18 research outputs found

    (A) comparison of shear bond strength of various orthodontic adhesives

    No full text
    ์น˜์˜ํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“์„ ์น˜์•„์— ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์ธ ๊ต์ • ์น˜๋ฃŒ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ๊ต์ •์šฉ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์˜ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋˜ ๊ต์ •์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์„ ์š”ํ•˜๋Š” ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ทธ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์˜จ๋„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์˜ํ•ด ์–ด๋Š ์ •๋„์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ์ง€๊ฐ€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž„์ƒ๊ฐ€๋“ค์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ต์ •์šฉ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ ์ค‘ Super C Ortho (ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ˜• ๊ต์ •์šฉ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ), Mono-Lok**2 (๋น„ํ˜ผํ•ฉํ˜• ๊ต์ •์šฉ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ), Transbond(๊ด‘์ค‘ํ•ฉ ๊ต์ •์šฉ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ)์™€ Fluorobond(๋ถˆ์†Œ๋ฅผ ํ•จ์œ ํ•œ ์น˜๋ฉด์—ด๊ตฌ ๋ด‰ํ•ฉ์ œ)๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ตฌ๊ฐ•๋‚ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ™˜ ๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์˜จ๋„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์˜ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์„ 1๊ตฐ (๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ 1์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ›„), 27(๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ 24์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ›„, thermocycling 10ํšŒ ์‹ค์‹œ), 3๊ตฐ(๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ 24์‹œ๊ฐ„ ํ›„, thermncycling 1800ํšŒ ์‹ค์‹œ)์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์˜ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„ ๋ฅผ ์ธก์ • ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ , ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์™ธ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“ ํƒˆ๋ฝ ์–‘์ƒ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ๋‹ค. 1. 1๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ Fluorobond๋ฅผ ๋„ํฌํ•œ ํ›„ Super Ortho๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์˜ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, 2๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋„ Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋‚˜, 3๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” Mono-Lok**2 ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ์œ ์˜ ์„ฑ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค(p<0.05). 2. ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์˜จ๋„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, Super C Ortho, Transbond๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” 2๊ตฐ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ  3๊ตฐ์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, Mono-Lok**2 ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ๋Š” 3๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋„ 2๊ตฐ์—์„œ์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋†’์€ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๊ณ , Fluoro bond๋ฅผ ๋„ํฌํ•œ ํ›„ Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ๊ณ„์†์ ์ธ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. 3. ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“ ํƒˆ๋ฝ ์–‘์ƒ์€ Mono-Lok**2 , Transbond, Fluorobond๋ฅผ ๋„ํฌํ•œ ํ›„ Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์ฃผ๋กœ ์น˜์•„์™€ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ถ€์—์„œ ํƒˆ๋ฝ์ด ์ผ์–ด๋‚ฌ์œผ๋‚˜, Super C Ortho๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“ ๊ธฐ์ €๋ถ€์™€ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ํƒˆ๋ฝ๊ณผ ์น˜์•„์™€ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„๋ถ€์—์„œ ํƒˆ๋ฝ์ด ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ์ •๋„๋กœ ์ผ์–ด๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๋ณผ ๋•Œ ๋ธŒ๋ผ์ผ“ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ์‹œ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์˜ ์„ ํƒ์— ์žˆ์–ด ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์˜จ๋„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ ‘์ฐฉ์ œ์˜ ์ „๋‹จ ์ ‘์ฐฉ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ๋œ๋‹ค. A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of various Orthodontic Adhesives Mi- Hee You, D.0.S. Department of Dental Science, The Graduate School, Yonsei University (Directed by Assistant Professor Chung-Ju Hwang, D.D.S., Ph.D) Bending of brackets is one of the essential factors for successful orthodontic treatment, so bond strength of orthodontic adhesives are very important. The purposes of this research are to compare shear bond strength of various orthodontic adhesives and to evaluate failure sites. One-hundred twenty extracted human first premolars were prepared for bonding and premolar brackets were bonded to prepared enamel surfaces with Super C Ortho, Mono-Lok**2 , Transbond, and Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond. Afer bonding of brackets, teeth specimens were divided into group 1, group 2, and group 3. In group 1, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ„ƒ in 1 hour and in hour 2, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ„ƒ in 24 hours, thermocycled 10 times and in group 3, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ„ƒ in 24 hours, thermocycled 1800 times. Then the Instron testing machine was used to test the shear bond strength of brackets to enamel. After debonding, brackets and enamel surfaces were examined under stereoscopic microscope to determine the failure sites The results were as follows : 1. In group 1 shear bond strength was significantly highest of using Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond and Super C Ortho only and in group 2 also was highest of using Super C Ortho but in group 3 was highest of using Mono-Lok**2 . 2. According to time and temperature change, in using Super C Ortho the group 2 had significantly highest strength and group 3 had lowest strength, in using Mono-Lok**2 the group 2 and had higher strength than group 1 and in using Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond shear bond strength decreased constantly. 3. In Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond, Mono-Lok**2 and Transbond, the failure sites were tooth-resin interface and in Super C Ortho were at almost same ratio bracket base-resin interface and tooth-resin interface. [์˜๋ฌธ] Bending of brackets is one of the essential factors for successful orthodontic treatment, so bond strength of orthodontic adhesives are very important. The purposes of this research are to compare shear bond strength of various orthodontic adhesives and to evaluate failure sites. One-hundred twenty extracted human first premolars were prepared for bonding and premolar brackets were bonded to prepared enamel surfaces with Super C Ortho, Mono-Lok**2 , Transbond, and Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond. Afer bonding of brackets, teeth specimens were divided into group 1, group 2, and group 3. In group 1, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ„ƒ in 1 hour and in hour 2, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ„ƒ in 24 hours, thermocycled 10 times and in group 3, specimens were stored at humidor 37โ„ƒ in 24 hours, thermocycled 1800 times. Then the Instron testing machine was used to test the shear bond strength of brackets to enamel. After debonding, brackets and enamel surfaces were examined under stereoscopic microscope to determine the failure sites The results were as follows : 1. In group 1 shear bond strength was significantly highest of using Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond and Super C Ortho only and in group 2 also was highest of using Super C Ortho but in group 3 was highest of using Mono-Lok**2 . 2. According to time and temperature change, in using Super C Ortho the group 2 had significantly highest strength and group 3 had lowest strength, in using Mono-Lok**2 the group 2 and had higher strength than group 1 and in using Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond shear bond strength decreased constantly. 3. In Super C Ortho after applying Fluorobond, Mono-Lok**2 and Transbond, the failure sites were tooth-resin interface and in Super C Ortho were at almost same ratio bracket base-resin interface and tooth-resin interface.restrictio
    corecore