Optimization and validation of an analytical method for the quantification of short- and medium-chained chlorinated paraffins in food by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

This work describes the optimization and validation of an analytical method for the quantification of short- and medium-chained chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs and MCCPs, respectively) in a range of food matrices using gas chromatography-electron capture negative ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-ECNI/MS). A dispersive solid phase extraction (dSPE) method was optimized for fish, meat, oil, milk and whole-grain cereal followed by clean-up with concentrated sulfuric acid and acid silica. Fractionation using silica cartridges efficiently removed a number of potentially interfering halogenated compound classes from sample extracts while retaining 96% of ∑SCCPs and 99% of ∑MCCPs. Limits of quantification (LOQs) estimated for food samples ranged from 0.7 to 6.0&nbsp;ng/g wet weight (ww) for ∑SCCPs and 1.3–12&nbsp;ng/g ww for ∑MCCPs. The applicability of the optimized protocol was assessed in each of the described food matrices via repeated analysis (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;3) of samples fortified with SCCP 55.5%Cl and MCCP 57%Cl technical mixtures at two concentration levels and spiked lard samples from a recent European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) interlaboratory study on CPs in food. The EURL’s accuracy criteria was met for both homologue groups in all food matrices with overall accuracy in the range of 76–130% for in-house spiked samples and 57–150% for the EURL lard analysis. Excellent precision was observed for most samples with relative standard deviation (RSD) between replicates (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;3)&nbsp;≤&nbsp;12% for ∑SCCPs and ≤17% for ∑MCCPs in all food matrices analysed. The selection of the internal standard was a significant factor in the accuracy of the method and highlights the strong need for more appropriate isotopically labelled CP&nbsp;standards.</p

Short-term temporal variability of urinary biomarkers of organophosphate flame retardants and plasticizers

Background Exposure to organophosphate flame retardants and plasticizers (PFRs) is commonly estimated by measuring biomarker concentrations in spot urine samples. However, their concentrations in urine can vary greatly over time due to short biological half-lives and variable exposure, potentially leading to exposure misclassification. In this study, we examined the within- and between-individual and within- and between-day variability of PFR metabolites in spot and 24-hour pooled urine samples during five consecutive days. Methods We collected all spot urine samples from 10 healthy adults for 5 days. On one additional day, we collected 24-hour pooled urine samples. Samples were analyzed by solid-phase extraction coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to assess the reproducibility of metabolite concentrations in morning void and spot samples. Results Fair-to-good reproducibility was observed for serial measurements of bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCIPP), 1-hydroxy-2-propyl bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BCIPHIPP), 2-hydroxyethyl bis(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (BBOEHEP) and 2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl diphenyl phosphate (5-HO-EHDPHP) (ICC: 0.396 – 0.599), whereas concentrations of diphenyl phosphate (DPHP) and 2-ethylhexyl phenyl phosphate (EHPHP) were more variable in time (ICC: 0.303 and 0.234). Reproducibility improved significantly when only morning void samples were considered and when concentrations were adjusted for urinary dilution. Collecting 24-hour pooled urine could be a reliable alternative for PFR biomarkers with poor short-term temporal variability. Conclusions The between-day variability was minor compared to variability observed within the same day, which suggests that collecting multiple samples could reduce exposure missclassification. Differences in the observed between- and within-individual variance were compound specific and related to both the nature of the exposure (e.g., diet vs other exposure routes, multiple sources) and the individual toxicokinetic properties of the investigated PFRs

Short-term temporal variability of urinary biomarkers of organophosphate flame retardants and plasticizers

Background Exposure to organophosphate flame retardants and plasticizers (PFRs) is commonly estimated by measuring biomarker concentrations in spot urine samples. However, their concentrations in urine can vary greatly over time due to short biological half-lives and variable exposure, potentially leading to exposure misclassification. In this study, we examined the within- and between-individual and within- and between-day variability of PFR metabolites in spot and 24-hour pooled urine samples during five consecutive days. Methods We collected all spot urine samples from 10 healthy adults for 5 days. On one additional day, we collected 24-hour pooled urine samples. Samples were analyzed by solid-phase extraction coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to assess the reproducibility of metabolite concentrations in morning void and spot samples. Results Fair-to-good reproducibility was observed for serial measurements of bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCIPP), 1-hydroxy-2-propyl bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BCIPHIPP), 2-hydroxyethyl bis(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (BBOEHEP) and 2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl diphenyl phosphate (5-HO-EHDPHP) (ICC: 0.396 – 0.599), whereas concentrations of diphenyl phosphate (DPHP) and 2-ethylhexyl phenyl phosphate (EHPHP) were more variable in time (ICC: 0.303 and 0.234). Reproducibility improved significantly when only morning void samples were considered and when concentrations were adjusted for urinary dilution. Collecting 24-hour pooled urine could be a reliable alternative for PFR biomarkers with poor short-term temporal variability. Conclusions The between-day variability was minor compared to variability observed within the same day, which suggests that collecting multiple samples could reduce exposure missclassification. Differences in the observed between- and within-individual variance were compound specific and related to both the nature of the exposure (e.g., diet vs other exposure routes, multiple sources) and the individual toxicokinetic properties of the investigated PFRs