7 research outputs found

    (A) study of the correlation between discomfort and personality in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy : ํ™”ํ•™์š”๋ฒ•์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ

    No full text
    ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™๊ต์œก/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ™”ํ•™์š”๋ฒ•์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์•”ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ ์š”์ธ๊ณผ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ  ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ†ต์ œ์œ„ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ž์•„์กด์ค‘๊ฐ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•”ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ค‘์žฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋งˆ๋ จํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ์‹œ๋„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ ์„œ์šธ์‹œ๋‚ด 5๊ฐœ ๋Œ€ํ•™๋ถ€์†๋ณ‘์›๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„์˜ 2๊ฐœ ์ข…ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์›์— 1985๋…„ 8์›” 1์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 9์›” 20์ผ๊นŒ์ง€ 50์ผ๋™์•ˆ ํ™”ํ•™์š”๋ฒ•์„ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•œ ํ™˜์ž ์ „์ˆ˜์ค‘ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ์  ํ•ฉํ•œ 90๋ช…์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„๊ตฌ๋กœ๋Š”, ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฌธํ—Œ๊ณ ์ฐฐ์„ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ํ•œ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ ์ธก์ •๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ์ธก์ •์—๋Š” Wallston & Wallston์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ†ต์ œ์œ„ ํŠน ์ •๋„๊ตฌ์™€ Rosenberg์˜ ์ž์•„์กด์ค‘๊ฐ ์ธก์ •๋„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” SPSS ์ „์‚ฐ์ฒด์ œ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ t-tset, ANOVA, Prarson Correlation Coeffic ient ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ†ต๊ณ„๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. 1. ์•”ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์„ค๊ฒ€์ •๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 1) ์ œ1๊ฐ€์„ค : "๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ†ต์ œ์œ„ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ด์ ์„ฑํ–ฅ์ผ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ์ •๋„๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค"๋Š” ์ง€์ง€๋˜ ์—ˆ๋‹ค(r=-.1847, p<.05). 2) ์ œ2๊ฐ€์„ค : "๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ†ต์ œ์œ„ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์šฐ์—ฐ์„ฑํ–ฅ์ผ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ ์ •๋„๋Š” ๋†’์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค"๋Š” ์ง€์ง€ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค(r=.2930, p<.01) 3) ์ œ3๊ฐ€์„ค : "์ž์•„์กด์ค‘๊ฐ์ด ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ์ •๋„๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค."๋Š” ์ง€์ง€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.(r=.2365, p<.05) 4) ์ œ4๊ฐ€์„ค : "๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ†ต์ œ์œ„ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ด์ ์„ฑํ–ฅ์ผ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ž์•„์กด์ค‘๊ฐ์€ ๋†’์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค."๋Š” ์ง€์ง€ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.(r=.1866, p<.05) 5) ์ œ5๊ฐ€์„ค : "๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ†ต์ œ์œ„ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์šฐ์—ฐ์„ฑํ–ฅ์ผ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ž์•„์กด์ค‘๊ฐ์€ ๋‚ฎ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค."๋Š” ์ง€์ง€ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.(r=.2273, p<.05) 2. ์•”ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ์ •๋„๋Š” ํ‰๊ท  90.89์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ตœ์ € 51์ ์—์„œ ์ตœ๊ณ  136์ ์œผ๋กœ 85์ ์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3. ํ™”ํ•™์š”๋ฒ•์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ์•”ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ๋Š๋ผ๋Š” ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ์š”์ธ์€ '์น˜๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ' '์—ญํ™œ์ƒ์‹ค' '์งˆ๋ณ‘์ž์ฒด' '์˜ˆํ›„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ' '์‚ฌํšŒ๊ฒฝ์ œ์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ œ' 'ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์  ์š”์ธ' '์˜๋ฃŒํŒ€๊ณผ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ'์˜ ์ˆœ์œ„๋กœ 7๊ฐœ ์š”์ธ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 4. ์•”ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ๊ณผ ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ ์ œ ํŠน์„ฑ 1) ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ์ •๋„์™€ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ ์ œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์„ฑ๋ณ„(t=-2.05, P=.044), ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ์ƒํƒœ(F=4.048,P=.021), ์ง„๋‹จ๋ช…(F=3.726, P=.002), ์•ฝ๋ฌผ์š”๋ฒ•๊ธฐ๊ฐ„(F=2.480, P=.023) ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณ‘์‹ค์€ ์™ธ๋ž˜๋ณด๋‹ค ํ™˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค.