Decoding visemes: improving machine lip-reading

Abstract This thesis is about improving machine lip-reading, that is, the classi�cation of speech from only visual cues of a speaker. Machine lip-reading is a niche research problem in both areas of speech processing and computer vision. Current challenges for machine lip-reading fall into two groups: the content of the video, such as the rate at which a person is speaking or; the parameters of the video recording for example, the video resolution. We begin our work with a literature review to understand the restrictions current technology limits machine lip-reading recognition and conduct an experiment into resolution a�ects. We show that high de�nition video is not needed to successfully lip-read with a computer. The term \viseme" is used in machine lip-reading to represent a visual cue or gesture which corresponds to a subgroup of phonemes where the phonemes are indistinguishable in the visual speech signal. Whilst a viseme is yet to be formally de�ned, we use the common working de�nition `a viseme is a group of phonemes with identical appearance on the lips'. A phoneme is the smallest acoustic unit a human can utter. Because there are more phonemes per viseme, mapping between the units creates a many-to-one relationship. Many mappings have been presented, and we conduct an experiment to determine which mapping produces the most accurate classi�cation. Our results show Lee's [82] is best. Lee's classi�cation also outperforms machine lip-reading systems which use the popular Fisher [48] phonemeto- viseme map. Further to this, we propose three methods of deriving speaker-dependent phonemeto- viseme maps and compare our new approaches to Lee's. Our results show the ii iii sensitivity of phoneme clustering and we use our new knowledge for our �rst suggested augmentation to the conventional lip-reading system. Speaker independence in machine lip-reading classi�cation is another unsolved obstacle. It has been observed, in the visual domain, that classi�ers need training on the test subject to achieve the best classi�cation. Thus machine lip-reading is highly dependent upon the speaker. Speaker independence is the opposite of this, or in other words, is the classi�cation of a speaker not present in the classi�er's training data. We investigate the dependence of phoneme-to-viseme maps between speakers. Our results show there is not a high variability of visual cues, but there is high variability in trajectory between visual cues of an individual speaker with the same ground truth. This implies a dependency upon the number of visemes within each set for each individual. Finally, we investigate how many visemes is the optimum number within a set. We show the phoneme-to-viseme maps in literature rarely have enough visemes and the optimal number, which varies by speaker, ranges from 11 to 35. The last di�culty we address is decoding from visemes back to phonemes and into words. Traditionally this is completed using a language model. The language model unit is either: the same as the classi�er, e.g. visemes or phonemes; or the language model unit is words. In a novel approach we use these optimum range viseme sets within hierarchical training of phoneme labelled classi�ers. This new method of classi�er training demonstrates signi�cant increase in classi�cation with a word language network

Comparing heterogeneous visual gestures for measuring the diversity of visual speech signals

Visual lip gestures observed whilst lipreading have a few working definitions, the most common two are: ‘the visual equivalent of a phoneme’ and ‘phonemes which are indistinguishable on the lips’. To date there is no formal definition, in part because to date we have not established a two-way relationship or mapping between visemes and phonemes. Some evidence suggests that visual speech is highly dependent upon the speaker. So here, we use a phoneme-clustering method to form new phoneme-to-viseme maps for both individual and multiple speakers. We test these phoneme to viseme maps to examine how similarly speakers talk visually and we use signed rank tests to measure the distance between individuals. We conclude that broadly speaking, speakers have the same repertoire of mouth gestures, where they differ is in the use of the gestures