11 research outputs found
(A) structural model for quality of life in women having hysterectomies
κ°νΈνκ³Ό/λ°μ¬[νκΈ]
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ μκΆμ μ μ μ λ°μ μ¬μ±μ μΆμ μ§μ μν₯νλ λ³μΈλ€μ νμ
νμ¬ μΆμ μ§μ μ€λͺ
, μμΈ‘νλ ꡬ쑰λͺ¨νμ ꡬμΆνκΈ° μνμ¬ μ€μλμλ€.
μ°κ΅¬μ κ°μ€μ λͺ¨νμ λ¬Ένκ³ μ°°κ³Ό μ νμ°κ΅¬λ₯Ό ν λλ‘ κ΅¬μ±νμλ€. λΆλΆμΉλ°λ, μκΆμ€μλ, μλ£μΈμ§μ§, μμ μ μ¦μμ λ, μ κ·Ήμ λμ²μ νμ λͺ¨νλ΄μμ μΈμλ³μΈμΌλ‘ μ²λ¦¬λμκ³ , λ°°μ°μμ§μ§, μμ€κ°, μΆμ μ§μ λ΄μλ³μΈμΌλ‘ 14κ°μ μ°κ΅¬κ°μ€μ΄ μ€μ λμλ€.
λͺ¨νκ²μ¦μ μν μλ£μμ§μ 1997λ
12μ 20μΌλΆν° 1998λ
2μ 24μΌκΉμ§ λΆμ°μλ΄ 4κ° μ’
ν©λ³μ μΈλμ μ°νΈμ§μ€λ¬Έλ²μ μ΄μ©νμ¬ 203λͺ
μ λμμΌλ‘ μλ£μμ§μ΄ μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ‘λ€. λͺ¨νκ²μ¦μ μ΄μ©λ 8κ°μ μ°κ΅¬λꡬμ Cronbach's Alphaκ°μ λ²μλ 0.639μμ 0.915μλ€.
μ°κ΅¬μ κΈ°μ μ ν΅κ³μ μκ΄κ΄κ³ λΆμμ SPSS 7.5 WIN Programμ μ΄μ©νμκ³ , κ°μ€μ λͺ¨νκ²μ¦μ LISREL 8.12 WIN Programμ μ΄μ©νμ¬ κ³΅λΆμ° ꡬ쑰λΆμ μ νμλ€.
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μ κ²°κ³Όλ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€
1. λͺ¨νμ λΆν©λ λΆμκ²°κ³Ό
1) κ°μ€μ λͺ¨νμ μ λ°μ λΆν©μ§μλ λκ² λνλ λͺ¨νκ³Ό μ€μ μλ£κ° μ λΆν©νλ κ²μΌλ‘ λμλ€ [Ο**2 =6.93(df=5, p=.23), GFI=.99, AGFI=.94, RMSR=.019, NNFl=.97, NFI=.98, CN=440, νμ€νμμ°¨(-2.14βΌ2.10) ].
2) λͺ¨νμ κ°λͺ
ν¨κ³Ό λΆν©λλ₯Ό λμ΄κΈ° μνμ¬ μ΄λ‘ μ νλΉμ±κ³Ό μΈλΆμ μ§μλ₯Ό μ΄μ©νμ¬ 1κ°μ κ²½λ‘λ₯Ό μΆκ°νκ³ 3κ°μ κ²½λ‘λ₯Ό μ κ±°νμ¬ μμ λͺ¨νμ ꡬμ±νμλ€. μμ λͺ¨νμ λΆν©μ§μλ κ°μ€μ λͺ¨νμ λΆν©μ§μλ³΄λ€ λ μνΈν κ²μΌλ‘ λμλ€ [Ο**2 =5.26(df=7, p=.63),
GFI=.99, AGFI=.97, RMSR=.014, NNFI=1.02, NFI=.99, CN=710, νμ€νμμ°¨(-1.46βΌ 1.70) ].