(t=-2.54, P=.013) 2) ๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ†ต์ œ์œ„ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ ์ œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋‚ด์ ์„ฑํ–ฅ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ง์—…(F=2.149, P=.047)๊ณผ ์ง„๋‹จ๋ช…(F=2.519, P=.021)์ด์—ˆ๊ณ , ์šฐ์—ฐ์„ฑํ–ฅ๊ณผ๋Š” ์„ฑ๋ณ„(t=-2.07, P=.041)๊ณผ ๊ต์œก์ •๋„(F=3.784, P=.013) ์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3) ์ž์•„์กด์ค‘๊ฐ๊ณผ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ ์ œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๊ต์œก์ •๋„(F=3.388, P=.022)์™€ ์ง์—…(F=2.483, P=.023)์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ์„œ ์•”ํ™˜์ž๋Š” ํ™”ํ•™์š”๋ฒ•๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ์š”์ธ์—์„œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์ด ์ธ์ง€ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์„ฑ๊ฒฉ์ค‘์—์„œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ†ต์ œ์œ„ ํŠธ๊ฒ…๊ณผ ์ž์•„์กด์ค‘๊ฐ์€ ์•”ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ ์ •๋„์™€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์„ ๋‚ด๋ฆด ์ˆ˜์ž‡๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] This study was done to provide more effective care in cancer nursing practice. Therefore the study was designed to inverstigate the factors of discomfort and to test the correlation between discomfort and personality in cancer patients receiving chemitherapy. The subjucts consisted of 90 cancer patients who were receiving chemotherapy either as outpatients or inpatients at five hospitals affiliated to universities in Seoul and at two general hospitals in Kyung Gi Province. The data used for this study were the Discomfort Scale developed by the researcher, Wallston & Wallston's Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale and Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale. Analysis of data was done by means of the SPSS Program using t-test, ANOVA and Peearson Correlation Coefficient. The results of this sudy can be summarized as follows. 1. Results of testing hypothesis for relationship between discomfort and personality cancer patients: 1) The first hypothesis, "In regard to the HLC the higher the score toward internal, the lower the level of discomfort", was accepted.(r = -.1847, p<.05) 2) The second hypothesis, "In regard th the HLC the higher the score toward chance, the higher the level of discomfort", was accepted.(r = .2930, p<.01) 3) The third hypothesis, "The hither the level of self-esteem, the lower the level of discomfort", was accepted. (r = -.2365, p<.05) 4) The fourth hypothesis, "In regard to the HLC the higher the score toward internal, the higher the level of self-seteem", was accepted.(r = .1866, p<.05) 5) The fifth hypothesis, "In regard to the HLC the hither the score toward chance, the lower the level of self-esteem", was accepted.(r = -.2273, p<.05) 2. The cancer patients' discomfort level ranged from the score of 51 to 136, showing a mean of 90.89. 3. The scale of factors by severity in shemotherapy cancer patients' discomfort was 'problems of treatment', "loss of rule', 'illness itself', 'uncertainty concerning the prognosis', "socioeconomic problems', 'unappropriate environment' and 'problems resulting from interaction with the medical team'. 4. Analysis of the demographic factors influencing discomfort and personality in cancer patients: 1) Analysis of factors influencing discomfort; gender (t = -2.05, p = .044), marital status (F=4.048, P=.021), diagnosis (F = 3.726, P = .002), length of time of chemotherapy (F = 2.480, P = .023). Also wards were less ventilated then out-patient dapartments. (t = -2.54, P = .013) 2) Analysis of factors influencing health locus of control; Internal; occupation (F = 2.149, P = .047), diagnosis (F = 2.519, P = .013) Chance; genger (t = -2.07, P = .041), level of education (F = 3.784, P = .013) 3) Analysis of factors influencing self-esteem; level of education (F = 3.388,P = .022) occupation (F = 2.483, P = .023) In conclusion, it was found that cancer patients perceived problems of treatment as the highest factor by severity related th chemotherapy. It was also found that cancer patients' discomfort was correlated with health locus of control and self-esteem of personalityrestrictio
    corecore