35 research outputs found
A Tale of Two Tails
We present a three-player game in which a proposer makes a suggestion on how to split 0. Our results show a decision-maker whose main concern is to reduce the inequality between proposer and responder and who, in order to do so, is willing to reject both selfish and generous offers.This pattern of rejections is robust through a series of treatments which include changing the "flat-fee" payoff of the decision-maker, introducing a monetary cost for the decision-maker in case the offer ends up in a rejection, or letting a computer replace the proposer to randomly make the splitting suggestion between proposer and responder. Further, through these different treatments we are able to show that decision- makers ignore the intentions behind the proposers suggestions, as well as ignoring their own relative payoffs, two surprising results given the existing literature
Non-Standard Errors
In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty: Non-standard errors (NSEs). We study NSEs by letting 164 teams test the same hypotheses on the same data. NSEs turn out to be sizable, but smaller for better reproducible or higher rated research. Adding peer-review stages reduces NSEs. We further find that this type of uncertainty is underestimated by participants
Motivated Beliefs, Social Preferences, and Limited Liability in Financial Decision-Making
Using a new experimental design, we compare how subjects form beliefs in an investorclient
setup under varying degrees of liability. Our results re
ect the importance of social
preferences when making investment decisions for others. We show that when investors
have no liability, those with stronger social preferences are more optimistic about the
probability that their investment results in a gain. In other words, we nd that social
preferences appear to be correlated with motivated beliefs. This nding suggests the
existence of cognitive biases in nancial decision-making and supports the recent literature
on the formation of motivated beliefs under limited liability (Barberis, 2015; B enabou and
Tirole, 2016)
Intertemporal consumption and debt aversion: a replication and extension
We replicate Meissner (Exp Econ 19:281–298, 2016), where debt aversion was reported for the first time in an intertemporal consumption and saving problem. While Meissner (2016) uses a German sample, our participants are US undergraduate students. All of the original study’s main findings replicate with similar effect sizes. Additionally, we extend the original analysis by introducing a new individual index of debt aversion, which we use to compare debt aversion across countries. Interestingly, we find no significant differences in debt aversion between the original German and the new US sample. We then test whether debt aversion correlates with individual characteristics such as gender, cognitive reflection ability, and risk aversion. Overall, this paper confirms the importance of debt aversion in intertemporal consumption and saving problems and validates the approach of Meissner (2016)
a replication and extension
We replicate Meissner (2016) where debt aversion was reported for the first time in an
intertemporal consumption and saving problem. While Meissner (2016) uses a German
sample, our subjects are US undergraduate students. All of the main findings from the
original study replicate, with similar effect sizes. Additionally, we extend the original
analysis by correlating a new individual index of debt aversion on individual characteristics
such as gender, cognitive ability, and risk aversion. The findings suggest that gender and
risk aversion are not correlated with debt aversion. However, cognitive ability is positively
correlated with debt aversion. Overall, this paper confirms the importance of debt aversion
in intertemporal consumption problems and validates the approach of Meissner (2016)
Intertemporal Consumption and Debt Aversion: A Replication and Extension
We replicate Meissner (2016) where debt aversion was reported for the first time in an intertemporal consumption and saving problem. While Meissner (2016) uses a German sample, our subjects are US undergraduate students. All of the main findings from the original study replicate with similar effect sizes. Additionally, we extend the original analysis by correlating a new individual index of debt aversion on individual characteristics such as gender, cognitive ability, and risk aversion. The findings suggest that gender and risk aversion are not correlated with debt aversion. However, cognitive ability is positively correlated with debt aversion. Overall, this paper confirms the importance of debt aversion in intertemporal consumption problems and validates the approach of Meissner (2016)