19 research outputs found
Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries
Background: Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for patients discharged with opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after common surgical procedures.Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study collected data from patients undergoing common acute and elective general surgical, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic procedures. The primary outcomes were patient-reported time in severe pain measured on a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 100% and patient-reported satisfaction with pain relief during the first week following discharge. Data were collected by in-hospital chart review and patient telephone interview 1 week after discharge.Results: The study recruited 4273 patients from 144 centres in 25 countries; 1311 patients (30.7%) were prescribed opioid analgesia at discharge. Patients reported being in severe pain for 10 (i.q.r. 1-30)% of the first week after discharge and rated satisfaction with analgesia as 90 (i.q.r. 80-100) of 100. After adjustment for confounders, opioid analgesia on discharge was independently associated with increased pain severity (risk ratio 1.52, 95% c.i. 1.31 to 1.76; P < 0.001) and re-presentation to healthcare providers owing to side-effects of medication (OR 2.38, 95% c.i. 1.36 to 4.17; P = 0.004), but not with satisfaction with analgesia (beta coefficient 0.92, 95% c.i. -1.52 to 3.36; P = 0.468) compared with opioid-free analgesia. Although opioid prescribing varied greatly between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, patient-reported outcomes did not.Conclusion: Opioid analgesia prescription on surgical discharge is associated with a higher risk of re-presentation owing to side-effects of medication and increased patient-reported pain, but not with changes in patient-reported satisfaction. Opioid-free discharge analgesia should be adopted routinely
Mitigating the Effect of Multiple Event Upsets in FPGA-Based Automotive Applications
[abstract not available
FPGA-Based Fault-Tolerant Quadcopter with Fuzzy Obstacle Avoidance
[abstract not available
Fpga-based reliable fault secure design for protection against single and multiple soft errors
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) are increasingly used in industry (e.g., biomedical, space, and automotive industries). FPGAs are subjected to single, as well as multiple event upsets (SEUs and MEUs), due to the continuous shrinking of transistor dimensions. These upsets inevitably decrease system lifetime. Fault-tolerant techniques are often used to mitigate these problems. In this research, penta and hexa modular redundancy, as well as dynamic partial reconfiguration (DPR), are used to increase system reliability. We show, depending on the relative rates of the SEUs and MEUs, that penta modular redundancy has a higher reliability than hexa modular redundancy, which is a counter-intuitive result in some cases since increasing redundancy is expected to increase reliability. Focusing on penta modular redundancy, an error detection and recovery mechanism (voter) is designed. This mechanism uses the internal configuration access port (ICAP) and its associated controller, as well as DPR to mitigate SEUs and MEUs. Then, it is implemented on Xilinx Vivado tools targeting the Kintex7 7k410tfbg676 device. Finally, we show how to render this design fault secure in the event that SEUs or MEUs affect the voter itself. This fault secure voter either produces the correct output or gives an indication that the output is incorrect
Highly reliable controller implementation using a network-based fully reconfigurable FPGA for industrial applications
[abstract not available