NARRATIVAS SOBRE A EDUCAÇÃO INCLUSIVA: DESAFIOS E TENSÕES NA PRÁTICA PEDAGÓGICA

A formação do professor é um desafio na proposta de escola inclusiva, sendo uma atividade de suma importância, posto que a educação é para todos, mas a maioria dos professores não estão preparados para atender estudantes público alvo da educação especial. Um dos desafios fundamentais que emergem da proposta de escola inclusiva é a formação do professor, que para Fávero (2009) é, justamente, o de repensar e ressignificar a própria concepção de educador. Isto porque, o processo educativo consiste na criação e no desenvolvimento de “contextos” educativos que possibilitem a interação crítica e criativa entre sujeitos singulares, e não simplesmente na transmissão e na assimilação disciplinar de conceitos e comportamentos estereotipados. O Núcleo de Tecnologia Educacional de Aquidauana, órgão ligado a Secretaria de Estado de Educação de Mato Grosso do Sul, propõe a formação continuada “o uso das tecnologias assistivas na prática pedagógica”, enfatizando a ação e a prática como processos de seleção e construção de conhecimentos por meio da produção simultânea, sequência didática interdisciplinar que priorizaram reflexões e debates sobre a inclusão/exclusão. É importante ressaltar que o professor busque conhecimento para que assim, possa distinguir os problemas para apresentar melhor alternativa de assimilação. Neste viés a formação continuada para inserção das tecnologias assistivas no meio acadêmico é imprescindível para a dinamização do processo de ensino e aprendizagem

NARRATIVAS SOBRE A EDUCAÇÃO INCLUSIVA: DESAFIOS E TENSÕES NA PRÁTICA PEDAGÓGICA

A formação do professor é um desafio na proposta de escola inclusiva, sendo uma atividade de suma importância, posto que a educação é para todos, mas a maioria dos professores não estão preparados para atender estudantes público alvo da educação especial. Um dos desafios fundamentais que emergem da proposta de escola inclusiva é a formação do professor, que para Fávero (2009) é, justamente, o de repensar e ressignificar a própria concepção de educador. Isto porque, o processo educativo consiste na criação e no desenvolvimento de “contextos” educativos que possibilitem a interação crítica e criativa entre sujeitos singulares, e não simplesmente na transmissão e na assimilação disciplinar de conceitos e comportamentos estereotipados. O Núcleo de Tecnologia Educacional de Aquidauana, órgão ligado a Secretaria de Estado de Educação de Mato Grosso do Sul, propõe a formação continuada “o uso das tecnologias assistivas na prática pedagógica”, enfatizando a ação e a prática como processos de seleção e construção de conhecimentos por meio da produção simultânea, sequência didática interdisciplinar que priorizaram reflexões e debates sobre a inclusão/exclusão. É importante ressaltar que o professor busque conhecimento para que assim, possa distinguir os problemas para apresentar melhor alternativa de assimilação. Neste viés a formação continuada para inserção das tecnologias assistivas no meio acadêmico é imprescindível para a dinamização do processo de ensino e aprendizagem

Effects of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery: an international prospective cohort study an international prospective cohort study

We aimed to determine the impact of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We performed an international prospective cohort study including patients undergoing elective surgery in October 2020. Isolation was defined as the period before surgery during which patients did not leave their house or receive visitors from outside their household. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, adjusted in multivariable models for measured confounders. Pre-defined sub-group analyses were performed for the primary outcome. A total of 96,454 patients from 114 countries were included and overall, 26,948 (27.9%) patients isolated before surgery. Postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded in 1947 (2.0%) patients of which 227 (11.7%) were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients who isolated pre-operatively were older, had more respiratory comorbidities and were more commonly from areas of high SARS-CoV-2 incidence and high-income countries. Although the overall rates of postoperative pulmonary complications were similar in those that isolated and those that did not (2.1% vs 2.0%, respectively), isolation was associated with higher rates of postoperative pulmonary complications after adjustment (adjusted OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.05–1.36, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses revealed no further differences when patients were categorised by: pre-operative testing; use of COVID-19-free pathways; or community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. The rate of postoperative pulmonary complications increased with periods of isolation longer than 3 days, with an OR (95%CI) at 4–7 days or ≥ 8 days of 1.25 (1.04–1.48), p = 0.015 and 1.31 (1.11–1.55), p = 0.001, respectively. Isolation before elective surgery might be associated with a small but clinically important increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Longer periods of isolation showed no reduction in the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. These findings have significant implications for global provision of elective surgical care. We aimed to determine the impact of pre-operative isolation on postoperative pulmonary complications after elective surgery during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We performed an international prospective cohort study including patients undergoing elective surgery in October 2020. Isolation was defined as the period before surgery during which patients did not leave their house or receive visitors from outside their household. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, adjusted in multivariable models for measured confounders. Pre-defined sub-group analyses were performed for the primary outcome. A total of 96,454 patients from 114 countries were included and overall, 26,948 (27.9%) patients isolated before surgery. Postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded in 1947 (2.0%) patients of which 227 (11.7%) were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients who isolated pre-operatively were older, had more respiratory comorbidities and were more commonly from areas of high SARS-CoV-2 incidence and high-income countries. Although the overall rates of postoperative pulmonary complications were similar in those that isolated and those that did not (2.1% vs 2.0%, respectively), isolation was associated with higher rates of postoperative pulmonary complications after adjustment (adjusted OR 1.20, 95%CI 1.05–1.36, p = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses revealed no further differences when patients were categorised by: pre-operative testing; use of COVID-19-free pathways; or community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. The rate of postoperative pulmonary complications increased with periods of isolation longer than 3 days, with an OR (95%CI) at 4–7 days or ≥ 8 days of 1.25 (1.04–1.48), p = 0.015 and 1.31 (1.11–1.55), p = 0.001, respectively. Isolation before elective surgery might be associated with a small but clinically important increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Longer periods of isolation showed no reduction in the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. These findings have significant implications for global provision of elective surgical care

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field