10 research outputs found

    Number of ITS-1 copies collected by filters and swabs.

    No full text
    <p>DNA was extracted using DNeasy kits (A) and PrepMan Ultra (B) for both swabs and filters. (−) denotes negative Bd diagnosis. Error bars indicate 95% confidence limits. Ordinate scale differs below and above axis break.</p

    Infection status of subjects dependent on PCR method of swab samples taken at 24 h and 16 days.

    No full text
    <p>1 Nested PCR.</p><p>2 Taqman probe assay.</p><p>Infection status of subjects dependent on PCR method of swab samples taken at 24 h and 16 days.</p

    Bd diagnostic methods have changed over time.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Initial histological and immunohistological approaches rapidly have given way to PCR methods, especially qPCR. (B) At first, Bd was diagnosed by collecting toe-clips, sloughed skin, and other tissues but assaying Bd infection by swabbing began in 2006 and quickly became the predominant sampling method. Publication data from Science Citation Index, Zoological Record, and Google Scholar.</p

    genotyping data corrected for null alleles

    No full text
    Genotyping results for 4 microsatellite markers, corrected for null alleles using MICROCHECKER and the exon2 of one MHC class II locus for Physalaemus pustulosus wild populations (genepop format

    Sampling of historical specimens across the Korean Peninsula used in this study.

    No full text
    <p>Specimens were collected between 1911 and 2004. Three specimens of <i>Rugosa emeljanovi</i> (previously <i>Rana</i> or <i>Glandirana rugosa</i>), collected from Wonsan, North Korea in 1911, tested qPCR positive for <i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis</i> (<i>Bd</i>) infection.</p
    corecore