Calsequestrin as a risk factor in Graves’ hyperthyroidism and Graves’ ophthalmopathy patients

Background: The pathogenesis of Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO), Graves’ hyperthyroidism (GH) and the mechanisms for its link to thyroid autoimmunity are poorly understood. Our research focuses on the role of the skeletal muscle calcium binding protein calsequestrin (CASQ1) in thyroid. We measured the concentration of the CASQ1 protein correlating levels with parameters of the eye signs, CASQ1 antibody levels and CASQ1 gene polymorphism rs3838284. Methods: CASQ1 protein was measured by quantitative Western Blotting. The protein concentrations were expressed as pmol/mg total protein by reference to CASQ1 standards. Results: Western blot analysis showed the presence of two forms of CASQ1 in the thyroid. The mean concentration of CASQ1 protein was significantly reduced in patients with Graves’ disease, compared to thyroid from control subjects with multi-nodular goitre or thyroid cancer. Although in patients with GO it was lower than that, compared with patients with GH this difference was not significant. Reduced CASQ1 in Graves’ thyroid correlated with the homozygous genotype of the rs3838284 CASQ1 polymorphism. Conclusions: Decreased CASQ1 in the thyroid of patients with Graves’ disease compared to thyroid from control subjects is not explained but may reflect consumption of the protein during an autoimmune reaction against CASQ1 in the thyroid

Physicians' and nurses' opinions on selective decontamination of the digestive tract and selective oropharyngeal decontamination: a survey

Contains fulltext : 89741.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)INTRODUCTION: Use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) in intensive care patients has been controversial for years. Through regular questionnaires we determined expectations concerning SDD (effectiveness) and experience with SDD and SOD (workload and patient friendliness), as perceived by nurses and physicians. METHODS: A survey was embedded in a group-randomized, controlled, cross-over multicenter study in the Netherlands in which, during three 6-month periods, SDD, SOD or standard care was used in random order. At the end of each study period, all nurses and physicians from participating intensive care units received study questionnaires. RESULTS: In all, 1024 (71%) of 1450 questionnaires were returned by nurses and 253 (82%) of 307 by physicians. Expectations that SDD improved patient outcome increased from 71% and 77% of respondents after the first two study periods to 82% at the end of the study (P = 0.004), with comparable trends among nurses and physicians. Nurses considered SDD to impose a higher workload (median 5.0, on a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high)) than SOD (median 4.0) and standard care (median 2.0). Both SDD and SOD were considered less patient friendly than standard care (medians 4.0, 4.0 and 6.0, respectively). According to physicians, SDD had a higher workload (median 5.5) than SOD (median 5.0), which in turn was higher than standard care (median 2.5). Furthermore, physicians graded patient friendliness of standard care (median 8.0) higher than that of SDD and SOD (both median 6.0). CONCLUSIONS: Although perceived effectiveness of SDD increased as the trial proceeded, both among physicians and nurses, SOD and SDD were, as compared to standard care, considered to increase workload and to reduce patient friendliness. Therefore, education about the importance of oral care and on the effects of SDD and SOD on patient outcomes will be important when implementing these strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN35176830

The silence of patients with end-stage COPD:A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience poor quality of life and considerable problems in daily life. However, as they often do not actively express a wish for help, they do not get the help they need. AIM: To gain insight into why patients with end-stage COPD tend not to express a wish for help. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Outpatient clinics of four hospitals and one centre specialising in asthma and COPD in the Netherlands. METHOD: Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients with end-stage COPD. RESULTS: To express a wish for help, patients should regard their limitations as abnormal and should realise that there are possibilities to improve their situation. However, this was not the case with the patients interviewed. They appeared to consider themselves ill at a time of acute exacerbation of their illness, but regarded their everyday life as normal. In addition, patients lived with the assumption that, as their lungs were damaged beyond repair, they could not get help. CONCLUSION: Patients with end-stage COPD do not actively express a wish for help because they do not consider their limitations to be abnormal and because they do not realise that there are possibilities to improve their situation. These results suggest that care in this stage of the disease should focus on improving daily life instead of just aiming to improve the functioning of the lungs. Professionals in health care should actively explore what kind of practical help these patients might welcome in keeping up their daily activities. Future research should focus on studying whether such an approach applies to the needs of patients with end-stage COP

The added value of assessing the 'most troublesome' symptom among patients with cancer in the palliative phase.

