22 research outputs found

    Assembled Monolayers Depends upon the Roughness of the Substrate and the Orientation of the Terminal Moiety

    Get PDF
    The origin of the odd even effect in properties of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) and/or technologies derived from them is poorly understood. We report that hydrophobicity and, hence, surface wetting of SAMs are dominated by the nature of the substrate (surface roughness and identity) and SAM tilt angle, which influences surface dipoles/orientation of the terminal moiety. We measured static contact angles (theta(s)) made by water droplets on n-alkanethiolate SAMs with an odd (SAM(O)) or even (SAM(E)) number of carbons (average theta(s) range of 105.8-112.1 degrees). When SAMs were fabricated on smooth template-stripped metal (M-TS) surfaces [root-mean-square (rms) roughness = 0.36 +/- 0.01 nm for Au-TS and 0.60 +/- 0.04 nm for Ag-TS], the odd-even effect, characterized by a zigzag oscillation in values of theta(s), was observed. We, however, did not observe the same effect with rougher as-deposited (M-AD) surfaces (rms roughness = 2.27 +/- 0.16 nm for Au-AD and 5.13 +/- 0.22 nm for Ag-AD). The odd-even effect in hydrophobicity inverts when the substrate changes from Au-TS (higher theta(s) for SAM(E) than SAM(O), with average Delta theta(s) (vertical bar n - (n + 1)vertical bar) approximate to 3 degrees) to Ag-TS (higher theta(s) for SAM(O) than SAM(E), with average Delta theta(s) (vertical bar n - (n + 1)vertical bar) approximate to 2 degrees). A comparison of hydrophobicity across Ag-TS and Au-TS showed a statistically significant difference (Student\u27s t test) between SAM(E) (Delta theta(s) (vertical bar Ag evens - Au evens vertical bar) approximate to 5 degrees; P \u3c 0.01) but failed to show statistically significant differences on SAM(O) (Delta theta(s) (vertical bar Ag odds) (- Au odds vertical bar) approximate to 1 degrees; p \u3e 0.1). From these results, we deduce that the roughness of the metal substrate (from comparison of M-AD versus M-TS) and orientation of the terminal -CH2CH3 (by comparing SAM(E) and SAM(O) on Au-TS versus Ag-TS) play major roles in the hydrophobicity and, by extension, general wetting properties of n-alkanethiolate SAMs

    Assembled Monolayers Depends upon the Roughness of the Substrate and the Orientation of the Terminal Moiety

    Get PDF
    The origin of the odd even effect in properties of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) and/or technologies derived from them is poorly understood. We report that hydrophobicity and, hence, surface wetting of SAMs are dominated by the nature of the substrate (surface roughness and identity) and SAM tilt angle, which influences surface dipoles/orientation of the terminal moiety. We measured static contact angles (theta(s)) made by water droplets on n-alkanethiolate SAMs with an odd (SAM(O)) or even (SAM(E)) number of carbons (average theta(s) range of 105.8-112.1 degrees). When SAMs were fabricated on smooth "template-stripped" metal (M-TS) surfaces [root-mean-square (rms) roughness = 0.36 +/- 0.01 nm for Au-TS and 0.60 +/- 0.04 nm for Ag-TS], the odd-even effect, characterized by a zigzag oscillation in values of theta(s), was observed. We, however, did not observe the same effect with rougher "as-deposited" (M-AD) surfaces (rms roughness = 2.27 +/- 0.16 nm for Au-AD and 5.13 +/- 0.22 nm for Ag-AD). The odd-even effect in hydrophobicity inverts when the substrate changes from Au-TS (higher theta(s) for SAM(E) than SAM(O), with average Delta theta(s) (vertical bar n - (n + 1)vertical bar) approximate to 3 degrees) to Ag-TS (higher theta(s) for SAM(O) than SAM(E), with average Delta theta(s) (vertical bar n - (n + 1)vertical bar) approximate to 2 degrees). A comparison of hydrophobicity across Ag-TS and Au-TS showed a statistically significant difference (Student's t test) between SAM(E) (Delta theta(s) (vertical bar Ag evens - Au evens vertical bar) approximate to 5 degrees; P 0.1). From these results, we deduce that the roughness of the metal substrate (from comparison of M-AD versus M-TS) and orientation of the terminal -CH2CH3 (by comparing SAM(E) and SAM(O) on Au-TS versus Ag-TS) play major roles in the hydrophobicity and, by extension, general wetting properties of n-alkanethiolate SAMs.Reprinted with permission from Newcomb, Lucas B., Ian D. Tevis, Manza BJ Atkinson, Symon M. Gathiaka, Rafael E. Luna, and Martin Thuo. "Oddā€“even effect in the hydrophobicity of n-alkanethiolate self-assembled monolayers depends upon the roughness of the substrate and the orientation of the terminal moiety." Langmuir 30, no. 40 (2014): 11985-11992, doi:10.1021/la5032569. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.</p

    1D and 2D metalā€“organic frameworks functionalized with free pyridyl groups

    No full text
    We show that a molecule constructed from an organic solid-state synthesis, namely, rctt-1,3-bis(2-pyridyl)-2,4-bis(4-pyridyl)cyclobutane (ht-2,4 ā€˜-tpcb) upon reaction with Cu(II) and Zn(II) ions gives one- (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) of composition [Cu(hfac)(2)(2,4 ā€˜-tpcb-ht)](infinity) (where: hfac=hexafluoroacetylacetonate) (1) and [Zn(2,4 ā€˜-tpcb-ht)(2)(H2O)(2)](infinity)(2+), (2). Each MOF possesses uncoordinated, or free, 2-pyridyl groups that decorate the walls of each extended structure. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

