18 research outputs found
(A) comparison of shear bond strength of various orthodontic adhesives
์น์ํ๊ณผ/์์ฌ[ํ๊ธ]
๋ธ๋ผ์ผ์ ์น์์ ์ ํํ ๋ถ์ฐฉ์ํค๋ ๊ฒ์ ์ฑ๊ณต์ ์ธ ๊ต์ ์น๋ฃ์ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํด์ ๊ต์ ์ฉ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ์ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋๊ฐ ์ค์ํ๊ณ ๋ ๊ต์ ์น๋ฃ๊ฐ ์ฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ์ ์ํ๋ ์น๋ฃ์ด๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ ๊ทธ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋๊ฐ ์๊ฐ๊ณผ ์จ๋๋ณํ์ ์ํด ์ด๋ ์ ๋์ ๋ณํ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ ์ง๊ฐ ์ค์ํ๋ค๊ณ ํ
์ ์๋ค. ์ด์ ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์๋ ์์๊ฐ๋ค์ด ์ฌ์ฉํ๊ณ ์๋ ๊ต์ ์ฉ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ์ค Super C Ortho (ํผํฉํ ๊ต์ ์ฉ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ), Mono-Lok**2 (๋นํผํฉํ ๊ต์ ์ฉ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ), Transbond(๊ด์คํฉ ๊ต์ ์ฉ ์ ์ฐฉ์ )์ Fluorobond(๋ถ์๋ฅผ ํจ์ ํ ์น๋ฉด์ด๊ตฌ ๋ดํฉ์ )๋ฅผ ์ ํํ์ฌ, ๊ตฌ๊ฐ๋ด์ ๊ฐ์ ํ ๊ฒฝ์์ ์๊ฐ๊ณผ ์จ๋๋ณํ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ์ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋์ ๋ณํ๋ฅผ ์์๋ณด๊ธฐ ์ํด ์คํ๊ตฐ์ 1๊ตฐ (๋ธ๋ผ์ผ ๋ถ์ฐฉ 1์๊ฐ ํ), 27(๋ธ๋ผ์ผ ๋ถ์ฐฉ 24์๊ฐ ํ, thermocycling 10ํ ์ค์), 3๊ตฐ(๋ธ๋ผ์ผ ๋ถ์ฐฉ 24์๊ฐ ํ, thermncycling 1800ํ ์ค์)์ผ๋ก ๋ถ๋ฅํ์ฌ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ์ ์ ๋จ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋
๋ฅผ ์ธก์ ๋น๊ตํ๊ณ , ์ ์ฐฉ์ ์ธ ์ข
๋ฅ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ธ๋ผ์ผ ํ๋ฝ ์์์ ๊ด์ฐฐํ์ฌ ๋ค์๊ณผ ๊ฐ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ป์๋ค.
1. 1๊ตฐ์์๋ Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ์ Fluorobond๋ฅผ ๋ํฌํ ํ Super Ortho๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ์ ์ ๋จ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋๊ฐ ๋๊ฒ ๋ํ๋ฌ์ผ๋ฉฐ, 2๊ตฐ์์๋ Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ์ ๋ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋๊ฐ ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋๊ฒ ๋ํ๋ฌ์ผ๋, 3๊ตฐ์์๋ Mono-Lok**2 ๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ์์ ๋ ์ ์
์ฑ ์๊ฒ ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋์ ์ ๋จ ์ ์ฐฉ ๊ฐ๋๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ฌ์ฃผ์๋ค(p<0.05).
2. ์๊ฐ๊ณผ ์จ๋๋ณํ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ, Super C Ortho, Transbond๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ์๋ 2๊ตฐ์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋์ ์ ๋จ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋๋ฅผ ๋ณด์๊ณ 3๊ตฐ์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ๋ฎ์ ์ ๋จ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋๋ฅผ ๋ณด์์ผ๋, Mono-Lok**2 ๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ์ ๋๋ 3๊ตฐ์์๋ 2๊ตฐ์์์ ๊ฐ์ด ๋์ ์ ๋จ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋๋ฅผ ๋ณด์๊ณ , Fluoro
bond๋ฅผ ๋ํฌํ ํ Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ์๋ ์๊ฐ์ด ์ง๋จ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ์ ๋จ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋์ ๊ณ์์ ์ธ ๊ฐ์๋ฅผ ๋ํ๋๋ค.
