삼국유사 고조선조의 석유환인 문제

This paper is to give a verdict which is correct either suk-yu-hwan-guk(昔有桓國) or suk-yu-hwan-in(昔有桓因), the first phrase of Ko-ki(古記) quoted from Samguk-Yusa. At first, I reviewed research history on this problem from Chosen Dynasty to modern times. From result of this review, I found two kind of decipherments on this phrase exist from Chosen Dynasty and the reason of why there were two kind of decipherments are originated from old printed versions of Samguk-Yusa, namely as guk or in was printed by variant character that there existed different kinds of decipherment. Second, I examined a decipherment as suk-yu-hwan-guk and I judged it cant be accepted because of some reasons. Scholars who insisted on suk-yu-hwan-guk is correct said that there existed a state called Hwan-guk before Tangun Chosen and Korea has very long history compared with Japanese history. So Japanese historians attempted to reduce Korean history and they denied Tangun Chosen as well as Hwanguk. As a part of this attempt, they recomposited suk-yu-hwan-guk to suk-yu-hwan-in. As far as Imsin year printed version of Samguk Yusa, it cannot be denied that guk recomposited to in. But they did not proof the a possibility of recomposite by another person. More than they did not explained that if Japanese historians try to obliterate ancient history of Korea, why they published Imsin year printed version which included another historical materials on Tangun. Last, I insisted that suk-yu-hwan-in is correct in three reasons. ① Older prinred version of Samguk Yusa, for example Parun printed version, there were suk-yu-hwan-in () and is variant character of in(因). ② According to a footnote in Samguk Yusa, Hwan-in is the same as Sakra-Devanam-Indra, ③ As historical materials written and published before Imsin year(1512) printed version, they all made mention of Hwan-in as a grandfather of King Tangun, but did not appeared as Hwan-guk. I hope that the studies on Tangun advanced based on the phrase of suk-yu-hwan-in hereafter.이 논문은 2007년도 정부재원(교육과학기술부 학술연구조성사업비)으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 연구되었음(NRF-2007-361-AM0013)

A Study on Galbanji (葛蟠地) - Buddhistic Modification of Sodo (蘇塗) -

韓國古代의 宗敎信仰을 이해하고자 한다면, 于先 關係資料의 性格을 알아 둘 필요가 있는 것 같다. 왜냐하면 關係資料의 性格을 올바로 이해하지 못한다면, 자료의 올바른 이용이 불가능하게 되고 나아가서 宗敎內容의 올바른 이해도 불가능하게 될 것이기 때문이다. 韓國古代宗敎硏究에 필요한 基本資料로는 ① 遺物·遺蹟과 ② 文獻·記錄이 있다. 그데 유물·유적은 關係記錄이 없거나 不充分한 古代社會의 宗敎研究에 있어서 절대적인 자료적 價値를 지닌다. 그러나 남아있는 遺物·遺蹟이 대체로 編年조차 확실치 않은 단편적인 것들이어서 그것을 통해 밝힐 수 있는 宗敎內容이란 것도 자연 좁은 범위의 것에 불과하게 되며, 또 이와 같은 단편적인 물질문화를 통해 宗敎와 같은 精神文化를 이해한다는데에도 일정한 限界가 따르게 되는 것이다

Ni 전해도금을 이용한 고집적도 나노스케일 저항변화메모리 소자 제작

2

Fabrication of Resistive Switching Memory Devices Using Electrochemical Deposition for High-Density Memory Applications

2