22 research outputs found
Performance accuracy as a function of Punishment Risk x Conflict.
<p>High and Low Conflict is plotted separately to visualize the Punishment Risk x Conflict interaction. Error bars denote SE.</p
Response time as a function of Conflict and Punishment Expectancy.
<p>High and Low Conflict is plotted separately to visualize the Punishment Risk x Conflict interaction. Error bars denote SE.</p
Time course of Error main effect Post-response.
<p>The cEMG was amplified directly within 0–99 ms following error responses (<i>p</i><.05). Error bars denote SE.</p
The effect of Punishment Risk x Conflict on cEMG (averaged over the whole trial).
<p>Error bars denote SE.</p
Demographics.
<p>Age and education are expressed in years; MBI-GS is a questionnaire to score perceived work-related stress. Raw 3 indicates the mean total score, raw 4–5 the sub-scores for the exhaustion and cynicism. MADRS = Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale. There was no overall group difference in cortisol levels (p = 0.56; F = 0.08, repeated measure ANOVA). Time of the day for cortisol samples: <i>Sample 1</i>: 06.30–07.30; <i>Sample 2</i>: 15 minutes after sample 1; <i>Sample 3</i>: 30 minutes after sample 1; <i>Sample 4</i>: 12.00–13.00; <i>Sample 5</i>: 15.00–16.00; <i>Sample 6</i>: 20.00–21.00. <i>Sample 7</i>: 22.30–23.30.</p><p>Demographics.</p
Comparison between burnout patients and controls regarding rated regulation success across task instructions.
<p>The burnout group rated themselves as generally less successful at implementing the task instruction after viewing negative pictures. * = p<.05, # = p<.1.</p
Functional resting state connections from the amygdala in relation to stress perception.
<p>The interaction with MBI-GS is calculated at voxel threshold corresponding to p = 0.001, cluster level FWE correction at p<0.05. R = right; L = left. There were no negative covariations from the amygdala seed regions.</p><p>Functional resting state connections from the amygdala in relation to stress perception.</p
Overview of one experimental trial with the maintain instruction.
<p>Participants were presented with a picture, which was replaced by an instruction cue. For negative picture trials, this cue indicated whether the participants' task was to maintain (horizontal arrow), down- regulate (downward arrow) or enhance (upward arrow) their emotional response. Immediately following the instruction cue, participants implemented the regulation instruction while being exposed to the same picture again. Lastly, participants rated how well they managed to implement the regulation instruction on a scale of 1–7.</p