Contains fulltext : 53646.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)OBJECTIVE: In this study among patients with cancer in the palliative phase, we analysed whether assessing the symptom, which is causing the most trouble in the patient's every day life ('most troublesome' symptom) had added value apart from the presence and severity of symptoms, which are most commonly assessed in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with cancer (lung, gastro-intestinal, breast cancer) in the palliative phase from two non-academic hospitals were included in the study. Using the Symptom Monitor tool, 10 physical symptoms were assessed with regard to presence and severity. The Symptom Monitor has an extra added item indicating as the 'most troublesome' symptom. This item was monitored to determine whether it had added value apart from the presence of symptoms and 'most severe' symptom. The severity score on the indicated 'most troublesome' symptom was subtracted from the severity score of the 'most severe' symptom. The generated delta score of 0 indicated no added value, whereas a score of one or more indicated that the 'most troublesome' symptom would have been missed if not specifically asked for by the physician, because its severity was lower that the 'most severe' symptom. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six patients reported 590 symptoms to be present. In total, 227 symptoms were reported as 'most severe' symptom (n = 138 patients). Among these, fatigue (n = 52) and pain (n = 24) were reported most frequently as 'most severe' symptom. In total, 134 patients indicated a symptom as 'most troublesome'. Fatigue (n = 33; 25%) and pain (n = 22; 16%) were also indicated by most of these patients as the 'most troublesome' symptom. One hundred and fifty-two comparisons could be made between the 'most severe' and the 'most troublesome' symptom. In 102 (67%) of the comparisons assessing the 'most troublesome' symptom had no added value: the score for 'most severe' symptom did not differ from the score for the 'most troublesome' symptom revealing a delta score of 0. In 23 times (15%) of the 152 comparisons made, the delta score was 1 and in 27 (18%) of the comparisons the delta score was 2 or more indicating that assessing the 'most troublesome' symptom substantially had added value. CONCLUSION: In patients in the palliative phase of their disease, extra attention for the 'most troublesome' symptom is needed. In our study, in almost 1/3 of the cases, this symptom would have been missed the physicians attention if not specifically asked for. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We recommend not only to assess the presence and severity of symptoms, but furthermore to assess the patient's 'most troublesome' symptom in addition

Kan de 'asthma control questionnaire' (ACQ) gebruikt worden om astmapatiënten met en zonder goede symptoomcontrole van elkaar te onderscheiden? Resultaten van een pilotstudie.

Contains fulltext : 69565.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Patient preferences for expectant management vs. surgical evacuation in first-trimester uncomplicated miscarriage.

OBJECTIVE: Expectant and surgical management are widely accepted treatment options in case of a miscarriage. In the absence of differences in complications, the choice between both options can be based on patient preferences. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied treatment preferences for future miscarriages in women with a miscarriage randomized to expectant or surgical treatment or managed according to their own choice. RESULTS: Data from 136 patients were analyzed. Women randomized either to expectant or surgical management opted for the allocated treatment in future in 55 and 74%, respectively. Of the women randomized to expectant management and with a successful spontaneous loss, 71% opted again for this treatment. Women who were managed according to their own treatment choice, held on to their initial treatment preference (expectant vs. surgical management; 84 and 88%, respectively). Preferences after treatment were strong. CONCLUSION: A strong treatment preference should be taken into account in the counseling process. Women without a preference should be well informed on all medical aspects of the two options in order to facilitate informed-shared decision-making