64 research outputs found

    ์ง€์—ญ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ํˆฌ์žํ˜‘์•ฝ์ œ๋„ ๋„์ž…๋ฐฉ์•ˆ(A study on the intergovernmental agreement system for regional development cooperation)

    Get PDF
    ๋…ธํŠธ : ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๊ตญํ† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›์˜ ์ž์ฒด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌผ๋กœ์„œ ์ •๋ถ€์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์ด๋‚˜ ๊ฒฌํ•ด์™€๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

    ์ง€๋ฐฉ์œก์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์ง€์›์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑํ™” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ(A study on the differentiation of national assistance for the promotion of regional development)

    Get PDF
    ๋…ธํŠธ : ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๊ตญํ† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›์˜ ์ž์ฒด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌผ๋กœ์„œ ์ •๋ถ€์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์ด๋‚˜ ๊ฒฌํ•ด์™€๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

    ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑํ™” ๋ฐœ์ „์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‚ฐ์—…๋ณ„ ์ˆ˜์œ„๋„์‹œ ์œก์„ฑ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ(A study on the promotion of industrial capital cities for the development of specialized regions in Korea)

    Get PDF
    ๋…ธํŠธ : ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๊ตญํ† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›์˜ ์ž์ฒด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌผ๋กœ์„œ ์ •๋ถ€์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์ด๋‚˜ ๊ฒฌํ•ด์™€๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

    ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ํ™” ๋œ ํŒจํ„ด ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์กฐ์ •์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์ž๋™ ์˜์ƒ ๋งž์ถค ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2019. 8. ๊ณ ํ˜•์„.This dissertation proposes a fit customization method using a physically-based clothing simulator. As the input, it takes (1) the 3D geometry of the avatar in a static pose and (2) the preliminary 3D garment (i.e., the panels comprising the garment with the seams defined between the panels). The method produces the customized version of the input garment the fit of which to the given body is enhanced compared to the original garment. The method starts by creating the preliminary garment panels using the parameterized pattern making (PPM). Referring to the given body measurements, the PPM generates panels according to the drafting scheme currently being employed. The panels are automatically sewn and draped onto the input body. Now, the fit evaluation is performed to analyze the fit. The fit evaluation calculates the misfits in a number of specified items (e.g., chest height, waist circumference, and etc.), which tells how much the corresponding garment landmark points (GLPs)/body landmark points (BLPs) and garment landmark lines (GLLs)/body landmark lines (BLLs) are dislocated. If the fit is not satisfactory, the misfit values are converted to the parameter compensation values, which are used for panel modification proposed as parameterized pattern adjustment (PPA). The above is repeated as a loop until the fit is satisfactory. If the fit is satisfactory (i.e., if all the misfit values are less than the threshold), then it exits the fit adjustment loop and starts the free modification (FM) that performs non-schematic panel modifications to cope with the peculiar body shape. A number of experimental results are shown, which verifies that the proposed method customizes the fit of the garment to the given body.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์˜์ƒ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜์ƒ์˜ ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ๋ฅผ ๋งž์ถ”๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ (1) ์ •์  ์ž์„ธ์˜ 3D ์•„๋ฐ”ํƒ€ ๋ชจ๋ธ, (2) 3D ์˜์ƒ (ํŒจ๋„๋“ค ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์ด์Œ๋งค๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์˜์ƒ์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ํŒจ๋„๋“ค) ์„ ์ž…๋ ฅ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์›๋ž˜ ์˜์ƒ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ์‹ ์ฒด์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ์˜์ƒ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ํ™” ๋œ ํŒจํ„ด ๋ฉ”์ดํ‚น ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• (PPM)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ˆ๋น„ ์˜์ƒ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ์‹ ์ฒด ์น˜์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์—ฌ, PPM์€ ํ˜„์žฌ ์ ์šฉ๋œ ์ œ๋„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์˜์ƒ ํŒจ๋„์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ์˜์ƒ ํŒจ๋„๋“ค์€ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์žฌ๋ด‰๋˜์–ด ์ž…๋ ฅ๋œ ์‹ ์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ž…ํ˜€์ง„๋‹ค. ์ด์–ด์„œ ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ๋‹ค. ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋Š” ๊ฐ€์Šด ๋†’์ด, ํ—ˆ๋ฆฌ๋‘˜๋ ˆ ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์ง€์ •๋œ ํ•ญ๋ชฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉ (misfit) ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉ์˜ ๊ฐ’์€ ์„œ๋กœ ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์ƒ ํŠน์ง•์ ๊ณผ ์‹ ์ฒด ํŠน์ง•์ , ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์˜์ƒ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๊ณผ ์‹ ์ฒด ํŠน์ง•์„ ์ด ์„œ๋กœ ์ž˜๋ชป ์œ„์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งŒ์•ฝ ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ์˜ ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฝ์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋‹ค๋ฉด, ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉ์˜ ๊ฐ’์€ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ณด์ • ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜๋˜์–ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ํ™” ๋œ ํŒจํ„ด ์ˆ˜์ •๋ฒ• (PPA)์— ์˜ํ•ด ํŒจ๋„์˜ ์ˆ˜์ •์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ณผ์ •์€ ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ๊ฐ€ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ถฉ์กฑ (์˜ˆ๋ฅผ ๋“ค์–ด, ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉ์˜ ๊ฐ’์ด ํ—ˆ์šฉ ์ž„๊ณ„ ๊ฐ’๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž‘์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ) ํ•  ๋•Œ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต๋œ๋‹ค. ๋งŒ์•ฝ ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ๊ฐ€ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ ๋งž์ถค์˜ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ค‘์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ž์œ  ์ˆ˜์ • (FM)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ณ€ํ˜•ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ž์œ  ์ˆ˜์ •์€ ์‹ ์ฒด์˜ ํŠน์ด ํ˜•ํƒœ์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋น„์ •ํ˜•์  ํŒจํ„ด ๋ณ€ํ˜• ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ์‹ ์ฒด์— ์˜๋ณต์˜ ๋งž์Œ์ƒˆ๋ฅผ ๋งž์ถค์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋„์‹œ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 2 Previous Work 9 2.1 Garment Fit Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2 Garment Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.3 Garment Customization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.4 Garment Pattern Modification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3 Preliminaries 21 3.1 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.2 Body Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.2.1 Body Landmark Points and Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.2.2 3D Body Generation and Size Measurement . . . . . . 23 3.2.3 Reference Pose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.3 Garment Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.3.1 Drafting Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.3.2 Garment Landmark Points and Lines . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.4 Physically-Based Clothing Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 4 Problem Description 31 4.1 Formulation as an Optimization Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 4.2 Motivations for Heuristic Misfit Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 4.2.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 4.2.2 Formulation as a Misfit Reduction Program . . . . . . . 34 4.2.3 Execution of HMR Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 4.3 Overall Scheme of Proposed Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 5 Fit Evaluation 41 5.1 Misfit Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 5.1.1 Landmark-Point Misfit (LP-misfit) . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 5.1.2 Landmark-Line Misfit (LL-misfit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 5.1.3 Size Misfit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 5.2 Proper Try-On . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 6 Pattern Making 49 6.1 Parameterized Pattern Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 6.1.1 Hierarchy of Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 6.1.2 Drawing of the Drafting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 6.2 Enabling Design Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 6.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 7 Fit Adjustment 69 7.1 Parameterized Pattern Adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 7.2 Free Modification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 7.2.1 Classification of Peculiarity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 7.2.2 Properties of Free Modification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 7.2.3 Free Modification Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 7.2.4 Case Study: Resolving Peculiarity of Belly . . . . . . . 87 7.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 8 Conclusion 99 Bibliography 103 ์ดˆ ๋ก 115Docto

