Genetic and progeny fitness data

Genetic and progeny fitness dat

SUPP_INF_3

Site-by-species matrices for angiosperms and eudicots respectively (presence/absence data), PCA1 for temperature- and precipitation-related variables and spatial coordinates of the centroids of ecoregion polygons

Results of the generalized linear models (GLMs) examining the influence of correlated paternity on fitness measurements in seedlings of <i>Myrtus communis</i> and <i>Pistacia lentiscus</i> grown under natural field conditions.

<p>Results of the generalized linear models (GLMs) examining the influence of correlated paternity on fitness measurements in seedlings of <i>Myrtus communis</i> and <i>Pistacia lentiscus</i> grown under natural field conditions.</p

Results from generalized linear models (GLMs) examining the influence of correlated paternity on fitness measurements in seedlings of <i>Myrtus communis</i> and <i>Pistacia lentiscus</i> grown under greenhouse conditions.

<p>Results from generalized linear models (GLMs) examining the influence of correlated paternity on fitness measurements in seedlings of <i>Myrtus communis</i> and <i>Pistacia lentiscus</i> grown under greenhouse conditions.</p

<i>Pistacia lentiscus</i> seedlings survival as a function of correlated paternity in the field environment.

<p><i>Pistacia lentiscus</i> seedlings survival as a function of correlated paternity in the field environment.</p

Individual relative fecundities of the 164 <i>Pistacia lentiscus</i> male plants estimated using Klein’s Mixed Effect Mating model.

<p>Different shades refer to male plants occurring in different landscape typologies: dense tree canopy (black), sparse shrublands (grey), and linear hedges (white). Bars represent the 95% credibility intervals.</p

Wind rose percentage frequency histograms of (A) the direction of mating events detected in the paternity analysis, (B) the direction of random potential mating events (i.e. just conditioned by the spatial location of males and females), and (C) the direction of winds during the flowering season.

<p>Wind rose percentage frequency histograms of (A) the direction of mating events detected in the paternity analysis, (B) the direction of random potential mating events (i.e. just conditioned by the spatial location of males and females), and (C) the direction of winds during the flowering season.</p

Frequency histograms of effective pollination distances (black bars) estimated via paternity analysis and pairwise distances between males and the sampled mother plants (white bars).

<p>Frequency histograms of effective pollination distances (black bars) estimated via paternity analysis and pairwise distances between males and the sampled mother plants (white bars).</p

Average pairwise kinship coefficients (<i>F_ij</i>) for adult plants plotted against spatial distance in the studied fragmented landscape (circles) and in a previously-studied large continuous population (squares; reanalysed from [<b>10</b>]).

<p>Error bars represent approximate 95% confidence intervals and empty symbols mean they are significantly different from the null hypothesis of no spatial structure assessed trough permutation procedures (1000 permutations). Symbols have been slightly scrolled to facilitate visualization.</p

Genetic diversity parameters for <i>Pistacia lentiscus</i> adult plants genotyped at seven microsatellite loci.

**<p><i>P</i><0.01;</p>***<p><i>P</i><0.001;</p>ns<p>not significant.</p><p>Number of alleles (<i>A</i>), expected heterozigosity (<i>H_e</i>), Weir and Cockerham’s (1984) inbreeding coefficient (<i>f</i>), null allele frequency (<i>Null</i>) and exclusion probability for paternity analysis (<i>Exc</i>).</p