3. ๋ธ๋ผ์ผ ํ๋ฝ ์์์ Mono-Lok**2 , Transbond, Fluorobond๋ฅผ ๋ํฌํ ํ Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ์๋ ์ฃผ๋ก ์น์์ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ๋ถ์์ ํ๋ฝ์ด ์ผ์ด๋ฌ์ผ๋, Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ์๋ ๋ธ๋ผ์ผ ๊ธฐ์ ๋ถ์ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ์ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ๋ถ์์์ ํ๋ฝ๊ณผ ์น์์ ์ ์ฐฉ์
๊ฒฝ๊ณ๋ถ์์ ํ๋ฝ์ด ๋น์ทํ ์ ๋๋ก ์ผ์ด๋ฌ๋ค.
์ด์์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ก ๋ณผ ๋ ๋ธ๋ผ์ผ ๋ถ์ฐฉ์ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ์ ์ ํ์ ์์ด ์๊ฐ๊ณผ ์จ๋ ๋ณํ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ ์ฐฉ์ ์ ์ ๋จ ์ ์ฐฉ๊ฐ๋์ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ์ฌ์ผ ํ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ์ฌ๋ฃ๋๋ค.
A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of various Orthodontic Adhesives
Mi- Hee You, D.0.S.
Department of Dental Science, The Graduate School, Yonsei University
(Directed by Assistant Professor Chung-Ju Hwang, D.D.S., Ph.D)
Bending of brackets is one of the essential factors for successful orthodontic
treatment, so bond strength of orthodontic adhesives are very important. The
purposes of this research are to compare shear bond strength of various orthodontic
adhesives and to evaluate failure sites. One-hundred twenty extracted human first
premolars were prepared for bonding and premolar brackets were bonded to prepared
enamel surfaces with Super C Ortho, Mono-Lok**2 , Transbond, and Super C Ortho
after applying Fluorobond. Afer bonding of brackets, teeth specimens were divided
into group 1, group 2, and group 3. In group 1, specimens were stored at humidor
37โ in 1 hour and in hour 2, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ in 24 hours,
thermocycled 10 times and in group 3, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ in 24
hours, thermocycled 1800 times. Then the Instron testing machine was used to test
the shear bond strength of brackets to enamel. After debonding, brackets and enamel
surfaces were examined under stereoscopic microscope to determine the failure sites
The results were as follows :
1. In group 1 shear bond strength was significantly highest of using Super C
Ortho after applying Fluorobond and Super C Ortho only and in group 2 also was
highest of using Super C Ortho but in group 3 was highest of using Mono-Lok**2 .
2. According to time and temperature change, in using Super C Ortho the group 2
had significantly highest strength and group 3 had lowest strength, in using
Mono-Lok**2 the group 2 and had higher strength than group 1 and in using Super C
Ortho after applying Fluorobond shear bond strength decreased constantly.
3. In Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond, Mono-Lok**2 and Transbond, the
failure sites were tooth-resin interface and in Super C Ortho were at almost same
ratio bracket base-resin interface and tooth-resin interface.
[์๋ฌธ]
Bending of brackets is one of the essential factors for successful orthodontic treatment, so bond strength of orthodontic adhesives are very important. The purposes of this research are to compare shear bond strength of various orthodontic adhesives and to evaluate failure sites. One-hundred twenty extracted human first premolars were prepared for bonding and premolar brackets were bonded to prepared enamel surfaces with Super C Ortho, Mono-Lok**2 , Transbond, and Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond. Afer bonding of brackets, teeth specimens were divided into group 1, group 2, and group 3. In group 1, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ in 1 hour and in hour 2, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ in 24 hours, thermocycled 10 times and in group 3, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ in 24 hours, thermocycled 1800 times. Then the Instron testing machine was used to test
the shear bond strength of brackets to enamel. After debonding, brackets and enamel surfaces were examined under stereoscopic microscope to determine the failure sites
The results were as follows :
1. In group 1 shear bond strength was significantly highest of using Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond and Super C Ortho only and in group 2 also was highest of using Super C Ortho but in group 3 was highest of using Mono-Lok**2 .
2. According to time and temperature change, in using Super C Ortho the group 2 had significantly highest strength and group 3 had lowest strength, in using Mono-Lok**2 the group 2 and had higher strength than group 1 and in using Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond shear bond strength decreased constantly.
3. In Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond, Mono-Lok**2 and Transbond, the failure sites were tooth-resin interface and in Super C Ortho were at almost same ratio bracket base-resin interface and tooth-resin interface.restrictio