2 research outputs found

    ์‹ฌ์ธต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ž๋™ํ™”๋œ ์น˜๊ณผ ์˜๋ฃŒ์˜์ƒ ๋ถ„์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์น˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์น˜์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2021.8. ํ•œ์ค‘์„.๋ชฉ ์ : ์น˜๊ณผ ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ๋„ ์‹ฌ์ธต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง(Deep Neural Network) ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์‚ฌ์ง„์—์„œ์˜ ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜, ๋ณ‘์†Œ ์œ„์น˜ ํƒ์ง€ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ํ‚คํฌ์ธํŠธ ํƒ์ง€(keypoint detection) ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋˜๋Š” ์ „์ฒด์  ๊ตฌํšํ™”(panoptic segmentation) ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์˜๋ฃŒ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์•„์ง ๋ฏธ๋น„ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ์น˜๊ทผ๋‹จ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์‚ฌ์ง„์—์„œ ํ‚คํฌ์ธํŠธ ํƒ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ ๊ณจ ์†Œ์‹ค ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ panoptic segmentation์„ ํŒŒ๋…ธ๋ผ๋งˆ์˜์ƒ์— ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ๋“ค์„ ๊ตฌํšํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํ•™์Šต์‹œ์ผœ ์ง„๋ฃŒ์— ๋ณด์กฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๋„๋ก ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด๋ณด๊ณ , ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค์˜ ์ถ”๋ก ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•ด๋ณด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฐฉ ๋ฒ•: ๊ฐ์ฒด ํƒ์ง€ ๋ฐ ๊ตฌํšํ™”์— ์žˆ์–ด ๋„๋ฆฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋œ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๋ชจ๋ธ์ธ Mask-RCNN์„ ํ‚คํฌ์ธํŠธ ํƒ์ง€๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ์ค€๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์น˜๊ทผ๋‹จ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์‚ฌ์ง„์—์„œ ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ์˜ top, apex, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  bone level ์ง€์ ์„ ์ขŒ์šฐ๋กœ ์ด 6์ง€์  ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ๋” ํ•™์Šต์‹œํ‚จ ๋’ค, ํ•™์Šต์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‹œํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํƒ์ง€์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ํ‚คํฌ์ธํŠธ ํƒ์ง€ ํ‰๊ฐ€์šฉ ์ง€ํ‘œ์ธ object keypoint similarity (OKS) ๋ฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ average precision (AP) ๊ฐ’์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ํ‰๊ท  OKS๊ฐ’์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋ฐ ์น˜๊ณผ์˜์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํƒ์ง€๋œ ํ‚คํฌ์ธํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์‚ฌ์ง„์ƒ์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณจ ์†Œ์‹ค ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. Panoptic segmentation์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ์—์„œ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ์ ์„ ๊ฑฐ๋‘” ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๋ชจ๋ธ์ธ Panoptic DeepLab์„ ํŒŒ๋…ธ๋ผ๋งˆ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ(์ƒ์•…๋™, ์ƒ์•…๊ณจ, ํ•˜์•…๊ด€, ํ•˜์•…๊ณจ, ์ž์—ฐ์น˜, ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋œ ์น˜์•„, ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ)์„ ๊ตฌํšํ™”ํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•™์Šต์‹œํ‚จ ๋’ค, ์‹œํ—˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์—์„œ์˜ ๊ตฌํšํ™” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— panoptic / semantic / instance segmentation ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€์ง€ํ‘œ๋“ค์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ , ํ”ฝ์…€๋“ค์˜ ์ •๋‹ต(ground truth) ํด๋ž˜์Šค์™€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์ถ”๋ก ํ•œ ํด๋ž˜์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ confusion matrix๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ ๊ณผ: OKS๊ฐ’์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ ํ‚คํฌ์ธํŠธ ํƒ์ง€ AP๋Š”, ๋ชจ๋“  OKS threshold์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ‰๊ท ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ƒ์•… ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ์—์„œ๋Š” 0.761, ํ•˜์•… ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ์—์„œ๋Š” 0.786์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ท  OKS๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด 0.8885, ์น˜๊ณผ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ 0.9012๋กœ, ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค (p = 0.41). ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํ‰๊ท  OKS ๊ฐ’์€ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ํ‚คํฌ์ธํŠธ ์–ด๋…ธํ…Œ์ด์…˜ ์ •๊ทœ๋ถ„ํฌ์ƒ์—์„œ ์ƒ์œ„ 66.92% ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ๋…ธ๋ผ๋งˆ์˜์ƒ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๊ตฌํšํ™”์—์„œ๋Š”, panoptic segmentation ํ‰๊ฐ€์ง€ํ‘œ์ธ panoptic quality ๊ฐ’์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ชจ๋“  ํด๋ž˜์Šค์˜ ํ‰๊ท ์€ 80.47์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋œ ์น˜์•„๊ฐ€ 57.13์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๊ณ  ํ•˜์•…๊ด€์ด 65.97๋กœ ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. Semantic segmentation ํ‰๊ฐ€์ง€ํ‘œ์ธ globalํ•œ Intersection over Union (IoU) ๊ฐ’์€ ๋ชจ๋“  ํด๋ž˜์Šค ํ‰๊ท  0.795์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•˜์•…๊ด€์ด 0.639๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๊ณ  ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋œ ์น˜์•„๊ฐ€ 0.656์œผ๋กœ ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ๋กœ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. Confusion matrix ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ground truth ํ”ฝ์…€๋“ค ์ค‘ ์˜ฌ๋ฐ”๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ถ”๋ก ๋œ ํ”ฝ์…€๋“ค์˜ ๋น„์œจ์€ ํ•˜์•…๊ด€์ด 0.802๋กœ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ๊ฐ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ IoU๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ Instance segmentation ํ‰๊ฐ€์ง€ํ‘œ์ธ AP๊ฐ’์€, ๋ชจ๋“  IoU threshold์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ‰๊ท ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋œ ์น˜์•„๊ฐ€ 0.316, ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ๊ฐ€ 0.414, ์ž์—ฐ์น˜๊ฐ€ 0.520์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ ๋ก : ํ‚คํฌ์ธํŠธ ํƒ์ง€ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, ์น˜๊ทผ๋‹จ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์‚ฌ์ง„์—์„œ ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์ง€์ ์„ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๊ณผ ๋‹ค์†Œ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ํƒ์ง€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํƒ์ง€๋œ ์ง€์ ๋“ค์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์‚ฌ์ง„์ƒ์—์„œ์˜ ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ ์ฃผ์œ„ ๊ณจ ์†Œ์‹ค ๋น„์œจ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์„ ์ž๋™ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ์ด ๊ฐ’์€ ์ž„ํ”Œ๋ž€ํŠธ ์ฃผ์œ„์—ผ์˜ ์‹ฌ๋„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŒŒ๋…ธ๋ผ๋งˆ ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ๋Š” panoptic segmentation์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์•…๋™๊ณผ ํ•˜์•…๊ด€์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ๋“ค์„ ๊ตฌํšํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ฐ ์ž‘์—…์— ๋งž๋Š” ์‹ฌ์ธต์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง์„ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ํ•™์Šต์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค๋ฉด ์ง„๋ฃŒ ๋ณด์กฐ ์ˆ˜๋‹จ์œผ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.Purpose: In dentistry, deep neural network models have been applied in areas such as implant classification or lesion detection in radiographs. However, few studies have applied the recently developed keypoint detection model or panoptic segmentation model to medical or dental images. The purpose of this study is to train two neural network models to be used as aids in clinical practice and evaluate them: a model to determine the extent of implant bone loss using keypoint detection in periapical radiographs and a model that segments various structures on panoramic radiographs using panoptic segmentation. Methods: Mask-RCNN, a widely studied convolutional neural network for object detection and instance segmentation, was constructed in a form that is capable of keypoint detection, and trained to detect six points of an implant in a periapical radiograph: left and right of the top, apex, and bone level. Next, a test dataset was used to evaluate the inference results. Object keypoint similarity (OKS), a metric to evaluate the keypoint detection task, and average precision (AP), based on the OKS values, were calculated. Furthermore, the results