Diverse parameters of ambulatory knee moments differ with medial knee osteoarthritis severity and are combinable into a severity index

Objective: To characterize ambulatory knee moments with respect to medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) severity comprehensively and to assess the possibility of developing a severity index combining knee moment parameters.Methods: Nine parameters (peak amplitudes) commonly used to quantify three-dimensional knee moments during walking were analyzed for 98 individuals (58.7 ± 9.2 years old, 1.69 ± 0.09 m, 76.9 ± 14.5 kg, 56% female), corresponding to three medial knee osteoarthritis severity groups: non-osteoarthritis (n = 22), mild osteoarthritis (n = 38) and severe osteoarthritis (n = 38). Multinomial logistic regression was used to create a severity index. Comparison and regression analyses were performed with respect to disease severity.Results: Six of the nine moment parameters differed statistically significantly among severity groups (p ≤ 0.039) and five reported statistically significant correlation with disease severity (0.23 ≤ |r| ≤ 0.59). The proposed severity index was highly reliable (ICC = 0.96) and statistically significantly different between the three groups (p < 0.001) as well as correlated with disease severity (r = 0.70).Conclusion: While medial knee osteoarthritis research has mostly focused on a few knee moment parameters, this study showed that other parameters differ with disease severity. In particular, it shed light on three parameters frequently disregarded in prior works. Another important finding is the possibility of combining the parameters into a severity index, which opens promising perspectives based on a single figure assessing the knee moments in their entirety. Although the proposed index was shown to be reliable and associated with disease severity, further research will be necessary particularly to assess its validity

Transfat Representation

This study defines and analyzes representation of transfats, those who are both transgender and fat, through the examination of two popular media texts, Jabba the Hutt from The Return of the Jedi and Pat from the Saturday Night Live tv program in the 1990’s. I analyze these two texts using a queer feminist media studies lens to reveal the media construction of a transfat representation that is rooted in racism, transnormativity, and fatphobia and that positions the transfat body as non-normative and grotesque through the use of abject horror and fear. My analysis reveals how racism, transnormativity, and fatphobia shape the unique position of transfat subjects and then seeks to create more affirmative spaces for this unique and often overlooked or ignored subject position. By calling attention to the forces that have shaped transfat representation, we can work to create better, more inclusive representations that are not rooted in racism, transnormativity, and fatphobia

Transfat Representation

This study defines and analyzes representation of transfats, those who are both transgender and fat, through the examination of two popular media texts, Jabba the Hutt from The Return of the Jedi and Pat from the Saturday Night Live tv program in the 1990’s. I analyze these two texts using a queer feminist media studies lens to reveal the media construction of a transfat representation that is rooted in racism, transnormativity, and fatphobia and that positions the transfat body as non-normative and grotesque through the use of abject horror and fear. My analysis reveals how racism, transnormativity, and fatphobia shape the unique position of transfat subjects and then seeks to create more affirmative spaces for this unique and often overlooked or ignored subject position. By calling attention to the forces that have shaped transfat representation, we can work to create better, more inclusive representations that are not rooted in racism, transnormativity, and fatphobia

Adaptive patterns of movement during stair climbing in patients with knee osteoarthritis

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a distinctive characteristic in the pattern of movement (forward trunk lean to reduce demand on the quadriceps muscle) during stair climbing in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) that is associated with the severity of the disease. Twenty-three patients with radiographically diagnosed knee OA and 20 physically active adults performed stair ascending trials without support at their self-selected speed. Standard gait analysis was used to calculate three-dimensional lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics. Forward trunk lean, or trunk flexion, was defined as the sagittal plane projection of the angle between a line connecting the midpoint of the trans-acromion line and the midpoint of the trans-iliac crest line and the global vertical axis. Patients with more severe knee OA (KL >or= 3) had greater forward trunk lean (+6.3 degrees , p = 0.045) and lower knee net quadriceps moments (-35.2%, p = 0.001) than controls. In more severe patients, the forward trunk lean was correlated with a reduction in the net quadriceps moment during stair climbing (R(2) = 0.590, p = 0.006). The results of this study identified a distinctive compensatory pattern of movement to reduce the quadriceps demand during stair climbing in patients with more severe knee OA by increasing forward trunk lean. Assessing forward trunk lean during stair climbing may be a useful functional marker for evaluating osteoarthritis status and quadriceps function that appears to be a more sensitive indicator of disease severity than perceived pain

Repeatability of Gait Analysis for Measuring Knee Osteoarthritis Pain in Patients with Severe Chronic Pain