    Putting Cocrystal Stoichiometry to Work: A Reactive Hydrogen-Bonded ā€œSuperassemblyā€ Enables Nanoscale Enlargement of a Metalā€“Organic Rhomboid via a Solid-State Photocycloaddition

    No full text
    Enlargement of a self-assembled metal organic rhomboid is achieved via the organic solid state. The solid-state synthesis of an elongated organic ligand was achieved by a template directed [2 + 2] photodimerization in a cocrystal. Initial cocrystals obtained of resorcinol template and reactant alkene afforded a 1:2 cocrystal with the alkene in a stacked yet photostable geometry. Cocrystallization performed in the presence of excess template resulted in a 3:2 cocrystal composed of novel discrete 10-component hydrogen-bonded ā€œsuperassembliesā€ wherein the alkenes undergo a head-to head [2 + 2] photodimerization. Isolation and reaction of elongated photoproduct with Cu(II) ions afforded a metal-organic rhomboid of nanoscale dimensions that hosts small molecules in the solid state as guests

    Paramagnetic Ionic Liquids for Measurements of Density Using Magnetic Levitation

    No full text
    Paramagnetic ionic liquids (PILs) provide new capabilities to measurements of density using magnetic levitation (MagLev). In a typical measurement, a diamagnetic object of unknown density is placed in a container containing a PIL. The container is placed between two magnets (typically NdFeB, oriented with like poles facing). The density of the diamagnetic object can be determined by measuring its position in the magnetic field along the vertical axis (levitation height, <i>h</i>), either as an absolute value or relative to internal standards of known density. For density measurements by MagLev, PILs have three advantages over solutions of paramagnetic salts in aqueous or organic solutions: (i) negligible vapor pressures; (ii) low melting points; (iii) high thermal stabilities. In addition, the densities, magnetic susceptibilities, glass transition temperatures, thermal decomposition temperatures, viscosities, and hydrophobicities of PILs can be tuned over broad ranges by choosing the cationā€“anion pair. The low melting points and high thermal stabilities of PILs provide large liquidus windows for density measurements. This paper demonstrates applications and advantages of PILs in density-based analyses using MagLev

    Oddā€“Even Effect in the Hydrophobicity of <i>n</i>ā€‘Alkanethiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers Depends upon the Roughness of the Substrate and the Orientation of the Terminal Moiety

    No full text
    The origin of the oddā€“even effect in properties of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) and/or technologies derived from them is poorly understood. We report that hydrophobicity and, hence, surface wetting of SAMs are dominated by the nature of the substrate (surface roughness and identity) and SAM tilt angle, which influences surface dipoles/orientation of the terminal moiety. We measured static contact angles (Īø<sub>s</sub>) made by water droplets on <i>n</i>-alkanethiolate SAMs with an odd (SAM<sup>O</sup>) or even (SAM<sup>E</sup>) number of carbons (average Īø<sub>s</sub> range of 105.8ā€“112.1Ā°). When SAMs were fabricated on smooth ā€œtemplate-strippedā€ metal (M<sup>TS</sup>) surfaces [root-mean-square (rms) roughness = 0.36 Ā± 0.01 nm for Au<sup>TS</sup> and 0.60 Ā± 0.04 nm for Ag<sup>TS</sup>], the oddā€“even effect, characterized by a zigzag oscillation in values of Īø<sub>s</sub>, was observed. We, however, did not observe the same effect with rougher ā€œas-depositedā€ (M<sup>AD</sup>) surfaces (rms roughness = 2.27 Ā± 0.16 nm for Au<sup>AD</sup> and 5.13 Ā± 0.22 nm for Ag<sup>AD</sup>). The oddā€“even effect in hydrophobicity inverts when the substrate changes from Au<sup>TS</sup> (higher Īø<sub>s</sub> for SAM<sup>E</sup> than SAM<sup>O</sup>, with average Ī”Īø<sub>sĀ |<i>n</i>Ā ā€“Ā (<i>n</i>Ā +Ā 1)|</sub> ā‰ˆ 3Ā°) to Ag<sup>TS</sup> (higher Īø<sub>s</sub> for SAM<sup>O</sup> than SAM<sup>E</sup>, with average Ī”Īø<sub>sĀ |<i>n</i>Ā ā€“Ā (<i>n</i>Ā +Ā 1)|</sub> ā‰ˆ 2Ā°). A comparison of hydrophobicity across Ag<sup>TS</sup> and Au<sup>TS</sup> showed a statistically significant difference (Studentā€™s <i>t</i> test) between SAM<sup>E</sup> (Ī”Īø<sub>sĀ |AgĀ evensĀ ā€“Ā AuĀ evens|</sub> ā‰ˆ 5Ā°; <i>p</i> < 0.01) but failed to show statistically significant differences on SAM<sup>O</sup> (Ī”Īø<sub>sĀ |AgĀ oddsĀ ā€“Ā AuĀ odds|</sub> ā‰ˆ 1Ā°; <i>p</i> > 0.1). From these results, we deduce that the roughness of the metal substrate (from comparison of M<sup>AD</sup> versus M<sup>TS</sup>) and orientation of the terminal āˆ’CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>3</sub> (by comparing SAM<sup>E</sup> and SAM<sup>O</sup> on Au<sup>TS</sup> versus Ag<sup>TS</sup>) play major roles in the hydrophobicity and, by extension, general wetting properties of <i>n</i>-alkanethiolate SAMs
    corecore