38 research outputs found

    A Deadenylase Assay by Size-Exclusion Chromatography

    Get PDF
    The shortening of the 3′-end poly(A) tail, also called deadenylation, is crucial to the regulation of mRNA processing, transportation, translation and degradation. The deadenylation process is achieved by deadenylases, which specifically catalyze the removal of the poly(A) tail at the 3′-end of eukaryotic mRNAs and release 5′-AMP as the product. To achieve their physiological functions, all deadenylases have numerous binding partners that may regulate their catalytic properties or recruit them into various protein complexes. To study the effects of various partners, it is important to develop new deadenylase assay that can be applied either in vivo or in vitro. In this research, we developed the deadenylase assay by the size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) method. The SEC analysis indicated that the poly(A) or oligo(A) substrate and the product AMP could be successfully separated and quantified. The enzymatic parameters of deadenylase could be obtained by quantifying the AMP generation. When using the commercial poly(A) as the substrate, a biphasic catalytic process was observed, which might correlate to the two distinct states of poly(A) in the commercial samples. Different lots of commercial poly(A) had dissimilar size distributions and were dissimilar in response to the degradation of deadenylase. The deadenylation pattern, processive or distributive, could also be investigated using the SEC assay by monitoring the status of the substrate and the generation kinetics of AMP and A2. The SEC assay was applicable to both simple samples using the purified enzyme and complex enzyme reaction conditions such as using protein mixtures or crude cell extracts as samples. The influence of solutes with absorption at 254 nm could be successfully eliminated by constructing the different SEC profiles

    Inhibition of human poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN) by purine nucleotides: kinetic analysis

    No full text
    Poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN) is a cap-interacting and poly(A)-specific 3'-exoribonuclease that efficiently degrades mRNA poly(A) tails. Based on the enzyme's preference for its natural substrates, we examined the role of purine nucleotides as potent effectors of human PARN activity. We found that all purine nucleotides tested can reduce poly(A) degradation by PARN. Detailed kinetic analysis revealed that RTP nucleotides behave as non-competitive inhibitors while RDP and RMP exhibit competitive inhibition. Mg2+ which is a catalytically important mediator of PARN activity can release inhibition of RTP and RDP but not RMP. Although many strategies have been proposed for the regulation of PARN activity, very little is known about the modulation of PARN activity by small molecule effectors, such as nucleotides. Our data imply that PARN activity can be modulated by purine nucleotides in vitro, providing an additional simple regulatory mechanism

    A Comprehensive Phylogenetic Analysis of Deadenylases

    Get PDF
    Deadenylases catalyze the shortening of the poly(A) tail at the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) 3'-end in eukaryotes. Therefore, these enzymes influence mRNA decay, and constitute a major emerging group of promising anti-cancer pharmacological targets. Herein, we conducted full phylogenetic analyses of the deadenylase homologs in all available genomes in an effort to investigate evolutionary relationships between the deadenylase families and to identify invariant residues, which probably play key roles in the function of deadenylation across species. Our study includes both major Asp-Glu-Asp-Asp (DEDD) and exonuclease-endonuclease-phospatase (EEP) deadenylase superfamilies. The phylogenetic analysis has provided us with important information regarding conserved and invariant deadenylase amino acids across species. Knowledge of the phylogenetic properties and evolution of the domain of deadenylases provides the foundation for the targeted drug design in the pharmaceutical industry and modern exonuclease anti-cancer scientific research

    Modulation of Poly(A)-specific Ribonuclease (PARN): Current Knowledge and Perspectives

    No full text
    Deadenylation is the exoribonucleolytic shortening of eukaryotic poly(A) tails. It is often the first and rate-limiting step for mRNA decay and translational silencing. The process is catalysed by a diversity of deadenylases, which provide robust and flexible means to control mRNA levels and gene expression. Poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN) is a major mammalian deadenylase and the only known to concurrently bind the 5'cap-structure and the 3'poly(A), thus enhancing the degradation rate and amplifying its processivity. PARN is important during oocyte maturation, embryogenesis, early development, DNA damage, and in cell-cycle progression, but also in processes beyond mRNA metabolism, such as the maturation of snoRNAs. The enzyme also participates in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and in the regulation of cytoplasmic polyadenylation. Importantly, PARN is involved in the degradation of several cancer-related genes, while its expression is altered in cancer. Apart from the direct interaction with the cap structure, several strategies regulate PARN activity, such as phosphorylation, interaction with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), and natural nucleotides. Recent studies have focused on the regulation of its activity by synthetic nucleoside analogues with therapeutic potential. In this context, the wide repertoire of RBPs and molecules that regulate PARN activity, together with the established role of deadenylases in miRNA-mediated regulation of mRNA expression, suggest that mRNA turnover is more complex than it was previously thought and PARN holds a key role in this process. In this review, we highlight the importance of PARN during RNA's lifecycle and discuss clinical perspectives of modulating its activity

    “Reappearance” of Helicobacter pylori after eradication: Implications on duodenal ulcer recurrence - A prospective 6 year study

    No full text
    We estimated the rate of Helicobacter pylori “reappearance” and of duodenal ulcer relapse up to 6 years after eradication of H, pylori. Of 220 patients in whom H. pylori was eradicated, 165 were eligible at 12 months to follow-up. Endoscopy was scheduled every 12 months or whenever symptoms appeared. Baseline H. pylori eradication was confirmed by CLO test, histology (hematoxylin-eosin and Giemsa stain), and culture. H. pylori was tested for by the three methods at 12 months and subsequently by 2 methods (CLO, histology) on biopsies obtained from the gastric antrum and body. We reviewed 90 patients after 1 year, 32 after 2 years, 13 after 3 years, 12 after 4 years, 2 after 5 years, and 16 after 6 years (range, 12 to 72 months; average, 25.23 months; patient-years, 347). At 12 months after eradication, 16 of 165 patients (9.7%) were H. pylori positive and 5 had ulcer relapse, Of 75 patients evaluated at 24 months, 7 (9.3%) were H. pylori positive and 1 (1.3%) had ulcer relapse. At 36 months, 43 patients were seen and 1 (2.3%) was H. pylori positive and had ulcer relapse (2.3%). Thirty, 18, and 16 patients were seen at 48, 60, and 72 months, respectively. None was H. pylori positive and none had ulcer relapse. Overall, 24 H. pylori-positive patients were found, two thirds of them in the first year after eradication. In 7 of 24 (29%, 6 smokers), ulcer recurred. None of the H. pylori-negative patients had ulcer relapse. The H, pylori reappearance rate was 7% and the ulcer relapse rate was 2% per patient-year. If the 16 H. pylori-positive patients who were found the first year are considered as recrudescence, then the reinfection rate will be 2.3% per patient-year

    High eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori using a four-drug regimen in patients previously treated unsuccessfully

    No full text
    The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of a new regimen in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (Hp) in patients with duodenal ulcer (DU) who were previously treated unsuccessfully with standard triple therapy (tripotassium dicitratobismuthate [TDB] 120 mg QID, metronidazole 500 mg TID, and tetracycline 500 mg QID) or proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) dual therapy (omeprazole 20 mg BID and amoxicillin 500 mg QID). The study included 133 consecutive patients aged 17 to 83 years with endoscopically diagnosed DU (diameter >5 mm) in whom standard triple therapy or PPI dual therapy had failed to eradicate Hp. A rapid urease (CLO) test was performed on four biopsy specimens at study entry and at least 1 month after the end of treatment to confirm Hp colonization and eradication, respectively. Patients were considered to be Hp positive if any CLO test was positive within 2 hours, and Hp was considered to be eradicated if all CLO tests were still negative after 24 hours. In 31 randomly selected patients, Hp eradication was confirmed histologically as well. Patients were given omeprazole 60 mg/d (20 mg in the morning and 40 mg in the evening) plus amoxicillin 500 mg QID for 10 days and subsequently were given metronidazole 500 mg TID for 10 days plus TDB 120 mg QID for 6 weeks. One hundred and twenty-four patients were followed up; five (4%) withdrew because of side effects (protracted diarrhea, stomatitis, skin rashes). Per-protocol analysis showed Hp eradication in 113 of 119 patients (95%) and ulcer healing in 118 of 119 (99%). Intent-to-treat analysis showed an Hp eradication rate of 85% (113 of 133 patients) and an ulcer healing rate of 89% (118 of 133 patients). In per-therapy analysis, the Hp eradication rate was 91% (113 of 124 patients), and the ulcer healing rate was 95% (118 of 124 patients). Side effects were observed in 39 of 119 patients (33%) and were generally mild. The four-drag regimen used in this study, when given to patients previously treated unsuccessfully with standard triple therapy or PPI dual therapy, was highly effective in eradicating Hp and healing DUs and had no major side effects
    corecore