Abstract Gait measures are receiving increased attention in the evaluation of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Yet, there remains a need to assess variability of gait analysis in patients with knee osteoarthritis over time and how pain affects variation in these gait parameters. The purpose of this study was to determine if important gait parameters, such as the knee adduction moment, knee flexion moment, peak vertical ground reaction force, and speed, were repeatable in patients with mild-to-moderate knee OA over a trial period of 12 weeks. Six patients were enrolled in this cross-over study design after meeting strict inclusion criteria. Gait tests were conducted three times at 4 week intervals and once after the placebo arm of a randomized treatment sequence; each gait test followed a 2-week period of receiving a placebo for a pain modifying drug. Repeatability for each gait variable was found using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with a two-way random model. This study found that the knee adduction moment was repeatable throughout the four gait tests. However, normalized peak vertical ground reaction force and knee flexion moment were not as repeatable, varying with pain. This suggests that these gait outcomes could offer a more objective way to measure a patient\u27s level of pain

Implications of increased medio-lateral trunk sway for ambulatory mechanics

The purposes of this study was to test a mechanism to reduce the knee adduction moment by testing the hypothesis that increased medio-lateral trunk sway can reduce the knee adduction moment during ambulation in healthy subjects, and to examine the possibility that increasing medio-lateral trunk sway can produce similar potentially adverse secondary gait changes previously associated with reduced knee adduction moments in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Nineteen healthy adults performed walking trials with normal and increased medio-lateral trunk sway at a self-selected normal walking speed. Standard gait analysis was used to calculate three-dimensional lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics. Knee and hip adduction moments were lower (-65.0% and -57.1%, respectively) for the increased medio-lateral trunk sway trials than for the normal trunk sway trials. Knee flexion angle at heel-strike was 3 degrees higher for the increased than for the normal trunk sway trials. Knee and hip abduction moments were higher for the increased medio-lateral trunk sway trials, and none of the other variables differed between the two conditions. Walking with increased medio-lateral trunk sway substantially reduces the knee adduction moment during walking in healthy subjects without some of the adverse secondary effects such as increased axial loading rates at the major joints of the lower extremity. This result supports the potential of using gait retraining for walking with increased medio-lateral trunk sway as treatment for patients with degenerative joint disease such as medial compartment knee osteoarthritis

Sensitivity of Gait Parameters to the Effects of Anti-Inflammatory

Abstract The study aim was to address the need for objective markers of pain-modifying interventions by testing the hypothesis that selective gait measures of knee joint loading can distinguish differences between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID), analgesic treatment (opioid-receptor agonist), and placebo in patients medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). A randomized, single-blind washout, double-blind treatment, double-dummy cross-over trial using three treatment arms placebo, opioid (Oxycodone), and NSAID (Celecoxib) in medial compartment knee OA patients. Six patients with Kellgren–Lawrence radiographic severity grades of 2 or 3 completed six testing sessions (gait and pain assessment) at 2-week intervals. A significant increase was found in the knee total reaction moment and vertical ground reaction force (GRF) for Celecoxib compared to placebo (p = 0.005, p = 0.003), but not for Oxycodone compared to placebo (p = 0.20, p = 0.27) treatments. Walking speed was significantly higher for the Celecoxib and Oxycodone compared to placebo treatment (p = 0.041 and p = 0.031, respectively). Self-reported function (WOMAC scores) was not different among treatments (p \u3e 0.05). The changes in total reaction moments and GRFs for only the NSAID suggest that greater increases in joint loading occurs when joint inflammation is treated in addition to pain. The total knee reaction moment, representing the magnitude of the extrinsic moment, appears to be a sensitive marker, more so than self-reported metrics, for evaluating knee OA treatment effects

Kinematic Comparison between Medially Congruent and Posterior-Stabilized Third-Generation TKA Designs

Background: This study compares knee kinematics in two groups of patients who have undergone primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using two different modern designs: medially congruent (MC) and posterior-stabilized (PS). The aim of the study is to demonstrate only minimal differences between the groups. Methods: Ten TKA patients (4 PS, 6 MC) with successful clinical outcomes were evaluated through 3D knee kinematics analysis performed using a multicamera optoelectronic system and a force platform. Extracted kinematic data included knee flexion angle at heel-strike (KFH), peak midstance knee flexion angle (MSKFA), maximum and minimum knee adduction angle (KAA), and knee rotational angle at heel-strike. Data were compared with a group of healthy controls. Results: There were no differences in preferred walking speed between MC and PS groups, but we found consistent differences in knee function. At heel-strike, the knee tended to be more flexed in the PS group compared to the MC group; the MSKFA tended to be higher in the PS group compared to the MC group. There was a significant fluctuation in KAA during the swing phase in the PS group compared to the MC group, PS patients showed a higher peak knee flexion moment compared to MC patients, and the PS group had significantly less peak internal rotation moments than the MC group. Conclusions: Modern, third-generation TKA designs failed to reproduce normal knee kinematics. MC knees tended to reproduce a more natural kinematic pattern at heel-strike and during axial rotation, while PS knees showed better kinematics during mid-flexion