of the model and those arrived at by a dentist were compared using the mean OKS. Based on the detected keypoint, the peri-implant bone loss ratio was obtained from the radiograph. For panoptic segmentation, Panoptic DeepLab, a neural network model ranked high in the previous benchmark, was trained to segment key structures in panoramic radiographs: maxillary sinus, maxilla, mandibular canal, mandible, natural tooth, treated tooth, and dental implant. Then, each evaluation metric of panoptic, semantic, and instance segmentation was applied to the inference results of the test dataset. Finally, the confusion matrix for the ground truth class of pixels and the class inferred by the model was obtained. Results: The AP of keypoint detection for the average of all OKS thresholds was 0.761 for the upper implants and 0.786 for the lower implants. The mean OKS was 0.8885 for the model and 0.9012 for the dentist; thus, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.41). The mean OKS of the model was in the top 66.92% of the normal distribution of human keypoint annotations. In panoramic radiograph segmentation, the average panoptic quality (PQ) of all classes was 80.47. The treated teeth showed the lowest PQ of 57.13, and the mandibular canal showed the second lowest PQ of 65.97. The Intersection over Union (IoU) was 0.795 on average for all classes, where the mandibular canal showed the lowest IoU of 0.639, and the treated tooth showed the second lowest IoU of 0.656. In the confusion matrix, the proportion of correctly inferred pixels among the ground truth pixels was the lowest in the mandibular canal at 0.802. The AP, averaged for all IoU thresholds, was 0.316 for the treated tooth, 0.414 for the dental implant, and 0.520 for the normal tooth. Conclusion: Using the keypoint detection neural network model, it was possible to detect major landmarks around dental implants in periapical radiographs to a degree similar to that of human experts. In addition, it was possible to automate the calculation of the peri-implant bone loss ratio on periapical radiographs based on the detected keypoints, and this value could be used to classify the degree of peri-implantitis. In panoramic radiographs, the major structures including the maxillary sinus and the mandibular canal could be segmented using a neural network model capable of panoptic segmentation. Thus, if deep neural networks suitable for each task are trained using suitable datasets, the proposed approach can be used to assist dental clinicians.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Materials and methods 5 Chapter 3. Results 23 Chapter 4. Discussion 32 Chapter 5. Conclusions 45 Published papers related to this study 46 References 47 Abbreviations 52 Abstract in Korean 53 Acknowledgements 56๋ฐ•

    Production of a Bacteria-like Particle Vaccine Targeting Rock Bream (Oplegnathus fasciatus) Iridovirus Using Nicotiana benthamiana

    No full text
    Viral diseases are extremely widespread infections that change constantly through mutations. To produce vaccines against viral diseases, transient expression systems are employed, and Nicotiana benthamiana (tobacco) plants are a rapidly expanding platform. In this study, we developed a recombinant protein vaccine targeting the major capsid protein (MCP) of iridovirus fused with the lysine motif (LysM) and coiled-coil domain of coronin 1 (ccCor1) for surface display using Lactococcus lactis. The protein was abundantly produced in N. benthamiana in its N-glycosylated form. Total soluble proteins isolated from infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves were treated sequentially with increasing ammonium sulfate solution, and recombinant MCP mainly precipitated at 40โ€“60%. Additionally, affinity chromatography using Niโ€“NTA resin was applied for further purification. Native structure analysis using size exclusion chromatography showed that recombinant MCP existed in a large oligomeric form. A minimum OD600 value of 0.4 trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-treated L. lactis was required for efficient recombinant MCP display. Immunogenicity of recombinant MCP was assessed in a mouse model through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with serum-injected recombinant MCP-displaying L. lactis. In summary, we developed a plant-based recombinant vaccine production system combined with surface display on L. lactis.11Nsciescopuskc
    corecore