    ๊ตํ•ฉ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ณผ๋‘์œ ๋„๊ฐ ๋ฐ ์ ˆ์น˜์œ ๋„๊ฐ์˜ ์ƒ๋Œ€์  ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๊ฒ€์ฆ

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์น˜์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2015. 2. ๊ถŒํ˜ธ๋ฒ”.Objectives: The effects of condylar guidance on occlusion have been long discussed throughout the literature. Recently, simplified mounting technique by average setting the posterior component of occlusion has been advocated by some Prosthodontic clinician and this technique has been reported as clinically successful by several authors. However, the experimental explanation how average mounting offsets the consequence of deviation from individual condylar guidance is unclear yet. The purpose of this study was to verify the relative occlusal influence of condylar guidance compared to incisal guidance, and to examine the occlusal consequence of condylar guidance error during non-working side movement in articulator. Materials and Methods: Three dimensional positions of non-working side maxillary 1st molar at different condylar and incisal settings were traced by use of laser displacement sensor attached on the motorized stages with biaxial freedom of movement. For the experiment, customized incisal pin andtable for arcon type Denar articulator were prepared. Incisal guidance was set at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 degree. Condylar guidance was set at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 degree. Respective contribution of the incisal and condylar guidance were analyzed by calculating multiple regression coefficient with resultant coordinate data. Results: Relative influence of condylar and incisal guidance on vertical displacement of non-working side maxillary 1st molar were calculated as multiple regression coefficients of 0.431 and 0.881, respectively. Relative contribution of both guidance to lateral condylar inclination of non-working side maxillary 1st molar were calculated as multiple regression coefficients of 0.502 and 0.833, respectively. When non-working side excursion was limited to 1mm (along the X axis), difference between Z axis coordinate of 30 degree and that of less than 30 degree within the same incisal guidance setting varied from 172 to 1405 micrometer. Inter-examiner reliability indicated the experimental results to be within statistically highly reliable range. Conclusion: There was difference in vertical position of maxillary right first molar during non-working side movement when condylar guidance setting varied. However, the incisal guidance had more effect over condylar guidance on vertical position and the lateral condylar inclination of the non-working side mandibular movement in articulator.CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Materials and Methods 3 3. Results 6 4. Discussion 7 5. Conclusion 10 References 11 TABLES Table 1 15 Table 2 16 Table 3 17 Table 4 18 Table 5 19 Table 6 20 FIGURES Figure 1 21 Figure 2 22 Figure 3 23 Figure 4 24 Figure 5 25 Figure 6 26 Korean Abstract 27Maste
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore