondary progenitor cells that we had previously observed, suggesting the existence of a common architecture for the developing neocortex among mammals. In this review, we discuss the nature of the SVZ and its similarities and differences between humans and mice

Choline Availability During Embryonic Development Alters Progenitor Cell Mitosis in Developing Mouse Hippocampus

Previously, we reported that dietary choline influences development of the hippocampus in fetal rat brain. It is important to know whether similar effects of choline occur in developing fetal mouse brain because interesting new experimental approaches are now available using several transgenic mouse models. Timed-pregnant mice were fed choline-supplemented (CS), control (CT) or choline-deficient (CD) AIN-76 diet from embryonic day 12 to 17 (E12–17). Fetuses from CD dams had diminished concentrations of phosphocholine and phosphatidylcholine in their brains compared with CT or CS fetuses (P < 0.05). When we analyzed fetal hippocampus on day E17 for cells with mitotic phase–specific expression of phosphorylated histone H3, we detected fewer labeled cells at the ventricular surface of the ventricular zone in the CD group (14.8 ± 1.9) compared with the CT (30.7 ± 1.9) or CS (36.6 ± 2.6) group (P < 0.05). At the same time, we detected more apoptotic cells in E17 hippocampus using morphology in the CD group (11.8 ± 1.4) than in CT (5.6 ± 0.6) or CS (4.2 ± 0.7) group (P < 0.05). This was confirmed using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-digoxigenin anti-digoxigenin fluorescein conjugate antibody nick end-labeling (TUNEL) and activated caspase-3 immunoreactivity. We conclude that the dietary availability of choline to the mouse dam influences progenitor cell proliferation and apoptosis in the fetal brain. J. Nutr. 133: 3614–3618, 2003

Two Types of Planning in Neighborhoods

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68338/2/10.1177_0739456X8400300209.pd

Progress of medieval studies in the United States of America.

No. 6-10 include the report of the Mediaeval Academy of America.No. 6-10 include the report of the Mediaeval Academy of America.Mode of access: Internet

AGENDA: The Law of International Water Courses: The United Nations International Law Commission\u27s Draft Rules on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses

Colloquium organizers, committee members and/or moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors Daniel Magraw, James N. Corbridge, Jr. and Lawrence J. MacDonnell (Director, Natural Resources Law Center). The United Nations International Law Commission has drafted new rules on the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. University of Colorado Law Professor Daniel Magraw has organized a colloquium to review these draft rules on October 18, 1991, sponsored jointly by the Panel on State Responsibility of the American Society of International Law, the University of Colorado School of Law, and the International Environmental Law Committee of the ABA\u27s Section of International Law and Practice