Fidelity of Target Site Duplication and Sequence Preference during Integration of Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Virus

Xenotropic murine leukemia virus (MLV)-related virus (XMRV) is a new human retrovirus associated with prostate cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome. The causal relationship of XMRV infection to human disease and the mechanism of pathogenicity have not been established. During retrovirus replication, integration of the cDNA copy of the viral RNA genome into the host cell chromosome is an essential step and involves coordinated joining of the two ends of the linear viral DNA into staggered sites on target DNA. Correct integration produces proviruses that are flanked by a short direct repeat, which varies from 4 to 6 bp among the retroviruses but is invariant for each particular retrovirus. Uncoordinated joining of the two viral DNA ends into target DNA can cause insertions, deletions, or other genomic alterations at the integration site. To determine the fidelity of XMRV integration, cells infected with XMRV were clonally expanded and DNA sequences at the viral-host DNA junctions were determined and analyzed. We found that a majority of the provirus ends were correctly processed and flanked by a 4-bp direct repeat of host DNA. A weak consensus sequence was also detected at the XMRV integration sites. We conclude that integration of XMRV DNA involves a coordinated joining of two viral DNA ends that are spaced 4 bp apart on the target DNA and proceeds with high fidelity

Phylogenetic Relationships Within the Tropical Soft Coral Genera Sarcophyton and Lobophytum (Anthozoa, Octocorallia)

The alcyonacean soft coral genera Sarcophyton and Lobophytum are conspicuous, ecologically important members of shallow reef communities throughout the Indo-West Pacific. Study of their ecology is, however, hindered by incomplete knowledge of their taxonomy: most species cannot be identified in the field and the two genera cannot always be distinguished reliably. We used a 735-bp fragment of the octocoral-specific mitochondrial protein-coding gene msh1 to construct a phylogeny for 92 specimens identified to 19 species of Lobophytum and 16 species of Sarcophyton. All phylogenetic methods used recovered a tree with three strongly supported clades. One clade included only morphologically typical Sarcophyton species with a stalk distinct from the polypary, poorly formed club-shaped sclerites in the colony surface, and large spindles in the interior of the stalk. A second clade included only morphologically typical Lobophytum colonies with lobes and ridges on the colony surface, poorly formed clubs in the colony surface, and interior sclerites consisting of oval forms with regular girdles of ornamental warts. The third distinct clade included a mix of Sarcophyton and Lobophytum nominal species with intermediate morphologies. Most of the species in this mixed clade had a polypary that was not distinct from the stalk, and the sclerites in the colony surface were clubs with well-defined heads. Within the Sarcophyton clade, specimens identified as Sarcophyton glaucum belonged to six very distinct genetic sub-clades, suggesting that this morphologically heterogeneous species is actually a cryptic species complex. Our results highlight the need for a complete taxonomic revision of these genera, using molecular data to help confirm species boundaries as well as to guide higher taxonomic decisions

Fidelity of target site duplication and sequence preference during integration of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus.

Xenotropic murine leukemia virus (MLV)-related virus (XMRV) is a new human retrovirus associated with prostate cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome. The causal relationship of XMRV infection to human disease and the mechanism of pathogenicity have not been established. During retrovirus replication, integration of the cDNA copy of the viral RNA genome into the host cell chromosome is an essential step and involves coordinated joining of the two ends of the linear viral DNA into staggered sites on target DNA. Correct integration produces proviruses that are flanked by a short direct repeat, which varies from 4 to 6 bp among the retroviruses but is invariant for each particular retrovirus. Uncoordinated joining of the two viral DNA ends into target DNA can cause insertions, deletions, or other genomic alterations at the integration site. To determine the fidelity of XMRV integration, cells infected with XMRV were clonally expanded and DNA sequences at the viral-host DNA junctions were determined and analyzed. We found that a majority of the provirus ends were correctly processed and flanked by a 4-bp direct repeat of host DNA. A weak consensus sequence was also detected at the XMRV integration sites. We conclude that integration of XMRV DNA involves a coordinated joining of two viral DNA ends that are spaced 4 bp apart on the target DNA and proceeds with high fidelity

Base composition surrounding XMRV integration sites.

<p>Base compositions of the 4-bp target site duplication (positions D1 to D4; demarcated by the thick vertical lines) and 10 bp upstream (positions −1 to −10) and downstream (positions +1 to +10) of the direct repeat were calculated. The datasets include the 13 integration sites with correct 4-bp direct repeat (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0010255#pone-0010255-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>), 472 integration sites from acutely infected DU145 cells (GenBank accession numbers EU981292 to EU981799) and 14 integration sites from human prostate cancer tissues (GenBank accession numbers EU981800 to EU981813) <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0010255#pone.0010255-Kim1" target="_blank">[14]</a>. Integration occurs between positions −1 and D1 on the top strand, and between positions D4 and +1 on the bottom strand (blue arrows). Any base in a position that is significantly overrepresented than the random dataset (<i>P</i><0.0001) is highlighted in green, while any base in a position that is significantly underrepresented than the random dataset (<i>P</i><0.0001) is highlighted in red.</p

Positions of XMRV integration sites and lengths of the target site sequence duplication.

<p>*The nucleotide position corresponds to the position of viral DNA insertion at the top strand of the chromosome indicated. Symbols + and – within the parenthesis indicate the orientation of the viral transcription is the same and opposite, respectively, to the polarity of the top strand. GenBank accession numbers for the integration site sequences are GU816075 to GU816104.</p><p>†The left LTR of the provirus contains a 5-bp deletion that includes the conserved CA dinucleotide at the viral end.</p><p>ψThe target DNA contains a T to A transversion immediately adjacent to the left LTR (position 4).</p

Integration of retroviral DNA and generation of short direct repeats flanking the provirus.

<p>(A) DNA breaking and joining steps during integration. Viral and target DNA strands are represented by thick black and parallel lines, respectively, and the viral long terminal repeats (LTRs) are depicted as grey boxes. Nucleotides at the top and bottom strands are denoted by uppercase and lowercase letters, respectively. During 3′-end processing, IN removes two nucleotides from the 3′ end of each strand of linear viral DNA so that the viral 3′ ends terminate with a conserved CA dinucleotide. Closed arrowheads denote the positions of strand transfer, a concerted cleavage-ligation reaction during which IN makes a staggered break in the target DNA. Host DNA repair enzymes fill in the resulting single-stranded gaps, denoted by D1 to D4 in the upper strand and d1 to d4 in the lower strand of target DNA, and remove the two unpaired nucleotides at the 5′ ends of the viral DNA (open arrowheads), thereby generating the short direct repeats flanking the provirus. (B) A potential pathway for generating a base transversion in the short direct repeat during XMRV integration. A coordinated integration of the two viral ends occurred at the 4-bp staggered positions as depicted by the closed arrowheads. During repair of the single-stranded gap adjacent to the upstream LTR, an adenine nucleotide was introduced at the D4 position either by misincorporation or aberrant processing of the unpaired AA-dinucleotide at the viral 5′ end. Subsequent repair of the mismatch resulted in the observed transversion (denoted by bold types).</p