2. κ°μ€κ²μ¦ κ²°κ³Ό
1) λΆλΆμΉλ°λ(Ξ³11=.78, t=14.37)μ μλ£μΈμ§μ§(Ξ³13=.12, t=2.12)λ λ°°μ°μμ§μ§μ ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μν μ§μ ν¨κ³Όκ° μλ κ²μΌλ‘ λμλ€.
2) μμ€κ°μ μμ μ μ¦μμ λ(Ξ³25=.32, t=3.12), μκΆμ€μλ(Ξ³22=.20, t=2.61),λ°°μ°μμ§μ§(Ξ²21=-.19, t=-2.43)λ‘λΆν° ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μν μ§μ μ μΈ μν₯μ λ°μλ€. λμ²μ ν( Ξ³24=-.11, t=-1.25)μ μμ€κ°μ μ μν μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉμ§ μμλ€.
3) μΆμ μ§μ μμ€κ°(Ξ²32=-.66, t=-9.831)μΌλ‘ λΆν° μ μνκ² μ§μ μ μΈ μν₯μ λ°μκ³ , λΆλΆμΉλ°λλ μΆμμ§μ μ§μ ν¨κ³Ό(Ξ³31=.19,t=3.33)μΈμ κ°μ ν¨κ³Ό(ν¨κ³Όκ³μ=.14, t=2.52
)μ μ΄ν¨κ³Ό(ν¨κ³Όκ³μ=.25, t=4.41)μμλ λͺ¨λ μ μν μν₯μ λ―Έμ³€λ€. μλ£μΈμ§μ§λ μ§μ ν¨κ³Ό(Ξ³33=.11, t=2.07)μ κ°μ ν¨κ³Ό(ν¨κ³Όκ³μ=.02, t=1.71)λ₯Ό ν¬ν¨ν μ΄ν¨κ³Ό(ν¨κ³Όκ³μ=.13, t=2.31)μμ μΆμ μ§μ μ μν μν₯μ λ―Έμ³€λ€. μμ μ μ¦μμ λμ(ν¨κ³Όκ³μ=-.36, t=-4.02) μ κ·Ήμ λμ²μ ν(ν¨κ³Όκ³μ=.15, t=2.06)μ μ§μ ν¨κ³Όλ μ μνμ§ μμΌλ κ°μ ν¨κ³Όμ μν₯μΌλ‘ μ΄ν¨κ³Όκ° ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μνμλ€.
μ΄μμ λͺ¨νκ²μ¦ κ²°κ³Ό λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬μμ ꡬμΆν μ¬μ±μ μκΆμ μ μ ν μΆμ μ§ κ΅¬μ‘°λͺ¨νμ μ€μ μλ£μ μ λΆν©νμ¬ μκΆμ μ λ₯Ό λ°μ μ¬μ±μ μΆμ μ§μ μμΈ‘νκΈ°μ μ ν©ν λͺ¨νμ΄λΌκ³ μ¬λ£λλ€. λͺ¨νκ²μ¦ κ²°κ³Ό μκΆμ μ μ ν μΆμ μ§μ μμ€κ°μ΄ κ°μ₯ μν₯μ λ§μ΄ λ―ΈμΉλ μ€μν 맀κ°λ³μΈμΌλ‘ νμΈλμλ€. μμ€κ°μμκΆμ λν μ€μλμ μμ μ μ¦μμ λ λ° λ°°μ°μμ§μ§μ μν₯μ λ°μκ³ , λ°°μ°μμ§μ§λ λΆλΆμΉλ°λμ μ§μ μ μΈ μν₯μ λ°μλ€.
μ°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό ν λλ‘ μ λ¬Έμ μ§μ§νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ κ°λ°κ³Ό νμ©μ ν΅νμ¬ μκΆμ λν μ΄ν΄λλ₯Ό λμ΄κ³ λ°°μ°μμ§μ§λ₯Ό λλͺ¨νμ¬ μΆμ μ§μ κ°μ₯ μ§μ μ μΈ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμ€κ°μ μννλλ° ν΅μ¬μ λμ΄μΌ ν κ²μ΄λ€. μμΈλ¬ μλ°©μ μμ€μκ°νΈμ€μ¬λ₯Ό μν΄ μμ μ μ¦μμ λμ
λΆλΆμΉλ°λλ₯Ό νμ
ν¨μΌλ‘μ μμ ν μμ€κ°μ μμΈ‘νμ¬ κ°νΈμ€μ¬κ° νμν μ°μ μ μΈ λμμλ₯Ό μν μ€μ μ μΈ κ·Όκ±°λ₯Ό λ§λ ¨νμ¬μΌ ν κ²μ΄λ€.
[μλ¬Έ]
The purpose of this study was to develope and test the structural model for quality of life in women having hysterectomies.
A hypothetical model was constructed on the basis of previous studies and a review of literature. The conceptual framework was built around eight constructs. Exogenous variables included in this model were marital intimacy, importance of uterus, professional support, positive coping behavior and pre-operative symptoms. Endogenous variables were spouse's support, sense of loss and quality of life.
Empirical data for testing the hypothetical model was collected using a self-report questionnare from 203 women having hysterectomies at the outpatient clinics of four general hospitals and a mail survey in Pusan City.
The Data was collected from December, 1997 to January, 1998,Reliability of the eight instruments was tested with Cronbach's alpha which ranged from 0.639-0.915.
For the data analysis, SPSS 7.5 WIN Program and LISREL 8.12 WIN Program were used for descriptive statistics and covariance structural analysis.
The results of covariance structure analysis were as follows:
1. Hypothetical model showed a good fit with the empirical data.[Ο**2 =6.93(df=5, p=.23), GFI=.99, AGFI=.94, RMSR=.019, NNFI=.97, NFI=.98, CN=440, standardized residuals(-2.14-2.10) ]
2. For the parsimony of model, a modified model was constructed by deleting 3 paths and adding 1 path according to the criteria of statistical significance and meaning.
3. The modified model also showed a good fit with the data.[Ο**2 =5.26(df=7,P=.63), GFI=.99, AGFl=.97, RMSR=.014, NNFI=1.02, NFI=.99, CN=710, standardized residuals(-1.46-170) ]
Results of the testing of the hypothesis were as follows:
1. Marital intimacy( Ξ³ ll=.78, t=14.37) and professional support(Ξ³13=.12,t=2.12) had a significant direct effect on the spouse's support.
2. Pre-operative symptoms( Ξ³25=.32, t=3.12), importance of uterus(Ξ³22=.20,t=2.61) and spouse's support( Ξ²21=-.19, t=-2.43) had a significant direct effect on the sense of loss.
3. Sense of loss( Ξ²32=-.66, t=-9.83) had a direct effect on the quality of life. Marital intimacy had a direct( Ξ³31=.19, t=3.33) , indirect( Ξ³31=.14, t=2.52)and total effect( Ξ³31=.25, t=4.41) on the quality of life. Professional support had a direct effect( Ξ³33=.11, t=2.07) and total effect( Ξ³33=.13,t=2.31) on the quality of life. The direct effect of pre-operative symptoms( Ξ³35=-.36, t=-4.02) and positive coping behavior(Ξ³34=.15,t=2.06) had the insignificant effect on the quality of life while, due to the idirect effect these variables had overall significant effect on the quality of life.
The results of this study showed that the sense of loss had the most significant direct effect on the quality of life. Marital intimacy, pre-operative symptoms and spouse's support had a significant direct effect on this sense of loss. These four
variables, the sense of loss, marital intimacy, pre-operative symptoms and spouse's support, were identified as relatively important variables,
The results of this study suggested that there is needed to determine if nursing intervention would alleviate this sense of lass and promote a greater quality of life in women who have had hysterectomies.restrictio